User talk:AMomen88

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hi AMomen88! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternately, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (talk) (contribs) Remember to {{ping}} me after replying off my talk page 19:13, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Biden 2020[edit]

Hello! It appears that you added John Kasich to the Biden 2020 endorsements without a source. I can not seem to find a source supporting this. Please add a source, or else this information will have to be deleted. We don’t want any Crystal Ball edits on the article. Happy editing! Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 23:23, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mariska Hargitay, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —MelbourneStartalk 07:19, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.elle.com/culture/career-politics/a40067/mariska-hargitay-hillary-clinton-endorsement/ AMomen88 (talk) 23:52, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Indian Reunification Association[edit]

Hello AMomen88,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Indian Reunification Association for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 22:21, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prime Minister of Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Convention. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page ettiquette[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Cabinet of Bangladesh, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
If you wish to withdraw your requested move, you may do so by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:48, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on content, not on editors[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Worldbruce. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Barind that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:52, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 22:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying me AMomen88 (talk) 01:59, 30 December 2020 (UTC) AMomen88 (talk) 01:59, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello AMomen88! Your additions to Court dress have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 20:45, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Majority parameter in Infobox officeholder[edit]

In this edit, you recently added majorities to the infobox of a Bangladeshi politician. In British politics, majority is a closely tracked number (e.g. [1][2][3][4]). Not so in Bangladesh. Although it can be calculated, reliable sources almost never do.

infoboxes are supposed to be concise summaries, in this case of what's most important about a politician. Because they are general purpose, they have many more fields available than should actually be used in any given biography. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. It should not exhaustively list every detail of a topic, even if true. This is an encyclopedia, it should summarize what reliable sources say regarding its subject.

I don't know why majority never caught on as a measure in Bangladesh, perhaps it isn't as meaningful because of the country's rapidly growing population, multiple election boycotts, and irregular elections interspersed with military or caretaker rule. Whatever the reason, Wikipedia should follow reliable sources and avoid bloat by omitting "majority" from the infoboxes of Bangladeshi politicians. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:59, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of prime ministers of Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Government of Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cabinet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cabinet or ministries[edit]

Please look at Category:National cabinets, it seems cabinet is the common name for Commonwealth governments. I am not sure if the move is appropriate. Instead of moving them individually and getting into a potential edit war; let's open a discussion on a talk page and see which name has consensus?Vinegarymass911 (talk) 03:48, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vinegarymass911 I respectfully disagree. Please have a look at similar pages for the UK, India, Pakistan, Canada and Australia. All are members of the Commonwealth and have parliamentary systems of government. All refer to their "Cabinets" as ministries. In fact, I haven't come across a Commonwealth member that refers to their ministries as cabinets with the exception of Bangladesh. I did not change Cabinet of Bangladesh to "Ministries of Bangladesh", I changed the article names on List of cabinets of Bangladesh. I do not think that discussion on a talk page is warranted, but if it is required to prevent an edit war, I suppose it could happen.–AMomen88 (talk) 18:58, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, I withdraw my objections.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 02:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mujibnagar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amirul Islam.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Bangladesh-Finland relations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WaddlesJP13 (talk | contributions) 02:39, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of international prime ministerial trips made by Sheikh Hasina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international prime ministerial trips made by Sheikh Hasina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TheLongTone (talk) 14:43, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You brought up a great point![edit]

Assalamu alaykum, Abdul.

I'd like to apologize for any offence that my previous edits on the Sheikh Mujibur Rahman page may have caused you. (This wasn't my intention)

You brought up an excellent point about how the Quaid-e-Azam's page doesn't list his name in Bangla. I'll try and that in.

It looks like you work on a lot of Bangladesh-related articles. I'm interested in Bangladesh too, so see you around! :)

Historicamatic (talk) 07:32, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Walaikum-Salam Historicamatic. I apologise if I came across a bit blunt in the edit summary. It's great to hear you're interested in Bangladesh, I look forward to seeing you around too!—AMomen88 (talk) 18:03, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sinn Féin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important alert[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Abhishek0831996 (talk) 08:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sheikh Hasina sidebar[edit]

Template:Sheikh Hasina sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My recently reverted edit to the Sheikh Mujibur Rahman page[edit]

Hey Abdul,

Sorry for using the incorrect date for the start of Operation Searchlight… I thought it began on the 26th of March, 1971. It seems this was incorrect?

I also want to apologize for describing it as an interruption. I should’ve been more specific and linked to the Operation Searchlight page. It was not my intention to be biased.

Can you list to me all the issues that were present so I can fix them? I still think the beginning of the page is hard to read, so let’s work together to fix things! 🤝

I know in my heart, intuitively, that we can fix the page and turn it into an exemplary article.

Hussein Historicamatic (talk) 13:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Awami[edit]

Hi

we have still All Pakistan Awami Muslim League for the 1949/71 period.--Panam2014 (talk) 23:55, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Information icon Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Economy of Bangladesh, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Solomon The Magnifico (talk) 08:27, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion[edit]

A discussion for dispute resolving is heppening here. You have to comment. Mehedi Abedin 07:21, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@AMomen88: There is a discussion in progress and your comment is needed to resolve the dispute. Mehedi Abedin 06:34, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Give your opinion[edit]

A dispute resolution discussion is happening. Please give your opinion for the selected photos here. If you give your opinion, then it will be easier to select better photo for Economy of Bangladesh. Mehedi Abedin 14:51, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nagar Bhaban for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nagar Bhaban, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagar Bhaban until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.  // Timothy :: talk  03:31, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for naked violation of your topic ban, as you did at User talk:TimothyBlue.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 03:36, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is closed -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. The user is warned that they must address their topic ban violation and should make their unblock request here. --Yamla (talk) 18:18, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AMomen88 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I believe I should be unblocked because my conduct on Wikipedia has been generally positive, I have helped contribute to a certain degree to many key articles on Wikipedia. I am particularly active on Bangladesh Wikipedia. I am well-known for editing Bangladesh-related articles. I have improved their quality by inserting balanced and neutral content which is well-sourced. I have also repaired citations which have not been formatted correctly. I am genuinely passionate about the Wikipedia project, I joined this project as I am a staunch supporter and advocate of the principles of Wikipedia enshrined in the five pillars. This is an open source project which aims to better educate humanity, an admirable cause which is essential in light of the rise of disinformation dissemination via the use of the internet. I was originally dismayed that many Bangladesh-related articles were somewhat unkempt, as a result I joined this project and have attempted to use my skills of formatting and proficiency in the English language to try and improve the plight of these articles. It brought me immense joy and satisfaction to be a part of this project. I feel very proud to have helped contribute in a small way to the proliferation of knowledge vis-a-vis Bangladesh and other topics on this great repository of information.

I am incredibly dismayed and distraught that I was banned permanently. The rationale behind this was solely as a result of my conduct on a single article. All of the previous sanctions I was imposed with derive from thus single article also. I have already been barred from editing this article, if this ban is lifted I will without question not edit that article. I have been juggling with stressful exams and as a result have not been able to follow the Wikipedia Policies as stringently as I should have. I believe that banning me permanently because of my conduct on a single article is unfair as this is notwithstanding the productive contributions I have made to other articles for a number of years. The additions I make are not gnomish, they are content-heavy and are well-cited. The particular reason why I was banned was because I advised another user that there was an unfinished sentence on the article in question. I am committed to the Wikipedia Project, it is my desire to ensure that Wikipedia articles are to the highest possible standard and quality. Surely, an unfinished sentence does not meet the high standards required for a Wikipedia article. And surely, pointing this fact out does not warrant a permanent block. I have just checked the article and the sentence remains unfinished, no one has finished the sentence in the last few months. I believe this is emblematic of the neglect that many Bangladeshi related articles are subject to.

Regardless of the fact that I believed what I was doing was right, I should have followed the rules and should not have violated the sanctions which were imposed against me. I am very passionate about the Wikipedia project, and in particular Bangladesh, this is a subject which is close to my heart and as a result I can on occasion allow my emotions to get the better of me, which can begin to provide an explanation for my regretful conduct which resulted in my Tban. Having said all of this, I have had time to reflect and now recognise that my conduct was not inline with the high standards which are expected of an editor on Wikipedia. I would savour the opportunity for restitution, if I am reinstated I will always conduct myself in the most utmost manner which is befitting of an editor of this esteemed project and I pledge to refrain from engaging in futile squabbles regarding content which do nothing but poison the atmosphere. I commit to resolving any disputes in good faith without violating any Wikipedia Policies and I will always interpret other editors as acting in good faith.

I have now concluded my exams so I will be able to contribute positively and productively to the Wikipedia Project, whilst religiously following the Wikipedia Policies and other guidelines. If the block is lifted I will commit to follow the Wikipedia Policies to the letter, I will not edit war and will not violate any sanctions which have been imposed on me. Please grant me the opportunity to mend my ways, it is my most fervent wish to prove that I am a productive editor to this project. Thank you. AMomen88 (talk) 02:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There are only only a few sentences in this long unblock request that are about why you were blocked. "I will always interpret other editors as acting in good faith" is the same thing as "I will assume good faith", except that it's twice as long. Please post a new unblock request that's 1/2 to 1/3 the length of this one, and stick to talking only about the reason why you were blocked. This is a kind of generic "I will follow every policy" promise that could apply to almost anyone. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:59, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were not "banned permanently", you were blocked to enforce a topic ban, and not given an end date. This only means that the block will last until you convince an administrator to remove it. We all have stressful times in our lives; what will you do in the future if you experience another stressful time that may affect how you participate here? 331dot (talk) 09:23, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Indian Reunification Association for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indian Reunification Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Reunification Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

KSAWikipedian (talk) 05:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]