User talk:Gapbridger

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Gapbridger! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 18:31, Wednesday, April 5, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your removal of defunct associated acts parameter from infoboxes[edit]

Please slow down and carefully assess the list before simply erasing the line. Many of them contain bands that the person is or was a member. In these cases, the band should be put in current_member_of or past_member_of parameters. For example, Juan Aguirre (musician) and Amaral (band). Aithus (talk) 04:41, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, my intention was indeed to revisit those and replace with the parameters you mentioned, and also spinoff_of= and spinoffs= where appropriate, as described on the tracking category page. Gapbridger (talk) 09:09, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dolltr!ck (September 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Modussiccandi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Despite the impressive number of sources covering dolltr!ck in some way, I am not convinced there are any that 1) are completely independent of her and 2) cover her in sufficient depth. If two piece of coverage fulfilling theses criteria could be found, the article would be publishable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dolltr!ck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Modussiccandi (talk) 13:13, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Gapbridger! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Modussiccandi (talk) 13:13, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]