Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoToMyPC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep, no consensus, especially due to article clean-up. SushiGeek 03:11, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GoToMyPC

spam Bachrach44 00:53, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete. Pure advertising. Their television commercials are bad enough without this. Fluit 01:03, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, advertising. Royboy crashfan 01:04, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above. -- Scientizzle 01:06, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Fluit. -- Con Dem^Talk 01:08, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete - Although the software is used by many, the article definitely isn't NPOV, and as other users have said, it reads like advertising copy, and may also be a copyvio. =P

Alyssa3467 01:12, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Gotomypc into it and Clean Up the end result.

Alyssa3467 22:17, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — notable software, but violates WP:SPAM. Articles should not be written from blatant advertisements. Feezo (Talk) 02:29, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 02:42, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SOFTWARE and WP:SPAM --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 03:09, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Spam. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 03:14, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep If someone can find the source, as I'm leaving right now, I know I've seen this advertised on TV and the internet. There is notability. T K E 06:22, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete SPAM. Can be given a mention at Citrix and does not require a redirect or merge. Eusebeus 09:28, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, spam, no ciatation of sources. --Ter e nc e Ong 10:27, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete spam etc. James Kendall [talk] 11:09, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete until someone feels like writing a proper article. Lhlhlh 11:21, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spamadvertisement. Bucketsofg 12:07, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep per T K E Computerjoe 's talk 15:18, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also, millions of ghits. Computerjoe 's talk 15:20, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per T K E. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 15:29, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge content to Citrix Systems.--Isotope23 16:36, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No one disagrees with the notion that the software is notable. However, this is not the article for it. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as advertisement Imarek 20:22, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per feezo, Kinu, and Imarek. --He:ah? 20:54, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep cleaned up a bit, this is notable and important software. Needs mroe cleanup, though. Just zis Guy you know? 22:39, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as advertisement. -- P199 22:55, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but clean up, add a screen shot, etc. If you deleted this then why not delete all of the programs on the Anti-virus software page? --laurap414 23:24, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the way in which the article is written is spamtastic. Vulcanstar6 23:27, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but needs heavy clean up. The software exists and is quite popular; it's a popular remote desktop program. Zetawoof^(ζ) 00:45, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, many, many media mentions. Monicasdude 02:17, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but cleanup. — TKD::Talk 04:05, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as notable (with various media mentions) - in present form, not bad enough to be deleted simply due to content being a mess. --Fuzzie (talk) 01:27, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable enough. If it is WP:VSCA {{sofixit}}. Kotepho 13:15, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: As Rod Serling would say, submitted for your consideration is the fact that there is a separate entry for Gotomypc, which is written in a much less commercial manner and with a bit more of a NPOV. If GoToMyPC ends up being deleted, purhaps Gotomypc can be flagged with a clean-up tag.
Merge' with Gotomypc and propose renaming to correct capitalization on the talk page. A google news search turns up hits talking about the software on ZDNet and PCWorld magazines. Not liking the service is not enough to propose deletion of an article, although I don't object to deletion in general. Merge may well mean keeping most of Gotomypc and less of the other, but a feature list is relevant as you can tell by many other software pages. -- cmh 01:33, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep due to latest clean-up work. MikeBriggs 16:53, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.