Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lelo Sejean
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete Enigmamsg 22:40, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lelo Sejean[edit]
- Lelo Sejean (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Hard to believe that an article with 56 references and in over 20 cats can be deletable, but I can't see anything at all notable about this person. Minor actor, minor footballer, nothing specific that may be notable other than a best actor award at a minor film festival, which isn't enough in my opinion. The-Pope (talk) 07:34, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lelo had a week off school and was bored. 10 out of 10 for persistence. Szzuk (talk) 08:16, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That article is a case study in bombarding us with references- 8 for a single fact in one place. 3 or 4 references for things that don't need one- and then look at the references. Wikis, Wikipedia pages, unreliable sources, etc. 4 roles as an extra, no attempt at passing WP:ATHLETE. Frankly, the whole article looks like a giant mask. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 09:13, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Bradjamesbrown (talk) 09:15, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: obvious bombing that occasionally linked to unreliable references. It cited various wikis, Yahoo! Answers, various blogs and other comparable resources. Alexius08 (talk) 09:25, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. The-Pope (talk) 13:02, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No reliable sources indicating anything remotely close to notability. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:06, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per above. Evalpor (talk) 21:50, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, lots of sources, but none of them reliable. Lankiveil (speak to me) 01:58, 10 January 2010 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete per nominator, no basis to a claim of notability, no reliable sources. IMDb only credits him (as "Boy") for the short film, Bright Lights. I don't see a reasonable claim to notability as an actor or an athlete and the sourcing is terrible. Sarah 12:53, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above. Freikorp (talk) 03:22, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.