Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Dunst

William Dunst

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable as not meeting WP:SINGER. I couldn't find a secondary source. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 19:51, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Hungary. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 19:51, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable, one of many non-notable articles about members of this family created by the author. CoconutOctopus talk 20:51, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Also note that the article's creator has attempted to blank this AfD. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 10:53, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Does not satisfy the requirements of WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV or WP:MUSICBIO. I had earlier draftified the page with advice for the creator on his or her talkpage. But he or she added it back to the mainspace pretty much ignoring all my advice. Pity. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 12:46, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The claim that William Dunst (Dunszt Vilmos) is "non-notable as not meeting WP:SINGER" could be challenged given his documented activities and recognition as a multifaceted artist. He is a singer-songwriter, topliner, actor, model, and creative director, primarily active in Budapest. His career achievements include acting in notable theater productions such as The Jungle Book and The Attic. He also gained popularity through his YouTube music channel, where his early covers achieved significant views

In music, his works like the albums Vibrations (2023) and Sex Marathon (2024) showcase his development as a recording artist. Furthermore, his presence on platforms like SoundBetter, with positive reviews highlighting his unique voice and artistry, adds credibility to his professional profile.

While secondary sources and broader media coverage may be limited, the outlined accomplishments suggest a basis for notability, particularly if additional independent verification or media coverage is sought. Jomajor8 (talk) 11:58, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, ChatGPT. E Eng 06:34, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

* Do not Delete: All the references are included and irrelevant reason for deletion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jomajor8 (talk • contribs) 12:01, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable, doesn't meet notability guidelines. Canterbury Tail talk 17:20, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm sure his mother loves him, and I wish him well in his future career, but AFAICT all the sources are WP:ROUTINE and/or self-published and/or non-independent. E Eng 16:18, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, middle-school children should not be writing and performing songs about sex. E Eng 06:34, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Sources are primarily self-promotional, routine performance announcements, or database entries (MusicBrainz) rather than significant independent coverage. Theater understudy roles, YouTube covers, and self-released albums do not establish notability without substantial coverage in reliable secondary sources. Madeleine961 (talk) 22:34, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]