Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Updation: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
WCFrancis (talk | contribs)
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was delete [[User:Duncharris|Dunc]]|[[User talk:duncharris|&#9786;]] 18:00, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
===[[Updation]]===
===[[Updation]]===
[[WP:WINAD]]. Dicdef neologism without possibility of expansion. '''Delete'''. [[User:Dmcdevit|Dmcdevit]] 4 July 2005 05:13 (UTC)
[[WP:WINAD]]. Dicdef neologism without possibility of expansion. '''Delete'''. [[User:Dmcdevit|Dmcdevit]] 4 July 2005 05:13 (UTC)
Line 5: Line 11:
*'''Strong Delete'''-- ''Bad'' neologism. --[[User:WCFrancis|WCFrancis]] 4 July 2005 05:55 (UTC)
*'''Strong Delete'''-- ''Bad'' neologism. --[[User:WCFrancis|WCFrancis]] 4 July 2005 05:55 (UTC)
:Additional '''Comment''' -- even if it were a good word, it would only be a candidate for a dictionary, not an encyclopedia. -- [[User:WCFrancis|WCFrancis]] 4 July 2005 05:57 (UTC)
:Additional '''Comment''' -- even if it were a good word, it would only be a candidate for a dictionary, not an encyclopedia. -- [[User:WCFrancis|WCFrancis]] 4 July 2005 05:57 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Neologist dicdef. Use the noun form of ''update''. --[[User:Alex12 3|Alex12 3]] 4 July 2005 07:44 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - dicdef [[User:JoJan|JoJan]] 4 July 2005 07:54 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' dicdef. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] July 4, 2005 10:27 (UTC)
*'''Delete, possibly redir''' to [[Update]]. [[User:Radiant!|R]][[User_talk:Radiant!|adiant]][[meta:mergist|_<span style="color:orange;">&gt;|&lt;</span>]] July 4, 2005 11:42 (UTC)
*'''Delete''': neologism, WP is not a slang guide --[[User:IByte|IByte]] 4 July 2005 12:53 (UTC)
*'''Deletion''', WP not a repository for made-up words. -[[User:Splash|Splash]] July 4, 2005 13:08 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' I agree with all the above. [[User:Oliverkeenan|Oliver Keenan]] July 4, 2005 19:06 (UTC)


:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>

Latest revision as of 17:13, 29 March 2022