Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cascade correlation algorithm: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Substing templates: {{unsigned2}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info. |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*'''Merge''', not notable enough to stand alone.-[[User:Kmaguir1|Kmaguir1]] 03:03, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Merge''', not notable enough to stand alone.-[[User:Kmaguir1|Kmaguir1]] 03:03, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
**'''Merged, awaiting redirect''' I saw no reason for the content to not be on [[artificial neural networks]], so it's been merged. Haven't done the redirect yet, as I'd consider that bad AfD form (since it's effectively deleting) [[User:LinaMishima|LinaMishima]] 03:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
**'''Merged, awaiting redirect''' I saw no reason for the content to not be on [[artificial neural networks]], so it's been merged. Haven't done the redirect yet, as I'd consider that bad AfD form (since it's effectively deleting) [[User:LinaMishima|LinaMishima]] 03:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
***Please copy over my expanded citation details for original article if content merged. |
***Please copy over my expanded citation details for original article if content merged. [[User:Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters|<span style="color:darkgreen;">LotLE</span>]]×[[User talk:Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters|<span style="color:darkred; font-size:x-small;">talk</span>]] 03:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
****Done, thank you for that! Unfortunately the referencing sytle the article uses makes seeing the addition hard, but it's there, in the same format as the rest (or as near as possible). [[User:LinaMishima|LinaMishima]] 03:28, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
****Done, thank you for that! Unfortunately the referencing sytle the article uses makes seeing the addition hard, but it's there, in the same format as the rest (or as near as possible). [[User:LinaMishima|LinaMishima]] 03:28, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''': This concept seems to show up on [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=%22Cascade-correlation+algorithm%22&btnG=Search Google scholar with 472 cites]. Taking a look at some of these might provide information to flesh out this article. |
*'''Comment''': This concept seems to show up on [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=%22Cascade-correlation+algorithm%22&btnG=Search Google scholar with 472 cites]. Taking a look at some of these might provide information to flesh out this article. [[User:Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters|<span style="color:darkgreen;">LotLE</span>]]×[[User talk:Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters|<span style="color:darkred; font-size:x-small;">talk</span>]] 02:24, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. This article has enough information to exist on its own. Furthermore, the topic is interesting. Non-notability should be less of an issue as this article may not be particularly popular, given the specialized topic, however, it does provideuseful information that some users would enjoy. Wikipedia is not a paper. As such there is essentially limitless space to provide useful information. Going in depth on topics will only add to the value of Wikipedia to users. [[User:Nlsanand|Nlsanand]] 05:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''. This article has enough information to exist on its own. Furthermore, the topic is interesting. Non-notability should be less of an issue as this article may not be particularly popular, given the specialized topic, however, it does provideuseful information that some users would enjoy. Wikipedia is not a paper. As such there is essentially limitless space to provide useful information. Going in depth on topics will only add to the value of Wikipedia to users. [[User:Nlsanand|Nlsanand]] 05:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' ''"no citable info, just a .pdf file"'' So since when have PDFs not been citable? Seems to warrant an article IMO [[User:MichaelBillington|Michael Billington]] ([[User talk:MichaelBillington|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MichaelBillington|contribs]]) 11:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' ''"no citable info, just a .pdf file"'' So since when have PDFs not been citable? Seems to warrant an article IMO [[User:MichaelBillington|Michael Billington]] ([[User talk:MichaelBillington|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MichaelBillington|contribs]]) 11:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
*'''Keep''' - Referenced, encyclopaedic. Notability is a terrible criterion in Math, Science and the like [[User:WilyD|WilyD]] 13:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' - Referenced, encyclopaedic. Notability is a terrible criterion in Math, Science and the like [[User:WilyD|WilyD]] 13:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' - Comes up during any introductory course on neural networks and introduces significant changes to these. Also, the topic recently has been getting attention in the field of modelling cognitive development.[[User:blackvoid|blackvoid]] 15:31, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' - Comes up during any introductory course on neural networks and introduces significant changes to these. Also, the topic recently has been getting attention in the field of modelling cognitive development.[[User:blackvoid|blackvoid]] 15:31, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' - I think this stands up as an independent article. It could use some expansion, such as graphics illustrating the algorithm and more specific explanation of how it works, but that can happen with time. The expanded version I'd want would be too long for inclusion in whole in Arificial neural networks (but a "see also" between them would certainly be relevant). |
*'''Keep''' - I think this stands up as an independent article. It could use some expansion, such as graphics illustrating the algorithm and more specific explanation of how it works, but that can happen with time. The expanded version I'd want would be too long for inclusion in whole in Arificial neural networks (but a "see also" between them would certainly be relevant). [[User:Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters|<span style="color:darkgreen;">LotLE</span>]]×[[User talk:Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters|<span style="color:darkred; font-size:x-small;">talk</span>]] 17:44, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' or at the very least '''Merge''' . I don't know how you get as few as 472 google hits. I found the entry useful. |
*'''Keep''' or at the very least '''Merge''' . I don't know how you get as few as 472 google hits. I found the entry useful. |
||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |