Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Beeblebrox: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Oppose: indenting
Pakaran (talk | contribs)
closed, no consensus to promote
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata rfa" style="background-color: #fff5f5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship#Current nominations for bureaucratship|request for bureaucratship]] '''that did not succeed'''. <strong style="color:red">Please do not modify it</strong>.[[Category:Unsuccessful requests for bureaucratship]]

{{pp-semi-sock|expiry=31 July 2012|small=yes}}
{{pp-semi-sock|expiry=31 July 2012|small=yes}}
===[[Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]]===
===[[Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]]===
<span class="plainlinks">'''[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Beeblebrox|action=edit&section=5}} <font color="#002BB8">Voice your opinion on this candidate</font>]'''</span> ([[Wikipedia talk:Requests for bureaucratship/Beeblebrox|talk page]])
<span class="plainlinks">'''[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Beeblebrox|action=edit&section=5}} <font color="#002BB8">Voice your opinion on this candidate</font>]'''</span> ([[Wikipedia talk:Requests for bureaucratship/Beeblebrox|talk page]])
'''Final (93/42/9]); ended 00:47, 30 July 2012 (UTC) - No Consensus [[User:Pakaran|Pak]][[User talk:Pakaran|aran]] 00:47, 30 July 2012 (UTC)''' <!-- Template:finaltally -->, closed at 00:45 July 30 2012 by [[User:Pakaran|pakaran]].
'''{{rfatally|Beeblebrox}}<!-- WHEN CLOSING THIS RFA, REPLACE THIS PART WITH {{subst:finaltally|[SUPPORTVOTES]|[OPPOSEVOTES]|[NEUTRALVOTES]|[OPTIONALMESSAGE] OR [result=successful] OR [reason=SNOW] OR [reason=NOTNOW] OR (blank)}} SEE TEMPLATE FOR MORE DETAILS -->; Scheduled to end 23:27, 29 July 2012 (UTC)'''


====Nomination====
====Nomination====
Line 337: Line 340:
#'''Neutral'''. I think Beeblebrox has rather a good point when he says that very little of what 'crats do day-to-day is contentious or judgment-based; most of the jobs 'crats do these days are governed by policy (username changes) or community ragevoting (99% of RfXs), and in neither of those cases is there a terrible amount of judgment (as opposed to application-of-established-standards) done by the 'crat, at least as far as those of us who aren't 'crats can tell. In that sense, I think Beeblebrox would be a fine 'crat, and it sort of bothers me that he should be opposed based on the 1% of possible 'crat actions which might sort of require judgment which he may or may not have, given that those cases are almost by definition not judged by a single 'crat , but by a 'crat chat. So, strictly speaking, you don't need to be Joe Perfect-Judgment to do most 'crat tasks. However, the will of the community is that the people it chooses to do these not-necessarily-always-judgey tasks should be uncontroversial, meticulous, and sort of bland. That's why we call them bureaucrats, after all, and not "Super Deathmatch Referees(tm) (bullwhip sold separately)!". I think Beeblebrox will happily agree with me when I say that "bland" is not really a word that describes him particularly well, which means that as much as I think he could do the job about as well as anyone else, I don't think he's suited to what the community feels people doing the job should be. [[User:Fluffernutter|A fluffernutter is a sandwich!]] ([[User talk:Fluffernutter|talk]]) 18:30, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
#'''Neutral'''. I think Beeblebrox has rather a good point when he says that very little of what 'crats do day-to-day is contentious or judgment-based; most of the jobs 'crats do these days are governed by policy (username changes) or community ragevoting (99% of RfXs), and in neither of those cases is there a terrible amount of judgment (as opposed to application-of-established-standards) done by the 'crat, at least as far as those of us who aren't 'crats can tell. In that sense, I think Beeblebrox would be a fine 'crat, and it sort of bothers me that he should be opposed based on the 1% of possible 'crat actions which might sort of require judgment which he may or may not have, given that those cases are almost by definition not judged by a single 'crat , but by a 'crat chat. So, strictly speaking, you don't need to be Joe Perfect-Judgment to do most 'crat tasks. However, the will of the community is that the people it chooses to do these not-necessarily-always-judgey tasks should be uncontroversial, meticulous, and sort of bland. That's why we call them bureaucrats, after all, and not "Super Deathmatch Referees(tm) (bullwhip sold separately)!". I think Beeblebrox will happily agree with me when I say that "bland" is not really a word that describes him particularly well, which means that as much as I think he could do the job about as well as anyone else, I don't think he's suited to what the community feels people doing the job should be. [[User:Fluffernutter|A fluffernutter is a sandwich!]] ([[User talk:Fluffernutter|talk]]) 18:30, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
#:you realize of courst that I will now have to put together [[Request for Super Deathmatch Referee/Beeblebrox]]. [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 18:38, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
#:you realize of courst that I will now have to put together [[Request for Super Deathmatch Referee/Beeblebrox]]. [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 18:38, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
{{subst:rfbb}

Revision as of 00:47, 30 July 2012