User talk:Flooded with them hundreds: Difference between revisions

Good to see you back

Just wanted to say I'm glad you didn't stay away. Hope to see you around. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 17:30, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Glad to see that you're back! -INeedSupport- ^:3 18:37, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Illegitimi non carborundum 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:24, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi there

Daniel johnson (talk) 12:34, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Yay you are back!!

You might want to be aware of Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion#User:Flooded with them hundreds (multiple).

Also, have this barnstar:

		The Barnstar of Liberty
		The Comeback is real. ―Matthew J. Long -Talk-☖ 20:24, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

The vandals might want to see a blue link instead of a red one! ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 03:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

FYI on that, if you don't want your username red-linked, but don't want an active userpage either, you can just redirect your userpage to to your talk page, many editors do that.

It's always good to take a break every once in awhile, but if it's only for a week, can I suggest you use a wiki-break notice instead of the retirement notice?

Also, nice to see you have another colorful signature, don't let the wiki-signature police hound you about it, (at least, not to the point of quitting).

Lastly, you have quite the fan-club... be worthy of them. Welcome back - wolf 03:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

• Glad to see the RETIRED sign gone. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:24, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Welcome back

Its good to have you back. Quick question: in User:DannyS712/SPP 02, I was planning to say you had retired and that I had taken over your scripts. Clearly, you're not retired anymore, but do you want yours scripts back? --DannyS712 (talk) 06:34, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

DannyS712, nope. -- Flooded with them hundreds 06:45, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Paul is dead article

You reverted my change to the Paul is dead article and asked for a citation, but a citation isn't applicable here. Someone had changed the first paragraph to read, "Paul is not dead is an urban legend..." when it should clearly match the title of the page, like so: "Paul is dead is an urban legend..." 66.190.54.41 (talk) 08:16, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

It was a mistaek. -- Flooded with them hundreds 08:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Pierce Fulton's discography section

Hello there! Recently, I wanted to update the discography section of Pierce Fulton as he just released a new song few days ago, however I found out that you removed the singles' discography few months ago so you can rework on it (according to this page). I just want to know about how and where the rework goes to see if I can update the article. If the rework haven't completed yet or something happened to it, should I just update the song first for now? Thanks for reading and welcome back there! PeaceSearcher (talk) 11:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

I didn't have time to do that, I'll restore it to the article. -- Flooded with them hundreds 11:25, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the favor! Since you said you didn't have time on it, I'll consider if I'll take over on the rework. PeaceSearcher (talk) 11:58, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Happy to see you back. Ruyaba (talk) 14:30, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

page move

Hi there. Thank you for your help with the MasterChef Khmer article move. I should have been able to do that, but got stuck with the move over redirect. I thought there was something wrong with my permissions, possibly moves from Wikipedia only possible for admins. I am extendedmover. Is moving articles into your own space to make way for a move an accepted procedure? Thanks! _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

It helps and according to the redirect suppression criteria, it complies with #6 and #9. -- Flooded w/them 100s 08:08, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Jake Brockman, it's really not a great idea (since now FWTH has a user subpage with attribution and edits that don't belong to them). I highly suggest using User:Andy M. Wang/pageswap, which will take care of all of the moving issues if you cannot move over redirect (which, by the way, is only doable by a PGM if the redirect is pointing at the current page). Primefac (talk) 15:02, 29 January 2019 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

Yeah, and I only utilize the subspace for clear-cut cases in which the page requiring deletion has no substantial history. Other times, the pageswap tool is used. -- Flooded w/them 100s 16:57, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks Primefac. I'll try the pageswap tool. I wasn't aware of it. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 17:58, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

signature

FWIW, I really like this new signature. Clear, easy to read, and stylish. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! It's inspired by an old signature ( TheMagnificentist ) 😉. -- Flooded w/them 100s 16:58, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Your eyes must be better than mine, User:78.26... Drmies (talk) 17:09, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Ha! I doubt it. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. But I like it. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:51, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• I hope changing it was your own choice and you weren't pressured into doing so by some... person. (But it does look good). - wolf 18:44, 29 January 2019 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

I prefer this more, since it does not occupy more than half of the line. --DBigXrayᗙ 20:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Category:Mumble rap has been nominated for discussion

Category:Mumble rap, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:13, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lune Rouge (Album) has been accepted

Lune Rouge (Album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:23, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

I've attributed the AFC acceptance to your work and have issued a RM/TR to move it from (Album) to (album) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:31, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

 Done. Just as a note, when you remove a bunch of copyvio text, you should request a revdel afterward. Primefac (talk) 19:44, 30 January 2019 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

reply

Hi

Well, you are partially correct. You are correct about the use of "an" before words of which first word is pronounced as a vowel.

But based on one's region/accent a lot of words are pronounced differently. Most commonly known different pronunciations are American "dance" (similar to [tin] cans) vs British "dance" (daans).

In this particular case, "year" is pronounced "ear". Similar to hour (our). So it gets prefixed with an "an".

Regards, —usernamekiran(talk) 20:24, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Use of Page Mover

Hi. I'm curious about why you choose to make this move without leaving a redirect. Best wishes, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:50, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Per the draft namespace policy, the page wasn't suitable to be left in the draftspace. As there was room for improvement, userfying it felt like a reasonable thing to do. -- Flooded w/them 100s 18:59, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Flooded with them hundreds, I'm not questioning the move. I think the policy is clear there. I'm curious why you did it with the page move permission of not leaving a redirect which doesn't seem to meet any of the permissible reasons to suppress the redirect. Best wishes, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

It meets #6, #9. -- Flooded w/them 100s 19:09, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

It does not meet 6 because it was not from mainspace it was from draft space to user space. 9 seems somewhat reasonable. Which speedy delete criteria did you have in mind? Best wishes, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:11, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

I missed the part about mainspace. G2, G6, G10 may be applicable as the page appeared to be a test page, an attack page and a page requiring housekeeping. -- Flooded w/them 100s 19:18, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

The resulting redirect doesn't qualify for speedy deletion though, so this was still incorrect per WP:PMRC#9. Bradv🍁 19:20, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

I will grant you that G2 is reasonable enough, but would suggest that from this conversation it appears to be after the fact thinking rather than a criteria in your mind when you did the move. As for the other two criteria you've listed, the G10 version was not present in the history of the article when you moved it and I think G6 is a tough claim because of the criteria that specifically exists around redirects. In looking through your talk page history it seems like this is not the first time concerns have been raised. I would hope that you would renew your promise to Nick in how you use this right. Best wishes, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:27, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

It was my pledge to talk page stalkers, not to Nick specifically and it was not a formal restriction that I have to adhere to like 1. His word is not policy. If it is obviously problematic, I will not be doing it. This move, as discussed above, is justified by WP:PGM. If it is not, then I apologize and will refrain from performing any more. Thank you. -- Flooded w/them 100s 19:57, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

I hate to do this, because I was genuinely hoping that you would be able to work past the issues you were dealing with the first time your rights were revoked, but I'm going to have to pull your perm. The incident in December was a minor thing and I defended you, but then I see issues like this, this, and others, and it's becoming more and more obvious that you're not really paying attention to what you're doing. If you decide to re-apply for PGM in the future (and I would strongly suggest waiting at least six months before even considering that) you will need to go through the normal PERM process; I will not outright oppose, but neither will I vouch for you. Primefac (talk) 20:17, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Primefac, remove them all. I needed a break anyway. -- Flooded w/them 100s 20:27, 5 February 2019 (UTC)