User talk:TG-article: Difference between revisions

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2025/January;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 17:20, 15 January 2025

Hello, this is the talk page. Please make sure to follow the guidelines at WP:Talk page guidelines. THISGUYtalk 23:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi TG-article! I noticed your contributions to Transair Flight 810 and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 18:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ethiopian Airlines fleet, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:16, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Flag carrier. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 in aviation

Your edit has been removed as there is no article. You can re-add the accident when there is one, or re-add it when you create one. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 16:54, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

I noticed you have customised your signature. Unfortunately the light yellow text is very hard to read against a white background. If you really want to use a non-standard colour, might I suggest you choose something with better contrast, per WP:SIGAPP. Thanks! Rosbif73 (talk) 07:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing Nice

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 15:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

...but I don't have a sandbox. TG-article (talk to me) (contributions) 20:28, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you do, you just need to click on the link and create it. Canterbury Tail talk 21:49, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello TG-article, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025.
Happy editing,
Abishe (talk) 23:10, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 23:10, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Planespotters

Hello, I see that you have modified CMA CGM Air Cargo by deleting many references. The only comment you made is : Planespotters is an unreliable source. Looking at your contributions history, I can see that you have done the same thing in many airline-related articles - again without bothering to provide a factual reason. I am asking you either to explain why you came to this conclusion or to point me to your source. Of course, no single human source is 100 % reliable or perfect but, as far as this article is concerned, I find nothing wrong with the info they provide. So, not only does your rash, un-justified action violate WP rules (Wikipedia:Consensus etc..) but I must also say it looks very much like a personal matter for you. I hope I am wrong on the last point. Please explain. Domenjod (talk) 17:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Planespotters.net being unreliable is the long term consensus of Wikiproject Aviation and the Reliable Sources Noticeboard. You can see the last conversation here. Canterbury Tail talk 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Canterbury Tail talk 21:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 17:55, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeju Air Flight 2216

Stop adding the Ryanair photo. Plutonium27 (talk) 23:01, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK then... that's fine. TG-ARTICLE Well, if you want to talk to me, then why don't you click this button? There's also my contributions. 23:02, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Deadliest plane crash in South Korea

Hello, TG-article

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username 1ctinus and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Deadliest plane crash in South Korea, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 1 § Deadliest plane crash in South Korea.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|1ctinus}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-1ctinus📝🗨 00:11, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Aviationwikiflight (talk) 16:51, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Azerbaijan Airlines Flight 8243, may have been a change that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When making possibly controversial changes, it is good practice to first discuss your edit on the article's talk page before making it, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. As you notice the term "shootdown" does not appear anywhere in the article (and is frequently revered by many editors) because that term is controversial and consensus has yet to be form on the talk page regarding this term. TiggerJay (talk) 22:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Aviationwikiflight. I wanted to let you know that your signature design might cause problems for some readers. This is because as already raised above, the light yellow styled signature makes it hard to make out your username. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines and policy on customising signatures. Thank you. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 14:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Boeing 737 MAX shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Danners430 (talk) 17:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Images other than a logo in the infobox

I'm not sure where you got the idea that images of aircraft are not permitted in {{infobox airline}} as there is no consensus to forbid them or to force the box to have one. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Archive 22#Aircraft images in airline infoboxes. The use was accidentally removed by SWinxy with this edit. I've since restored the wording. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:12, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CambridgeBayWeather Because many editors do not permit aircraft images in infoboxes. For example, on Air Cairo, there used to be an aircraft image, specifically an image of the Airbus A320neo, which was removed by an editor saying that aircraft images should not be in infoboxes. THISGUYtalk 15:20, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's just one editor. The thing is that there is no consensus to remove them. I feel they are useful because they then match airport infoboxes. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

From here, I am not aware of any guidelines or consensus saying that we couldn't use the aircraft image in the infobox. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 12:39, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus to not have aircraft images in an airline infobox. Definitely is no rule that say they should be removed. Canterbury Tail talk 17:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 107: / Line 107: @@
 [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Aviationwikiflight|Aviationwikiflight]]. I wanted to let you know that your [[Wikipedia:Signatures|signature]] design might cause problems for some readers. This is because as already [[User talk:TG-article#Your signature|raised above]], the light yellow styled signature makes it hard to make out your username. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Aviationwikiflight|my talk page]], or take a look at our [[Wikipedia:SIGAPP|guidelines and policy on customising signatures]]. Thank you. [[Category:User talk pages with Uw-sigdesign notices|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!-- Template:uw-sigdesign1 --> [[User:Aviationwikiflight|Aviationwikiflight]] ([[User talk:Aviationwikiflight|talk]]) 14:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
+[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Boeing 737 MAX]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about [[WP:EPTALK|how this is done]]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].
+'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period.  Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert.  Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Danners430|Danners430]] ([[User talk:Danners430|talk]]) 17:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
 == Images other than a logo in the infobox ==