Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ham and cheese sandwich: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 21:37, 31 August 2005

Ham and cheese sandwich

Just read it

You know, I would not have thought that an article on a ham and cheese sandwich could have been encyclopedic, but this is actually pretty darn good. It's not a recipe, it's a full description, and it relates it to other types of food. Call me crazy, but for now I say keep. Nandesuka 11:47, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. We have articles on Monte Cristo sandwich and Croque monsieur (both properly linked from this one), so what's wrong with this article? --Russ Blau (talk) 11:54, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
It is indeed a good article. More there than a recipe. Get it to WP:FAC! Keep. Proto t c 12:08, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep This article is a good description of a ham and cheese sandwich. Something has to distinguish wikipedia from standard boring encyclopedias and to me this is it. It's also worth noting that while the big events of the day are recorded everywhere, the minutiae of everyday life aren't, and it's the minutiae of everyday life that can prove the most interesting to people in the future.
Keep - I look forward to a history section, anyone feel like doing some research on the background of the HCS? Usrnme h8er 12:45, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep DV8 2XL 12:46, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep per Nandesuka. --Apyule 13:27, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious Keep CalJW 13:35, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if such an enormous staple of a huge portion of the world's childhood isn't notable then we should also delete oxygen HoratioVitero 15:19, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Wow, look at all the stuff in Category:Sandwiches! This is why I love Wikipedia! the wub "?/!" 15:22, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. maybe somebody can research monte cristo, which i think also has powdered sugar and dipping syrup. SaltyPig 15:45, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep all sandwichcruft Roodog2k 16:22, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — bread and butter article. — RJH 17:00, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep please this doesnot make any sense either Yuckfoo 17:31, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is a perfectly reasonable article, and, with some history, pictures, and references, could eventually be expanded to a FAC. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 19:39, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Perfectly reasonable article. Not just a recipe. Culturally significant food in the United States. Dpbsmith (talk) 20:17, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per everyone, but esp. Nandesuka. --Blackcap | talk 21:29, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Just because it's a sandwich, that doesn't make it any less notable than the various other foods out there. It's a very common food -- a staple, even. Fight anti-sandwich bias (wichism?) on Wikipedia! :) Beginning 21:37, August 31, 2005 (UTC)

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 *'''Keep.''' Perfectly reasonable article. Not just a recipe. Culturally significant food in the United States. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] [[User_talk:dpbsmith|(talk)]] 20:17, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' per everyone, but esp. Nandesuka. --[[User:Blackcap|Blackcap]] | [[User_talk:Blackcap|talk]] 21:29, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
+*'''Keep'''.  Just because it's a sandwich, that doesn't make it any less notable than the various other foods out there.  It's a very common food -- a staple, even.  Fight anti-sandwich bias (wichism?) on Wikipedia! :)  [[User:Beginning|Beginning]] 21:37, August 31, 2005 (UTC)