Talk:Emma Watson: Difference between revisions

; Archives
	August 2004 – April 2006; May 2006 – July 2006; August 2006 – October 2006;

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Revision as of 08:59, 27 December 2006

Biography Unassessed

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Template:Maintained

Not signing up for next two movies?

http://www.slashfilm.com/article.php/20060927harry-potter-casting I wanted to add some of this information but the page is locked. Apparently she may not want to do the next two movies.The Horned Water 04:42, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you read the original interview, which has ben misquoted out of context across the Internet in the past few days, she never mentions sepcifically that she would not want to return to the Harry Potter movies. --Kevin Walter 10:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That started off as rumor and then it just exploded into being news. But its totally over analyzing what she said in the interview --Ewonline 19:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Birthplace

There is a video[1] on EW.net where Emma says she was born in France. I can't listen to sound right now, and I don't speak French, so please let me know if this is true or not, and if it is please add it to Emma's page. Stephe1987 09:43, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Checkout the archives for this dicussion page. Its been dicussed and concluded that she was very likely not born in the UK, so therefore she was probably born in France. --Ewonline 20:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, that's not something "concluded" within WP:V or outside WP:NOR. Please remember, everyone, this is an encyclopedia. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 20:16, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

Why was the picture deleted? We need a replacement in order to make it a good article. DavidJJJ 16:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Much to my continued disgust, see here. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 17:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the template of this article, there should ONLY be a picture of Hermione Granger in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix so leave it that way. --PJ Pete

Please see WP:FUC: we cannot use a character image to illustrate an actor and claim fair use. This was in effect before even the more stringent rewrite of policy. Sorry. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 05:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever uploaded the image of Emma Watson that shows her underwear, is NOT allowed on Wikipedia and is NOT true about Emma Watson's history. --PJ Pete

I've made a request to Wikimedia Commons, where that particular image was uploaded. Meantime, I must ask again that you read the new fair use policy; not only can we not use character images to illustrate actors and claim fair use, we can no longer use unfree images of anyone of whom a free image can be made—essentially, anyone still alive who remains in the public eye. This policy is too strict, in my opinion, but there it is. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 06:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion request page for that image is here. –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) 07:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That image is just a photoshop special, where that guy put emma's head on some random girl spreading her legs open. The original page is here, and as you translate, it shows that it is his "dream" to see Emma in her underwear, so that proves that this image is fake and NOT approiate for wikipedia. Was it ever inserted into the article? Karrmann 18:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

At least once. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 18:18, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of pictures can we use? That is, what would be considered free?
John Reaves 01:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, any image to which the copyright owner (usually, whoever took the picture) gives up all rights for use and reproduction, anywhere. I have a request in to a professional photographer who has captured many of the Potter cast, but no reply yet. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 01:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please contribute an image of Emma Watson, which is a promotional image. --PJ Pete

It cannot be simply promotional any more; per the new policy, if a person is living and in the public eye, an identifying image must be free. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 06:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. But not all images have to be free. For example, the article for William Clay Ford, Jr. is allowed to use a free use image, since Bill is not a real public personia, even though he is till alive. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Karrmann (talk • contribs) 20:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

That image could be removed at any time. There is nothing on the image page giving fair-use rationale as required by the template that the image is "exceptionally difficult to replace". The uploader needs to make the case for inclusion within the image page. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 21:09, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen Flickr pictures on other articles - when an image is uploaded to Flickr, is that effectively releasing it into the public domain? Could a Flickr picture be used here? RHB 22:44, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If the Flickr user owns the image they have uploaded (i.e., they took it themselves), and have chosen the option in Flickr for a Creative Commons license (or public domain), then it may be used here. --Kevin Walter 03:15, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This search shows photos licensed under Creative Commons and tagged with emma watson. Some are plainly taken from the films or of no use, but one or two are ok. RHB 16:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All are screenshots, blends, images of other images, do not contain sufficient data that the uploader is entitled to release the rights, or have "some rights reserved" attached. None is suitable without direct permission from the owner, sorry. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 21:16, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The picture of Emma that is presently on the article, is one of Hermione from one of the Harry Potter films, not an actual picture of Emma. I think that we need to find a more appropriate picture that is actually of Emma, not of her character. DavidJJJ 19:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can see this on fair use policy, as RadioKirk mentioned above. DavidJJJ 19:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia

I noticed that someone started a trivia section, but it got reverted with a tag saying "rv: no "trivia", sorry." Why can't there be trivia?

--Falconus|Talk 03:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:AVTRIV; in a nutshell, trivia makes something trivial. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 04:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]