User talk:...JohN...DoE...DeeR...JohN...

This is ...JohN...DoE...DeeR...JohN...'s talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bajram Begaj (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Locomotive207 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bajram Begaj and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bajram Begaj, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LocoMotive 1776 00:54, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ...JohN...DoE...DeeR...JohN...! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LocoMotive 1776 00:54, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bajram Begaj (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

independent sources might help

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bajram Begaj and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bajram Begaj, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:24, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bajram Begaj has been accepted

Bajram Begaj, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:48, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, ...JohN...DoE...DeeR...JohN...! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{chat with me}|_{contributions}) 14:50, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:03, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 104th Guards Airborne Regiment has been accepted

104th Guards Airborne Regiment, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 15:15, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 234th Guards Airborne Assault Regiment has been accepted

234th Guards Airborne Assault Regiment, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 15:20, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help desk IP question

Hi there, I happened to see your question at the help desk about being affected by an IP block. I am a checkuser and have access to some technical logs which most administrators don't, and I had a look for you. The IP you're using when you're experiencing the issue is blocked because it is a colocation centre (a "colo") according to our logs, and we regularly block these because they're often used for abuse. You might be connected to a colo if you're using a VPN service or other software that anonymizes your connection or makes it appear that you are editing from a different region. If you know you're running that kind of software, can you turn it off? (Our logs can't show if you're using an anonymizing program, but being connected to the blocked IP suggests that you are)

If you can turn that off and that lets you edit, that's a better solution than granting IP block exemption (IPBE) to your account, which would let you edit through an IP block but is time-limited. If turning off your anonymizing software doesn't solve the problem, or if you have no idea what I'm talking about, then post again here and I'll turn on IPBE for you. Thanks. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:50, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I think that was the issue as it works now that I have turned the VPN off....JohN...DoE...DeeR...JohN... (talk) 20:17, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]