Wikipedia:Historical archive/Votes for deletion/Lists

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RadicalBender (talk | contribs) at 20:45, 20 March 2004 (Keep all). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This page has been listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion. Please see that page for justifications and discussion.

Straw poll

Keep all:

  1. Kingturtle 19:28, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  2. Average Earthman 19:31, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  3. Nunh-huh 20:04, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  4. arj 20:07, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  5. Keep all. Davodd 20:23, Mar 20, 2004 (UTC)
  6. Alex S 20:25, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  7. Decumanus | Talk 20:26, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  8. Keep all, delete this page. RickK | Talk 20:42, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  9. RadicalBender 20:45, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Delete all:

Discussion on issue

  • Keep all unless specifically stated otherwise. This is a revenge nomination(s) and should be removed - Texture 17:49, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
    • not only you delete my lists, now you try to censor me! this isn't fair! 141 18:05, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
      • For the record, I voted to keep one of them. :P - Texture 18:12, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • Regardless of the motivation for listing these, some of them probably do deserve consideration. I recommend that we let the process work. Note to User:141: Are you or have you added the VfD notices to all these pages so the interested parties can participate in the debate? Rossami
    • I disagree. We cannot allow VfD do become a means for people who feel slighted to abuse the system. This page is now 175 Kb and has been almost completely unfunctional for some time. I pause before posting here anymore because I know that I will have to go through three or four edit conflicts before I can post. This abuse must stop. (Keep all.) RadicalBender 18:14, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • keep all I don't know about all of these articles, but they are being treated generically and this could lead to a permanent loss of valuable information. SimonMayer 18:49, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep all, for reasons mentioned above. --Mrwojo 18:59, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • This nomination is purely BJAODN — Sverdrup 19:07, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)


    • Keep all unless specifically stated otherwise. This is a revenge nomination(s) and should be removed - Texture 17:49, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
      • not only you delete my lists, now you try to censor me! this isn't fair! 141 18:05, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
        • For the record, I voted to keep one of them. :P - Texture 18:12, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
      • Regardless of the motivation for listing these, some of them probably do deserve consideration. I recommend that we let the process work. Note to User:141: Are you or have you added the VfD notices to all these pages so the interested parties can participate in the debate? Rossami
    • I disagree. We cannot allow VfD do become a means for people who feel slighted to abuse the system. This page is now 175 Kb and has been almost completely unfunctional for some time. I pause before posting here anymore because I know that I will have to go through three or four edit conflicts before I can post. This abuse must stop. (Keep all.) RadicalBender 18:14, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
    • Agreed w/RadicalBender. If I list Wikipedia for deletion will it be voted on or removed? It will be removed as an invalid candidate. Your motivation is very relevant to consideration. A nomination that you don't want deleted for a valid reason is not a valid nomination. - Texture 18:21, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
    • I agree with RadicalBender and Texture. 141 is behaving like a vexatious litigant, and I believe it's time we should start ignoring people who post frivolous VfD entries. -- Arwel 19:13, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)~
    • This is more like an attempt to sabotage the system than a sensible nomination. I vote keep all. If there are any that people think are particularly useless, nominate them in the normal fashion. But not en masse. Average Earthman 19:33, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep - useful and encyclopedic. - Texture 18:13, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep - sounds silly but isn't. --Hemanshu 20:07, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. who needs it? 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. who needs such a list? 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. who needs a list of things that don't exist anymore? 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. nobody needs it. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. nobody needs it. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. nobody needs it. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. nobody needs it. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. nobody needs it. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. nobody needs it. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. nobody needs it. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. irrelevant. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. unneeded. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. stupid. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. stupid. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. stupid. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. stupid. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. stupud. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. stupid. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. stupid. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. stupid. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. stupid. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. stupid. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. stupid. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. stupid. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. stupid. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. stupud. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. stupid. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. stupid. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. no need for such a list. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. stupid. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. encyclopedias don't have stupid lists. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. encyclopedias don't have stupid lists. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. irrelevant. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. irrelevant. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. who needs it? 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. probably fictious. I don't believe Albania produces films. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. nobody wants it. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. who cares about Poland? 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. irrelevant. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. irrelevant. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. irrelevant. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. irrelevant. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. irrelevant. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. Wikipedia shouldn't encourage the reading of banned books. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. who needs such info? 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. who cares about Poland? 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. Wikipedia is not a news site. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. they don't exist anymore, so nobody is willing to learn about these countries. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
    • Except every historian and anyone with interest in history. - Texture 17:51, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep - Texture 17:51, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. irrelevant. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. who cares about Laos? 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. irrelevant. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. irrelevant. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. ad. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. WIkipedia is not a dictionary. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. what's the point? 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. irrelevant. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. Stupid. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. irrelevant. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. only of local interest. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. irrelevant. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. probably fictious. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. irrelevant. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. silly 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. impossible to be NPOV. who defines what is important? 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. a silly list. 141 17:46, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)