Jump to content

Talk:Brett Lee

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Liver01 (talk | contribs) at 13:08, 12 April 2007 (What's with all this crap?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:CWC Advert

WikiProject iconBiography B‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconCricket B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cricket, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cricket articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This page has been marked as needing a taskforce assigned.
WikiProject Cricket To-do list:
Article assessment
Verifiability
Cleanup
Infoboxes
Cricket people
Cricket teams & countries
Images
On this day in cricket
Umpires
Women
Update
Other
WikiProject iconAustralia B‑class
WikiProject iconBrett Lee is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Brett Lee Pig Handler?

I have removed the reference that says Brett Lee was the a pig handler in the movie babe. On IMBD there are four listed Brett Lees. Two of them seem to be him, but can we verify that he was the pig handler? The reference to the Brett Lee in Babe does not contain any other information about him, unlike the Changing Rooms episode and a hosting job he has done. Even if it was Brett handling the animals, is it relevant as an outside interest? (DavidMSpeed 19 February 2006)

I think it's notable if he was, but I doubt it was. Lee would have been about 18-19 at the time of filming? Rogerthat Talk 11:07, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Issue on page

Something appears wrong with the batting style on the page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Miss coolgal (talkcontribs) 09:53, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Faster than Akhtar

The line although Lee is said to bowl consistently faster spells than Akhtar and is considered by many batsmen as the faster of the two. [2] in the lead had a fact tag which has now been replaced by a link to a Telegraph article. I can't see anything in the article which corroborates that.

It is currently a weasel word. Even if some batsmen did say that an opinion should have no place in the lead of the article. It is a fact that Akhtar has bowled faster than Lee and the rest are all points of view and impressions and opinions. If you look around long enough, you'll probably find 'somebody' who considers Harmison, Bond or even Sami or Mohammad Zahid as the 'fastest bowler'. Include such opinions in the main text but not in the lead. Tintin (talk) 05:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I cleaned out the artilce last month and it is now having random anecdotes there turning it inot hagiography.Blnguyen | rant-line 05:14, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's with all this crap?

This article was flowing nicely before all this helter-skelter editing! The article is all over the place. IMO, the older version was much better.