User talk:Walton One/Archive 7
|
Website for the basis of factswww.freewebs.com/majorleaguewiffle Letting you know about deletion reviewAn editor has asked for a deletion review of James_M._Branum. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jmbranum 00:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
DeletionThe deletion of the article "Major league wiffle" shouldn't have occured. The article was still being finished. It addressed the need for physical activity in a youths life and you should attempt to repel the deletion. It promotes the fun of a backyard game instead of most kids just playing video games. Let the article be finished before you delete it. You might have the power, don't abuse it. Thank YouThank you forpointing me in the right direction Adopt me Chaza93 19:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC) Done SO Chaza93 19:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC) My RfAThanks for the support on my RfA! I undertsand that there are a few concerns with my lack of edits, however I do plan on wkring on that, and reapplying in the future, as it appears this RfA will not go through. Wildthing61476 18:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC) I don't believe there was a clear consensus on how best to handle List of pronouncements of a critical period for the U.S. occupation of Iraq; several alternatives to deletion were being considered. Would you please reopen the discussion to allow the discussion to continue? I am asking you per the recommended procedure on WP:DP.--User At Work 21:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC) Speedy deletion: Anderson Farm articleHello, I created an article on the Anderson Farm Museum in Lively, Ontario but it has been speedily deleted. I think it is a notable subject since the museum is a part of the Lively community. Please advise what I should have done in order for it to remain a real (albeit short) article. (I'm a Wiki-noob). I noticed that you had communications with the author of the above on a similar article, High Court Express. My reaction to Udyog Nagari Express was either speedy or prod. Given your recent involment, maybe you could take a look at it. Thanks in advance. --Stormbay 01:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC) Semi-protectionPer Talk:Batman, here's a few more from my watchlist that should probably be semi-protected indefinitely:
Thanks for the suggestion. I like that two admins are involved, for transparency resons, if nothing else. - jc37 20:24, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
My Rfa
Re: RfA?Hi there! Thank you so much for your kind words. I was asked three or four times last fall if I would stand for RfA, and I declined because I knew there was so much I didn't yet know about this place. When you asked this time, I asked Samir to look over my history and give his candid opinion on the subject. He agrees with you and said he would co-nominate me, and I feel comfortable with the idea now... so let's do it! It's Memorial Day weekend over here and this event has my undivided, rapt attention on Sunday, but hopefully I'll have read all the admin stuff and have my part of the process ready by the middle of next week. Now I shall go study at the pillar of the Five Pillars. Should I let you know when I'm prepared or is there another procedure of which I'm unaware? Also, is it considered impolitic to notify the editors who asked me to stand for RfA in the past that I'm going to do it this time? I don't want to look like I'm canvassing because I would never do that, but I think they would like to know. Thanks again! - KrakatoaKatie 08:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Survived afd. Doc Glasgow is now ignoring consensus. Please resolve. - Kittybrewster (talk) My RFAMany thanks for your support at my RFA. It ended successfully and I am now a glorified janitor. If I can be of any assistance please don't hesitate to contact me through my talk page. Happy editing! —Ocatecir Talk 18:03, 27 May 2007 (UTC) Advice...Could you give me some advice? RFAThanks so much for aggressive supporting me in the RFA. I am grateful for your response, and it really means a lot to be appreciated. Thanks again! hmwithtalk 15:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC) BarnstarI have decided to start designing barnstars, please take a look Chaza93 17:44, 30 May 2007 (UTC) How do you tell how many edits you have made? Chaza93 20:26, 31 May 2007 (UTC) My RFARE: Jonjonbt's RFAThe premise (re: middle schoolers) that age shouldn't be a factor in RfAs doesn't hold water. Over and over again, in RfAs, you see the words "maturity" and "experience" raised, qualities seldom found in your average 11-14 year old. Nor do you see it in someone plainly wishing adminship with no other goal in mind than defending his pet article, and who recently vandalized the user page of another party in a content dispute. Beyond that, commentators in RfAs are in the business of judging the character, deportment and judgment of the nominees ... often on flimsy or knee-jerk grounds, generally with a shallow inquiry. I'm a lot more comfortable questioning someone's fitness to be an admin on the basis of maturity than I am on whether he or she has the "proper" number of edit summaries, the "proper" ratio of mainspace vs. Wikipedia edits, the "proper" number of anti-vandalism reverts, or whatever else happens to be the personal hobbyhorse of the editor passing judgment. RGTraynor 19:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC) RfCJust wanted to let you know that I opened an RfC on myself in response to the concerns raised during my RfA over my actions in the Gary Weiss dispute. The RfC is located here and I welcome any comments or questions you may have. CLA 12:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC) British Royal Family IncidentsFirst of all I am not soliciting for comment on an Afd. There is a page Aaron Barschak going through Afd at the moment. Its most likely not going to survive. but I am thinking of re-writing that article and call it Aaron Barschak Incident, he'll possibly have more (we're not a crystal ball). It was notable for a while and still much in living memory (I'm not a troll of Afds - if I think I can add useful argument I do), as is Michael Fagan. Can you think of any useful suggestions to add to a list of British Royal Family Incidents. I hate lists, and dont think they have a place outside of talk pages or sandbox. but it would help to group together a few articles together that I can write. Mike33 19:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!Re:Your RfA...Thanks so much for your support. I really hope it passes, obviously, but, if they believe I'm not ready, then, maybe, I'm not ready. I appreciate your willingness to nominate me the next time around, and I might take up that offer. Also... ![]()
Happy Birthday!Happy birthday, dear Walton!
YechielMan's RFAThank you for participating in either of my unsuccessful requests for adminship. Although the experience was frustrating, it showed me some mistakes I was making, and I hope to learn from those mistakes. Please take a few minutes to read User:YechielMan/Other stuff/RFA review and advise me how to proceed. Best regards. YechielMan 21:25, 4 June 2007 (UTC) My RfA ...Hi. Thanks for supporting my request for adminship. It was successful and I am now an admin. If I can ever be of help, please let me know. Cheers, Black Falcon (Talk) 06:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Monte NeHi, you posted an opinion peer review for the Monte Ne article. Since then the article has gone through considerable revision. Would you mind please taking a look at it at the article once more and leaving a new comment in the FA nomination that is going on right now. Thank you.--The_stuart 22:13, 7 June 2007 (UTC) Re:AwardThank you, Walton. That's extremely kind of you. Have a beautiful day :) Sincerely, Peacent 08:41, 8 June 2007 (UTC) So that's what the delete button looks like...I'm an admin! I'll send out another note in HTML later this weekend, but I wanted to tell you and Samir first. Thanks so much for your support and for giving me a final push! You rock! :-) - KrakatoaKatie 17:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC) RfA Thanks
Happy Walton's Day!
Well done, mate. bibliomaniac15 An age old question... 03:13, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Happy Walton day! Is this Walton Liverpool or On the Naze Essex? Or your surname. Two celebrations within a week is just too wikilove. But happy Walton day Mike33 15:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC) Hiya. You made, IMHO, a rather odd statement supporting a candidate on the premise that "not needing the tools" doesn't matter. I have also supported the candidate but challenged your logic within the RfA. Please don't take this badly at all, I'm just triying to clarify a seemingly odd statement for other editors viewing and commenting on the RfA - Cheers! Pedro | Chat 20:15, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
My RfA :)
Dear Mr. Walton! :)Yes, I got your email, my dearest Walton - and you have one now too! ;) Love, Phaedriel - 08:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC) re: SorryWalton, you certainly don't need to apologise to me, after all I'm not a target of WR. And I guess the mistake could happen to anyone. Best regards, —AldeBaer 16:51, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
RfA SuccessHow many edits would you need to be succesful, and how long would you need to be signed up for ? ¢нαzα93 Talk Contribs 17:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Thanks Walton ¢нαzα93 Talk Contribs 17:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC) re: QuestionNo, not the RfDs :) The discussion at Wikipedia talk:Main Page featured article protection. Probably should clarify that. Riana ⁂ 18:15, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Boink!Thank you so much, dear - you've got mail too :) Love, Phaedriel - 18:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Ck lostsword's RfA - Thanks
|