User talk:Allegrorondo

Welcome!

Hi Allegrorondo! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! -- Infrogmation 04:15, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

talk pages

Hi, Allegrorondo. There's no need to remove your comments from the talk pages once the request is fulfilled. We usually leave them there in case future readers find them helpful. --goethean ॐ 18:36, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Failure of John the Baptist

Hi. I replaced your speedy delete notice with a merge tag. Also I suggest you read Wikipedia:POV, because when it comes to religious ideas all there is is POV. Containing POV is not grounds for deletion, by the way, unless after 3.5 years at Wikipedia I have completely misunderstood article creation policy.

If you want to help, please locate the place in Wikipedia where this info aleady exists. You could mention it at talk:Failure of John the Baptist. Thanks. Uncle Ed 22:27, August 9, 2005 (UTC)

Schools

Please see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Duveneck School (2nd Nom.). This school is another non-notable school in Palo Alto with no significance outside the local community.Gateman1997 18:53, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Arthur Stanley Katz

I noticed you voted on this VfD. There are 7 others that are basically the same. I'm posting this note to everyone who voted for one and not the others, so we can get at least a consistent result when they are all processed. If you could vote on any of the below that you so far haven't I'd greatly appreciate it. Thanks:

At some point someone should hammer out a consistent policy on politicans of this vein, but until then case-by-case voting is king. Getting the same result across the board will be helpful for now. -R. fiend 23:30, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]