Wikipedia:Tutorial (historical)/Keep in mind/sandbox
 |  Welcome to the Wikipedia Tutorial sandbox! This page allows you to carry out experiments and practice editing. To edit, click the edit tab above, make your changes and click the Publish changes button when finished. Content will not stay permanently; this page is automatically cleaned every four hours. Please do not place copyrighted, offensive, illegal or libelous content in the sandboxes. For more information and resources on the basics needed to comprehend, comment on, and edit Wikipedia, see Contributing to Wikipedia. If you have any questions regarding Wikipedia, please ask them at the help desk or the Teahouse. If you have registered an account, and you are logged in, you can find or create your own user sandbox here. For future easy access, you can put |
Footnote testing
This is a brief introduction to yet another footnote proposal. Please see other articles listed at the end of this description to understand the context. Please note that this proposal is not a primary footnoting system proposal. This system is designed to complement other systems which provide automatic numbering by covering articles where automatic numbering does not work properly. The system is also designed to be very easily convertable to automatic numbering if automatic numbering systems improve in future.
Administrator note
Link test www.olney-newtonlink.com
The etiology of SARSds]] have confirmed that the virus causing SARS is indeed the new coronavirus. In the experiments, monkeys were infected with the coronavirus, and it was observed that they developed the same symptoms as human SARS victims.
Initially, electron microscopic examination in Hong Kong and Germany found viral particles with structures suggesting paramyxovirus in respiratory secretions of SARS patients; subsequently, in Canada, electron microscopic examination found viral particles with structures suggestive of metapneumovirus (a subtype of paramyxovirus) in respiratory secretions. Chinese researchers also reported that a chlamydia-like disease may be behind SARS. The Pasteur Institute in Paris identified coronavirus in samples taken from six patients. The CDC, however, noted viral particles in affected tissue (finding a virus in tissue rather than secretions suggests that it is actually pathogenic rather than an incidental finding). On electron microscopy, these tissue viral inclusions resembled coronaviruses, and comparison of viral genetic material obtained by PCR with existing genetic libraries suggested that the virus was a previously unrecognized coronavirus. Sequencing of the virus genome—which computers at the British Columbia Cancer Agency in Vancouver completed at 4 a.m. Saturday, April 12, 2003—was the first step toward developing a diagnostic test for the virus, and possibly a vaccine. [1] A test was developed for antibodies to the virus, and it was found that patients did indeed develop such antibodies over the course of the disease, which is very suggestive that the virus does have a causative role. It is generally agreed that this coronavirus has a causative role in SARS: continued study is underway to test the hypothesis that co-infection with other organisms such as human metapneumovirus may also play a role.
References
Template:AnbThe system is also designed to be very easily convertable to automatic numbering if automatic numbering systems improve in future. link title