Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ishkur's Guide to Electronic Music
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Babajobu (talk | contribs) at 04:28, 7 February 2006 (close discussion: keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 04:28, 7 February 2006 by Babajobu (talk | contribs) (close discussion: keep)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Babajobu 04:28, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is already linked in the relevant articles and does not warrent it's own. Alexa 300,000+ ∴ here…♠ 23:25, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- obviously i was wrong. feel free to close unanimous keep. i agree -- i expect people to know it, probably some repressed shame from ishkur's pictures of my raver days. keep it up. ∴ here…♠ 04:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - i'd argue that the site is rather notable in the online electronic dance music scene, especially when it comes to discussion on music genres --MilkMiruku 00:35, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It is listed with a nice explanation as the only external link on List_of_electronic_music_genres, why does it need it's own article? ∴ here…♠ 00:44, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep seems notable enough, 80K webhits. User:Αchille
- keep this site is indeed really known in all electronic genres and people with different interests I spoke with in the past knew this site (from experimantel 50s weirdness to modern jazzy music or dance music) --LimoWreck 13:48, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A notable resource in the definition and research of electronic music as a whole, as well as being pretty hilarious. Deleting this article would be a mistake. //User:DJRaveN4x
- Keep -Notable across the industry. It's niche, but it rises above nn Ronabop 02:36, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.