Jump to content

Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration program
Active1994–2006 (or FY95–FY07)[a]
BranchUsed by United States Army, Marine Corps, Navy, and Air Force
TypeDefense acquisition program
RoleReduce time to field improved technology, incorporate user into development process

The Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) program was a Department of Defense research and evaluation initiative for mature, advanced technology for United States military usage. These demonstrations allowed for cheaper and earlier evaluation of technology and systems than the formal acquisition process.[1]

An ACTD must be sponsored by an operational user, with approval and oversight from the now-terminated role of Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Advanced Systems and Concepts, or DUSD(AS&C), previously titled the Deputy USD for Advanced Technology, or DUSD(AT).[1][2]

The follow-on Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD) program was initiated by the deputy under-secretary in 2005.[2] The new JCTD framework emphasized multiservice technology development and improvements in planning. ACTDs were replaced by JCTDs during about a three year span from 2005 to 2008. During 2006, the final round of ACTDs were up for selection, and in September 2006 the winning projects received their formal approval.[3] All remaining ACTDs continued to be funded, though, and were expected to conclude by 2008.[2]

Lists of selected programs

[edit]

The following lists of ACTDs are separated into which year they were selected and approved during.

Fiscal year 1995

[edit]
ACTDs Selected in Fiscal Year 1995[1]
Fiscal Year[1] # Title Class* Total Expected Cost

(1995–2003: mil, K)

User/Sponsor Lead Service or Agency
Oct. 1994

(FY 1995)

1 Advanced Joint

Planning

I 40.5m[b] US Atlantic

Command

Defense Information

Systems Agency

2 Cruise Missile

Defense, Phase I

III 74.2m US Pacific

Command

Navy
3 High-Altitude

Endurance UAV

II 922.6m US Atlantic

Command

Air Force
4 Joint Countermine III 402.1m US Atlantic

Command

Navy
5 Kinetic Energy Boost-

Phase Intercept

II 40.0m Air Combat

Command

Air Force
6 Low-Life-Cycle-Cost

Medium-Lift Helicopter

II 800K Military Sealift

Command

Navy
7 Medium-Altitude

Endurance UAV (Predator)

II 128.4m US Atlantic

Command

Air Force
8 Precision/Rapid

Counter-MRL

III 86.3m US Forces Korea Army
9 Precision SIGINT

Targeting System

I 45.4m US Forces Korea Navy
10 Rapid Force

Projection Initiative

III 567.8m XVIIIth Airborne

Corps

Army
11 Synthetic Theater

of War

I 174.2m[c] US Atlantic

Command

None
*Class I = software development projects; class II = traditional platforms; class III = systems-of-systems

Abbreviations:

Fiscal year 1996

[edit]
ACTDs Selected in Fiscal Year 1996[1]
Fiscal Year[1] # Title Class* Total Expected Cost

(1995–2003: mil, K)

User/Sponsor Lead Service or Agency
Oct. 1995

(FY 1996)

1 Air Base/Port

Biological Detection

III 19.7m US Central

Command, US Pacific Command

Army
2 Battlefield Awareness

and Data Dissemination

I 113.4m US Atlantic

Command

Defense Information

Systems Agency

3 Combat Identification II 92.7m US Atlantic

Command

Army
4 Combat Vehicle

Survivability

II 48.6m III Corps Army
5 Counterproliferation I III 123.3m US European

Command

Air Force, Defense Special

Weapons Agency (DSWA)

6 Counter Sniper II 1.0m US Army

Infantry School

Army
7 Joint Logistics I 168.3m US Atlantic

Command, US European Command

Navy
8 Miniature Air-launched

Decoy

II 45.0m Air Combat

Command

Air Force
9 Navigation Warfare II 83.4m US Atlantic

Command

Air Force
10 Semi-Automated

IMINT Processing

I 123.2m US Atlantic

Command

Army, Air Force, DARPA,

National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA)

11 Tactical High-Energy

Laser

II 117.1m[d] Israeli Ministry

of Defense

Israel
12 Tactical UAV program II 131.3m Army, Navy,

Marine Corps

Army
*Class I = software development projects; class II = traditional platforms; class III = systems-of-systems

Abbreviations:

Fiscal year 1997

[edit]
ACTDs Selected in Fiscal Year 1997[1]
Fiscal Year[1] # Title Class* Total Expected Cost

(1995–2003: mil, K)

User/Sponsor Lead Service or Agency
Oct. 1996

(FY 1997)

1 Chemical Add-On to

Air Base/Port Biological Detection

III 3.2m US Central

Command, US Pacific Command

Army
2 Consequence

Management

II 3.2m Army, Marine

Corps

Army, Marine Corps
3 Counter-

proliferation II

III 303.0m US European

Command

Air Force, Navy
4 Extending the Littoral

Battlespace

III 137.7m US Pacific

Command

Marine Corps
5 Information

Operations Planning Tool

I 55.1m US Central

Command

Air Force
6 Integrated Collection

Management

I 12.2m US Atlantic

Command

Defense Intelligence

Agency (DIA)

7 Joint Advanced Health

and Usage Monitoring System

II 15.5m n.a. Navy
8 Military Operations in

Urban Terrain

III 71.9m US Special

Operations Command (USSOCOM)

Army
9 Rapid Terrain

Visualization

II 54.6m XVIIIth Airborne

Corps

Army
*Class I = software development projects; class II = traditional platforms; class III = systems-of-systems

Abbreviations:

Fiscal year 1998

[edit]
ACTDs Selected in Fiscal Year 1998[1]
Fiscal Year[1] # Title Class* Total Expected Cost

(1995–2003: mil, K)

User/Sponsor Lead Service or Agency
Oct. 1997

(FY 1998)

1 Adaptive Course of

Action

I 19.3m US Atlantic

Command, US Pacific Command

Defense Information

Systems Agency

2 C4I for Coalition

Warfare

I 20.0m US European

Command

Army
3 High Power

Microwave

II 2.0m US European

Command

Army
4 Information Assur-

ance: Automated Intrusion Detection Environment

I 75.1m US Strategic

Command

Defense Information

Systems Agency

5 Joint Biological

Remote Early Warning System

III 125.7m US European

Command

Army
6 Joint Continuous

Strike Environment

I 15.9m US European

Command

Defense Information

Systems Agency

7 Joint Modular Lighter

System

II 26.5m US Atlantic

Command

Navy
8 Line-of-Sight Anti-

tank

II 257.9m US Central

Command

Army
9 Link 16 (tactical data

network for NATO)

I 3.3m US Atlantic

Command

Navy
10 Migration Defense

Intelligence Threat Data System

I 11.4m US European

Command

Defense Intelligence

Agency (DIA)

11 Precision Targeting

Identification

II 23.0m[e] JIATF East

(Joint Inter- agency Task Force East)

Navy
12 Space-Based

Space Surveillance Operations

I 21.5m US Space

Command

Air Force
13 Theater Precision

Strike Operations

I 93.4m US Forces Korea Army
14 Unattended Ground

Sensors

II 20.8m US Central

Command, US Special Operations Command (USSOCOM)

Air Force
*Class I = software development projects; class II = traditional platforms; class III = systems-of-systems

Abbreviations:

Although not represented in this section, additional ACTDs indeed followed those listed above (during FY 1999–2006).[2][4]

Congressional Budget Office assessments

[edit]

Some of the Congressional Budget Office assessments, such as the CBO 1998 Memorandum,[1] reviewed the ACTD program's progress since its initiation in 1994 up until the 1998 assessment. The memorandum summarized the results as "From 1995 through 1998, DoD has spent $3.2 billion on 46 ACTDs. The $3.2 billion represents about 2 percent of DoD’s entire budget for research and development during that time." The memorandum provided some details about the 46 ACTDs as of 1998, and highlighted the Medium-Altitude Endurance UAV (the Predator drone) as on its then successes, having transitioned into a formal DOD Acquisition Program.

Outcomes

[edit]

The following programs were completed under the Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration framework:

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ FY07 ACTD planning had happened two years in advance, from candidacy in Dec. 2005 to Sept 2006 approval, in time for activation just before FY07 (i.e. Oct. 2006 to Sept 2007).
  2. ^ Includes $5.2 million added from fiscal year 1996 funds, i.e. the next year.
  3. ^ Excludes an additional $4.6 million to be provided by the United Kingdom.
  4. ^ Excludes an additional $64.7 million to be provided by Israel.
  5. ^ Excludes an additional $2.4 million to be provided by the United Kingdom.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k "The Department Of Defense's Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrations" (PDF). Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC. September 1998. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 November 2016. Retrieved 16 May 2025.
  2. ^ a b c d "OSD RDT&E Budget item justification (R2 Exhibit)" (PDF). apps.dtic.mil (Defense Technical Information Center = DTIC). February 2008. p. 1. Archived from the original on 26 May 2025. Retrieved 26 May 2025. It is anticipated that all ongoing ACTDs will be complete by FY09.
  3. ^ Peterson, Mark (18 April 2006). "Microsoft PowerPoint - Peterson NDIA ACTD Brief April 2006-Public.ppt" (PDF). ndia.dtic.mil (National Defense Industrial Association = NDIA | Defense Technical Information Center = DTIC). Director, Program Resources & Integration, Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), DDR&E/AS&C (Advanced Systems & Concepts). pp. 7, 9. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 December 2024. Retrieved 26 May 2025. JCTD First introduced in the FY 2006 President's Budget"; "FY07 ACTD Candidates Submitted [in] Dec [2005] (__Note__): FY08 programs are referred to as ACTDs instead of JCTDs due to pending nature of the JCTD program, circa April 2006. Presumably once approved, it would have been updated to match. (__Editor Note__)
  4. ^ "[FY 1995 to FY 2009] Joint Capability Technology Demonstrations (JCTD) | JCTD website". acq.osd.mil (Acqusition, Office of Secretary of Defense = OSD). July 2009. Archived from the original on 25 July 2009. Retrieved 26 May 2025.
  5. ^ a b Drezner, Jeffrey A.; Leonard, Robert S. (January 2002). "Innovative Development: Global Hawk and DarkStar: Their Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrator Program Experience, Executive Summary". RAND. Retrieved 2 May 2012.
  6. ^ Benney, Richard; et al. "The Joint Precision Airdrop System Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration" (PDF). www.aiaa.org. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Retrieved 1 May 2012.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]