Draft:Inbox Pictures
| Submission declined on 28 April 2025 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 15 March 2025 by Spiderone (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Spiderone 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 10 March 2025 by ProClasher97 (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by ProClasher97 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 8 March 2025 by HitroMilanese (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by HitroMilanese 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 7 March 2025 by Theroadislong (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Theroadislong 2 months ago.
| |
Comment: Note Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inbox Pictures. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:15, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Now also at Draft:Inbox Pictures Pvt Ltd. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:15, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Borderline WP:G11 Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:02, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Amazon is not an independent source. Theroadislong (talk) 13:44, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Inbox Pictures, founded by Sajid Qureshi[1], is a film production and distribution company that focuses on bringing new stories to the big screen. Over the years, the company has worked on producing Bollywood films and acquiring Hindi-language rights for many South Indian movies. With a focus on storytelling and consistent hard work, Inbox Pictures[2] has made its place in the Indian film industry..
Filmography
[edit]Many projects are being helmed under the banner of Inbox Pictures. The lineup of the films is to be released in the year 2022. Hindi Film titled InCar[3], thriller made with national award winner actress Ritika Singh in the lead role and directed by Harsha Vardhan[4] the Hindi version of Akhanda[5]. Next Film Bad Boy[6] is one of his upcoming Hindi romance comedies directed by Rajkumar Santoshi[7] and starring a lead pair Namashi Chakraborty.
| Films | Role |
|---|---|
| Bhairavam | Producer |
| Films | Role |
|---|---|
| Lal Salaam | Producer |
| Aranmanai 4 | Producer |
| Vettaiyan | Producer |
| Shabdham | Producer |
| Bheema | Producer |
Looking ahead, Inbox Pictures aims to expand its reach with innovative projects, collaborations, and strategic partnerships in both film production and distribution. With a strong foundation and a visionary leader at the helm, the company is poised to shape the future of Bollywood cinema.
Reference
[edit]- "Inbox Pictures Announces New Bollywood Project". Bollywood Hungama. 2024-03-10. Retrieved 2025-03-15.
- "The 'Akhanda' Fever Hits the Nation!". timesofindia. etimes.in. Jan 10, 2023. Retrieved Feb 23, 2023.
- "InCar: Ritika Singh unveils the first look from her upcoming film". indiaforums. Team India Forums. February 16, 2023. Retrieved March 10, 2025.
- "Namashi Chakraborty on working with Rajkumar Santoshi in his ." Timesofindia. IANS. April 20, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2025.
Adding References (Citations)
[edit]- Inbox Pictures was founded by Sajid Qureshi, a renowned producer in the Indian film industry.[8]
External links
[edit]- Official Website
- Sajid Qureshi IMDb Profile
- Inbox Pictures on Bollywood Hungama
- Inbox Pictures YouTube Channel
- "Inbox Pictures' Latest Film". Bollywood Hungama. 2024-03-10. Retrieved 2025-03-15.
- "Bad Boy Film Review". The Times of India. 2023-12-05. Retrieved 2025-03-15.
- ^ "Sajid Qureshi | Producer, Writer, Director". IMDb. Retrieved 2025-04-28.
- ^ "Google Search". www.google.com. Retrieved 2025-04-28.
- ^ "InCar Day 1 Box Office Collection: Ritika Singh's Survival Film Fails Miserably In All Languages!". www.filmibeat.com. 2023-03-04. Retrieved 2025-04-28.
- ^ "Google Search". www.google.com. Retrieved 2025-04-28.
- ^ "Akhanda", Wikipedia, 2025-04-06, retrieved 2025-04-28
- ^ "Namashi Chakraborty's rowdy dance and Amrin Qureshi's prettiness in 'Bad Boy' teaser, rings in the Holi ardour". The Times of India. 2023-03-07. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 2025-04-28.
- ^ "Rajkumar Santoshi - Google Search". www.google.com. Retrieved 2025-04-28.
- ^ "Inbox Pictures Announces New Bollywood Project". Bollywood Hungama. 2024-03-10. Retrieved 2025-03-15.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.