Submission declined on 11 June 2025 by Theroadislong (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by Theroadislong 16 days ago. Last edited by Deor 16 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Comment: Unsourced but not even clear what the topic is? "a sticky table begins'? Theroadislong (talk) 16:17, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Comment: In accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, I disclose that I have been paid by my employer for my contributions to this article. 92.17.23.5 (talk) 16:02, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Massalaatoq is a research station in Sisimiut, Greenland. It is known for its evidence, as a sticky table begins.

Description

Massalaatoq was first founded in 20 December 2004, as it begins. Then in another 20 December in 2014, it is almost built, and now, in 20 December 2024, the research station is finished.^[1]

List

Massalaatoq
Massalaatoq
Demonym(s)	Greenlandic

Greenland
Greenland
	Flag
Demonym(s)	Greenlandic

Massalaatoq
Massalaatoq
Research Station
	Landscape of Massalaatoq
	Massalaatoq Location within Greenland
	Coordinates: 66°56′20″N 53°40′20″W / 66.93889°N 53.67222°W
First founded	20 December 2004
First founded	20 December 2014
First founded	20 December 2024

Massalaatoq
Flag
Demonym(s)	Faroese

Massalaatoq
Flag
Demonym(s)	Danish
Today part of	Denmark

References

^ The first archive on Earth.[1]

[1] The first archive on Earth.[1]

[1]