Draft:Minimum detectable activity
Submission declined on 26 May 2025 by Tarlby (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Minimum detectable activity (MDA) is the lowest activity of a radioactive nuclide that can be detected with a detector system, given a particular confidence level[1]. It is a concept that can be used in several circumstances, such as in whole-body counting or monitoring atmospheric radionuclides[2], to determine the presence or absence of a radioactive substance or compare the performance of detector systems.
When it comes to gamma spectroscopy, the minimum detectable activity can be written as
,
where ins the detection limit in units of counts, is the detection efficiency of the gamma spectrometer at the particular gamma-ray energy, is the probability of emission for the gamma ray, and is the live time of the measurement[1]. The formula for changes depending on the confidence level. For a confidence level of 95%,
,
where is the uncertainty in background counts in a region-of-interest around the ramma-ray energy. If is the number of background counts in the region-of-interest, it can be shown that [1].
References
[edit]- ^ a b c Gilmore, Gordon (2011). Practical gamma-ray spectrometry (2., repr. with corr ed.). Chichester: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-86196-7.
- ^ Britton, R.; Davies, A. V.; Burnett, J. L.; Jackson, M. J. (1 August 2015). "A high-efficiency HPGe coincidence system for environmental analysis". Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 146: 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.03.033. ISSN 0265-931X.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.