Draft:NeuroBranding
![]() | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,797 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 17 May 2025 by Asilvering (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 13 May 2025 by BuySomeApples (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner. Declined by BuySomeApples 17 days ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 13 May 2025 by GoldRomean (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by GoldRomean 18 days ago. | ![]() |
Neurobranding is a field of study that applies findings from neuroscience and psychology to brand development, management, and customer engagement.[1] It seeks to understand how consumers' brains respond to brand elements, including logos, advertisements, packaging, and storytelling, through methods like neuroimaging, biometric measurements, and psychological analysis.[2][3]
Neurobranding is distinct from neuromarketing in that it specifically focuses on the long-term cognitive and emotional connections between consumers and brands, rather than just optimizing short-term advertising effectiveness.[4]
Background
[edit]Neurobranding developed as an offshoot of neuromarketing research in the early 2000s, building on studies that explored how emotional responses and memory formation influence brand perception. Unlike traditional branding, which often relies on intuition and qualitative feedback, neurobranding is grounded in empirical data from neuroscience, psychology, and behavioral economics. It aims to identify the specific neural pathways and cognitive triggers that drive brand loyalty and customer preference.[5]
Research Methods
[edit]Neurobranding research employs a range of scientific tools and methods to measure the brain's responses to brand stimuli:
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) – measures brain activity by detecting changes in blood flow, providing insights into emotional and cognitive processing during brand exposure.
Electroencephalography (EEG) – records electrical activity in the brain, capturing immediate neural reactions to brand imagery and messaging.
Biometric Sensors – track physiological responses like heart rate, skin conductance, and pupil dilation to gauge emotional arousal and engagement.
Eye Tracking – monitors visual attention and focus to assess how consumers interact with brand elements in real time.
Rapid Implicit Association Testing (RIAT) – measures subconscious brand associations by analyzing reaction times to specific prompts and stimuli.[6]
Notable Research
[edit]Several foundational studies have shaped the field of Neurobranding:
McClure et al. (2004) conducted one of the first fMRI studies demonstrating that brand knowledge can alter sensory perception. Participants in the study showed significantly different brain responses when tasting branded versus unbranded cola, highlighting the role of memory and brand associations in shaping consumer preferences.[7]
Hasson et al. (2004) demonstrated that compelling narratives can synchronize brain activity between speakers and listeners, suggesting a neurological basis for brand storytelling.[8]
Paul J. Zak's research at Claremont Graduate University has explored the role of oxytocin in trust formation, revealing that emotional engagement can significantly impact brand loyalty and customer retention.[9]
Antonio Damasio's (2005) work on the somatic marker hypothesis has influenced how brands approach emotional branding, emphasizing the critical role of emotional processing in decision-making.
Applications and Limitations
[edit]Neurobranding has been applied in industries ranging from consumer electronics to luxury goods, where deep emotional connections are crucial for long-term brand success. However, practical applications face several limitations:
- Small sample sizes in neuroimaging studies, which can limit generalizability
- Artificial laboratory environments that may not reflect real-world consumer behavior
- High costs associated with advanced neuroimaging equipment
- Ethical concerns related to privacy and the manipulation of subconscious behavior
Criticism
[edit]Neurobranding, like its parent field neuromarketing, has faced skepticism from academics and industry professionals:
Butler (2008) argued that many commercial applications lack scientific rigor and overpromise their effectiveness.[10]
Ariely and Berns (2010) cautioned against oversimplifying complex neural processes in business contexts.[11]
Knutson and Karmarkar (2017) noted the gap between controlled laboratory findings and real-world purchasing behavior.[12]
Satel and Lilienfeld (2013) warned against "neuromania" – the overinterpretation of brain scan results for marketing purposes.[13]
Ethical Concerns
[edit]Ethical debates around neurobranding often focus on privacy, consent, and the potential for manipulation. Critics argue that using neuroscience to influence consumer behavior raises moral questions, particularly when targeting vulnerable populations or exploiting subconscious decision-making processes.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- McClure, Samuel M.; Li, Jian; Tomlin, Damon; Cypert, Kim S.; Montague, Latané M.; Montague, P. Read (2004). "Neural Correlates of Behavioral Preference for Culturally Familiar Drinks". Neuron. 44 (2): 379–387.
- Hasson, Uri; Nir, Yuval; Levy, Ifat; Fuhrmann, Galit; Malach, Rafael (2004). "Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision". Science. 303 (5664): 1634–1640.
- Zak, Paul J. (2017). Trust Factor: The Science of Creating High-Performance Companies. AMACOM.
- Damasio, Antonio (2005). Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Penguin Books.
- Butler, Michael J.R. (2008). "Neuromarketing and the perception of knowledge". Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 7 (4–5): 415–419.
- Ariely, Dan; Berns, Gregory S. (2010). "Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business". Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 11 (4): 284–292.
- Knutson, Brian; Karmarkar, Uma R. (2017). "Measuring neural predictors of purchasing behavior". Current Opinion in Psychology. 17: 89–95.
- Satel, Sally; Lilienfeld, Scott O. (2013). Brainwashed: The Seductive Appeal of Mindless Neuroscience. Basic Books
Notable Publications
[edit]Published works on neurobranding include:
- Steidl, Peter. *Neurobranding: Strategies for Shaping Consumer Behavior*. Books by SplitShops, 2015.
- Vick, Rande. *NeuroBranding: The Brain-Based Method to Make Your Brand Unforgettable*. KDP, 2025.
References
[edit]- ^ KedarRele, Deepa; Kharate, Sunita; Magar, Anshuman; Gawande, Rupali; Hadole, Sachin (2024-09-23). "An empirical study of the impact of Neurobranding applications used by Amul on consumer buying behavior". Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications (JoCAAA). 33 (4): 254–264. ISSN 1572-9206.
- ^ Upadhyaya, Makarand (2020-02-28). "An investigation on neuro branding through social media as an emerging marketing tool". AIP Conference Proceedings. 1st International Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, Materials and Technologies. 2207 (1): 040008. Bibcode:2020AIPC.2207d0008U. doi:10.1063/5.0000295. ISSN 0094-243X.
- ^ Šola, Hedda Martina; Khawaja, Sarwar; Qureshi, Fayyaz Hussain (2025-04-09). "Neuroscientific Analysis of Logo Design: Implications for Luxury Brand Marketing". Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland). 15 (4): 502. doi:10.3390/bs15040502. ISSN 2076-328X. PMC 12024241. PMID 40282124.
- ^ Yarosh, Olga (2019-01-01). "Neurobranding in territorial development: From traditional to innovative". Proceedings of the International Scientific-Practical Conference "Business Cooperation as a Resource of Sustainable Economic Development and Investment Attraction" (ISPCBC 2019). doi:10.2991/ISPCBC-19.2019.76. ISBN 978-94-6252-767-6.
- ^ Yarosh, Olga (August 2019). "Neurobranding in territorial development: From traditional to innovative". Proceedings of the International Scientific-Practical Conference "Business Cooperation as a Resource of Sustainable Economic Development and Investment Attraction" (ISPCBC 2019). Atlantis Press. pp. 331–333. doi:10.2991/ispcbc-19.2019.76. ISBN 978-94-6252-767-6.
- ^ "RIAT in neuromarketing | Neurensics Neuro Market Research Company". www.neurensics.com. Retrieved 2025-05-13.
- ^ McClure, Samuel M.; Li, Jian; Tomlin, Damon; Cypert, Kim S.; Montague, Latané M.; Montague, P. Read (2004-10-14). "Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks". Neuron. 44 (2): 379–387. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.019. ISSN 0896-6273. PMID 15473974.
- ^ Stephens, Greg J.; Silbert, Lauren J.; Hasson, Uri (2010-08-10). "Speaker–listener neural coupling underlies successful communication". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 107 (32): 14425–14430. Bibcode:2010PNAS..10714425S. doi:10.1073/pnas.1008662107. PMC 2922522. PMID 20660768.
- ^ Barraza, Jorge A.; Hu, Xinbo; Terris, Elizabeth T.; Wang, Chuan; Zak, Paul J. (2021-11-30). "Oxytocin increases perceived competence and social-emotional engagement with brands". PLOS ONE. 16 (11): e0260589. Bibcode:2021PLoSO..1660589B. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260589. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 8631632. PMID 34847200.
- ^ Butler, Michael J.R. (2008-07-30). "Neuromarketing and the perceptions of knowledge". Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 7 (4/5): 415–419. doi:10.1002/cb.260. ISSN 1472-0817.
- ^ Ariely, Dan; Berns, Gregory S. (April 2010). "Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business". Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 11 (4): 284–292. doi:10.1038/nrn2795. ISSN 1471-0048. PMC 2875927. PMID 20197790.
- ^ Knutson, Brian; Genevsky, Alexander (2018-04-01). "Neuroforecasting Aggregate Choice". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 27 (2): 110–115. doi:10.1177/0963721417737877. ISSN 0963-7214. PMC 5892847. PMID 29706726.
- ^ Lilienfeld, Sally Satel, Scott O. (2013-06-08). "Pop neuroscience is bunk!". Salon. Retrieved 2025-05-13.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.