Draft:Sushant Subedi
| Submission declined on 16 May 2025 by Fade258 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 14 April 2025 by Significa liberdade (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Significa liberdade 55 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 4 April 2025 by Sophisticatedevening (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Sophisticatedevening 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 2 April 2025 by RangersRus (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by RangersRus 2 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 29 March 2025 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Theroadislong 2 months ago. | |
Comment: Yet to meet notability standards. It lacks relaible and independent references to the subject. Most of the mentioned references is directly connects to the subject. Fade258 (talk) 05:14, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: At present, none of the sources are independent, meaning they do not work toward establishing notability, which is how we determine which subjects are worthy of a Wikipedia article. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:56, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: No changes since last decline, sources are still generally unreliable, and still no evidence of notability. Sophisticatedevening🍷(talk) 13:46, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: sources are absolutely NOT suitable! Theroadislong (talk) 17:05, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Sushant Subedi is an analyst at UK Finance.[1][2][3] He holds an MPA in Innovation, Public Policy and Public Value from University College London, and a BSc (Econ) from the London School of Economics [4][5]
- ^ "Gen-AI training". UK Finance.
- ^ "Responsible AI in recruitment guidance from the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT)". UK Finance.
- ^ "UK Finance response to AI Whitepaper: a pro innovation approach to AI regulation". UK Finance.
- ^ "Sushant Subedi". sushantsubedi.academia.edu.
- ^ "Sushant Subedi". UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. March 1, 2023.
- ^ "Sushant Subedi". March 2023.
- ^ "The digital divide in education: Policy lessons from the pandemic". Social Policy. August 26, 2020.
- ^ "Responsible AI in recruitment guidance from the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT)".
- ^ "Sushant Subedi". scholar.google.com.
- ^ "Sushant SUBEDI | Masters of Public Administration | University College London, London | UCL | Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose | Research profile".
- ^ "Sushant Subedi - UK Finance | LinkedIn".