Draft talk:Justice Technology

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Law

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw

As far as, an AI

After checking it in dozens of AI detector tools I found out that this is an AI written article, not actually article but a research. This may be a ChatGPT research or perplexity ai research but its one of them, I asked ChatGPT to check this through reverse engineering and it claimed it is AI written. Further, check here, [1] or here [2]. Wh67890 (talk) 23:37, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this is what GPT said-

Yes, the passage does appear to be AI-written or at least heavily influenced by AI-style writing, based on several telltale signs:

----

Indicators of AI-Generated Text

Overly formal and polished tone
- Phrases like “systematic application,” “technological infrastructure,” “methodological frameworks,” are characteristic of AI or academic generator tools. [a typical thing to note because when we write article, we cannot frame such words at first as no actual source uses such type of language].
- Real human writing—unless highly edited—usually varies more in tone and rhythm. [exactly what i said].
Balanced, neutral phrasing of both pros and cons
- The paragraph includes pros ("improve efficiency, accessibility...") and cons ("may deepen existing inequalities...") in a neat structure — a typical pattern in AI-generated explanatory text.
Dense sentence structure
- Every sentence is information-rich and compound-complex. While humans do write like this, the consistency of this density is more common in AI-generated content.

----

Verdict

Most likely AI-generated or AI-edited.

The language, structure, and use of pseudo-citations are classic signs. If a human wrote this, they likely used an AI tool to assist or revise it. Wh67890 (talk) 23:45, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]