Ji Shao
Ji Shao | |
|---|---|
| 嵇紹 | |
.jpg?lang=en) | |
| Palace Attendant (侍中) | |
| In office 301–304 | |
| Monarch | Emperor Hui of Jin |
| Personal details | |
| Born | 253 Suixi County, Anhui |
| Died | c.9 September 304 Anyang, Henan |
| Relations | Ji Han (cousin) |
| Children | Ji Zhen |
| Parent | Ji Kang (father) |
| Courtesy name | Yanzu (延祖) |
| Peerage | Viscount of Yiyang |
| Posthumous name | Zhongmu (忠穆) |
Ji Shao (253 – c.9 September 304[1]), courtesy name Yanzu, was a politician of the Jin dynasty (266–420). He was the son of Ji Kang, one of the Seven Sages of the Bamboo Grove. Although his father was wrongfully killed by the ruling Sima clan, Ji Shao rose to become a prominent minister within the Western Jin court, reaching the position of Palace Attendant. He became embroiled in the War of the Eight Princes and immortalized himself by sacrificing his life to protect Emperor Hui of Jin at the Battle of Dangyin. Opinions on Ji Shao varied among contemporary and later scholars; he was praised for his exceptional loyalty to the emperor at Dangyin, but also criticized for going against the Confucian principle of filial piety by serving the family that killed his father.
Early life and career
[edit]Ji Shao was the son of Ji Kang, a member of the famous Seven Sages of the Bamboo Grove. In 263, when he was ten years old, his father was falsely accused and killed under the order of the Cao Wei regent, Sima Zhao. For his safety, Ji Shao stayed in his home for the rest of his youth, where he gained a reputation being filial towards his mother. In 266, Sima Zhao's son, Sima Yan, posthumously known as Emperor Wu of Jin, established the Western Jin dynasty after forcing the last emperor of Wei to abdicate. In 274, Ji Kang's friend, Shan Tao advised Emperor Wu to exempt Ji Shao from his father's crime and appoint him as an Assistant in the Palace Library. The emperor agreed, but took one step further by giving him the higher rank of Assistant Director. Ji Shao wanted to turn down the appointment, but after a personal visit from Shan Tao, he finally agreed.[2]
Ji Shao was eventually promoted to Administrator of Ruyin Commandery. He was then transferred to the Interior Minister of Yuzhang Commandery, but as his mother had died around the time, he declined the position. After concluding his mourning period, he returned to the government as Inspector of Xu province, where he met with the provincial chief controller, Shi Chong. Shi Chong was known to have an arrogant personality, but Ji Shao would often reason with him, which earned him Shi Chong's respect. Afterwards, Ji Shao had to resign once again to mourn the death of his eldest son, Ji Zhen (嵇軫).[3]
War of the Eight Princes
[edit]Service under Empress Jia and Sima Lun
[edit]In 291, Ji Shao was reinstated as a Gentleman Attendant at the Palace Gate. By this time, Emperor Hui of Jin had succeeded Emperor Wu to the throne, but the imperial court was dominated by his wife, Empress Jia Nanfeng and her relative Jia Mi. Jia Mi wanted to befriend Ji Shao, but he did not respond. When the Jia clan was overthrown by the Prince of Zhao, Sima Lun in May 300, Ji Shao was thus spared and promoted to Regular Mounted Attendant while holding the position of State Academician. He was also enfeoffed as the Viscount of Yiyang.[4]
In February 301, Sima Lun deposed Emperor Hui and usurped the throne. The Book of Jin states that after the usurpation, Sima Lun appointed Ji Shao as a Palace Attendant, which he accepted.[5] However, the Spring and Autumn Annals of the Thirty Kingdoms (三十國春秋) provides a lengthier and different account. It states that when Sima Lun was about to usurp the throne, Ji Shao was approached by the Prince of Yiyang, Sima Wei (not to be confused with the Prince of Chu with a similar-sounding name, who is his third cousin), who showed him Emperor Hui's edict of abdication. When asked for his thought, Ji Shao replied, "Even if I die, I will never recognize another emperor!" Sima Wei angrily drew his sword at him and backed off. After Emperor Hui was sent to Jinyong Fortress (金墉城; northwestern part of Luoyang city), Ji Shao followed him and refused to deal with Sima Lun, which caused many people to worry for his safety.[6]
Service under Sima Jiong
[edit]By July 301, Sima Lun was deposed and Emperor Hui was restored by the Prince of Qi, Sima Jiong. Ji Shao was again spared and remained in the government as a Palace Attendant. Soon, several officials wanted to posthumously reinstate the minister, Zhang Hua, who fell victim to Sima Lun's purges, to his office of Minister of Works. Ji Shao opposed them, asserting that Zhang Hua did little to prevent Empress Jia from seizing power and was even compliant with her undertakings. He instead argued that Zhang Hua should not be acquitted for his crimes, but out of leniency, the matter should not be pursued any further. He then submitted a petition addressed to Emperor Hui, Sima Jiong and the Prince of Chengdu, Sima Ying, encouraging them to rebuild and prevent calamity from befalling the state.[7]
Sima Jiong, now regent to Emperor Hui, was close friends with Ji Shao and showed him preferential treatment.[8] However, Ji Shao was concern for the prince's extravagant lifestyle as he built many buildings for his personal estate. He wrote a petition remonstrating Sima Jiong to stop, but although Jiong humbly responded, he did not change his behaviour.[9] One day, Ji Shao visited Sima Jiong to consult politics. Jiong was holding a banquet at the time, so Ji Shao had to join and discuss current affairs with the prince's other confidants, Dong Ai (董艾) and Ge Qi (葛旗). Hearing that Ji Shao was talented in music and poetry, Dong Ai offered him a zither to play, but he refused, believing it inapproriate for him to be act like a performer while he was on official duty. He also warned Sima Jiong that as a highly important minister, he should be setting an example. Jiong felt ashame, while Dong Ai and the others felt awkward and left.[10]
In January 303, Ji Shao was relieved of his duty in court and invited by Sima Jiong to serve as his Marshal of the Left. However, ten days later, Sima Jiong was killed while fighting the Prince of Changsha, Sima Ai in Luoyang. When the fighting first broke out, Ji Shao sensed that something was amiss and fled towards the palace. Supposedly, a crossbowman at the eastern pavilion spotted him and wanted to shoot him, but his fellow soldier, Xiao Long (蕭隆), upon seeing Ji Shao's appearance, felt that he was no ordinary man, so he personally stepped forward to snatch away the bolt, saving Ji Shao's life.[11]
Service under Sima Ai
[edit]After Sima Jiong's death, Ji Shao decided to return to his old home in Xingyang. He was later invited to serve as Assistant to the Imperial Counsellor, but he declined and instead retained his position of Palace Attendant. In fall 303, Sima Ying and the Prince of Hejian, Sima Yong declared war against Sima Ai and placed him under siege at Luoyang. When Sima Ai was about to attack Sima Yong's forces in the west, he asked his followers who should be the commander. His generals and soldiers all elected Ji Shao to lead them into battle, so he was appointed General Who Pacifies the West and granted tally.[12]
Despite holding out for several months, Sima Ai was eventually betrayed by the Prince of Donghai, Sima Yue and burnt to death by Sima Yong's general, Zhang Fang in March 304. At first, Ji Shao was restored to his position as Palace Attendant, but as many of the other officials went to Ye to apologize to Sima Ying, he was among the few to be dismissed and demoted to commoner status.[13]
.jpg?lang=en)
Battle of Dangyin and death
[edit]In August 304, Sima Yue rebelled against Sima Ying in Luoyang and planned to lead an army towards Ye with Emperor Hui. He summoned Ji Shao and reinstated him as Palace Attendant for the last time. Believing that the emperor was in trouble, Ji Shao rushed to his temporary palace upon receiving the edict. Before setting out, another Palace Attendant, Qin Zhun (秦準), warned him, "Now that you are departing, safety and danger will be difficult to ascertain. Have you got a good horse?" Ji Shao replied, "I will be guarding the imperial carriage, whether I live or die with it. What use would a good horse be?"[14]
On 9 September 304, while Sima Yue's army was passing through Dangyin (蕩陰; in present-day Anyang, Henan) they were attacked by Sima Ying's general, Shi Chao and suffered a great defeat. Emperor Hui was injured in the face and hit by three arrows as all his officials and guards fled. Only Ji Shao remained behind, and still wearing his court dress, he dismounted his horse and entered the imperial carriage to shield the emperor. Sima Ying's soldiers eventually dragged him out and pressed him against a broken shaft of the carriage to impale him. Despite Emperor Hui's pleas, the soldiers killed Ji Shao and his blood splashed on the emperor's clothes.[15]
Emperor Hui greatly mourned Ji Shao's death. After the battle, his servants wanted to wash his clothes, but Hui refused, saying, "This the blood of Palace Attendant Ji. Do not wash it off!"[16]
Evaluation
[edit]Posthumous honours
[edit]Later, Sima Yong had Emperor Hui forcibly relocated to his base at Chang'an in the end of 304. Though they were enemies, Sima Yong respected Ji Shao's loyalty and later submitted a petition to posthumously appoint him as Minister of Works and Duke of Yiyang. However, at the time, war broke out between with him and Sima Yue, who wanted to bring Emperor Hui back to Luoyang, so his proposal was never carried out.[17]
In 306, when Sima Yue was stationed around the Xu region, he passed through Ji Shao's tomb at Xingyang. Yue wept, carved a stone tablet and erected a monument for Ji Shao. The prince also submitted a petition to confer official titles to him. In response, the later Emperor Huai of Jin posthumously appointed him as Palace Attendant and Household Counsellor with Golden Tassel, granted him a golden seal and purple tassel and promoted his peerage to Marquis of Yiyang. In addition, he was granted more land for his tomb with ten guest households and sacrifices through the Shaolao (少牢) rites.[18]
The Prince of Langya, Sima Rui, who held command over the Jiangnan region, felt that Ji Shao's merits had not been sufficiently rewarded. After he was appointed Left Imperial Chancellor in 312, he awarded Ji Shao with the office of Grand Commandant and offered sacrifice with the Tailao (太牢) rites. When Sima Rui ascended the throne at Jiankang in 318, Ji Shao was given the posthumous name of "Zhongmu" (忠穆).[19]
The Book of Jin, compiled by Fang Xuanling during the Tang dynasty, ranked Ji Shao as first in the entry titled "Loyalty and Righteousness".[20] The expression of "Palace Attendant Ji's blood" (嵇侍中血), meaning loyalty, was invoked by the Tang poets, Du Fu[21] and Han Wo,[22] and then the Song dynasty general, Wen Tianxiang in his poem "The Song of Righteousness" (正氣歌).[23] Ji Shao is also the origin of the Chinese phrase "A crane standing among chickens" (鹤立鸡群), which was used to describe him and now means to stand out among others.[24]
Criticism
[edit]However, Ji Shao also had critics who believed that he had violated the Confucian principle of filial piety by serving the same family that falsely accused and killed his father. The scholar, Guo Xiang who lived during the same time as Ji Shao, thought that he was unfilial and that his sacrifice for a tyrant was only to satiate his own greed for power.[25]
Xi Jian, another contemporary scholar and high-ranking minister of the Eastern Jin dynasty, had a discussion with his peer, Wang Yin on who was better between Ji Shao and Wang Pou. Similar to Ji Shao, Wang Pou's father, Wang Yi (王儀), was wrongfully accused and executed by Sima Zhao for his defeat at the Battle of Dongxing. However, Wang Pou became determined to never serve the Sima clan and did so up to his death. Xi Jian insisted that Wang Pou was better than Ji Shao for his filial piety. Alluding to Yu the Great, he further states that Ji Shao's situation was incomparable, as Yu's father, Gun had actually committed a crime that warranted a punishment from their ruler, Shun, unlike Ji Kang.[26]
Song dynasty scholars, Sima Guang[27] and Zhu Xi[28] both commended Ji Shao for his deeds at Dangyin, but maintained that his service to the Jin was unfilial. During the late Ming and early Qing dynasties, Ji Shao was severely criticized by Wang Fuzhi[29] and Gu Yanwu,[30] both believing that, in any case, Ji Shao's loyalty should have lied with the Cao Wei dynasty, which his father had served, and that Dangyin did not absolve him from being unfilial.
References
[edit]- ^ Vol.85 of Zizhi Tongjian recorded that the battle of Dangyin took place on the jiwei day of the 7th month of the 1st year of the Yongxing era, which corresponds to 9 Sep 304 in the Julian calendar.
- ^ (嵇紹，字延祖，魏中散大夫康之子也。十歲而孤，事母孝謹。以父得罪，靖居私門。山濤領選，啟武帝曰：「《康誥》有言：'父子罪不相及。'嵇紹賢侔郤缺，宜加旌命，請為秘書郎。」帝謂濤曰：「如卿所言，乃堪為丞，何但郎也。」乃發詔征之，起家為秘書丞。) Jin Shu, vol.89
- ^ (累遷汝陰太守...轉豫章內史，以母憂，不之官。服闋，拜徐州刺史。時石崇為都督，性雖驕暴，而紹將之以道，崇甚親敬之。後以長子喪去職。) Jin Shu, vol.89
- ^ (元康初，為給事黃門侍郎。時侍中賈謐以外戚之寵，年少居位，潘岳、杜斌等皆附托焉。謐求交於紹，紹距而不答。及謐誅，紹時在省，以不阿比凶族，封弋陽子，遷散騎常侍，領國子博士。) Jin Shu, vol.89
- ^ (趙王倫篡位，署為侍中。惠帝復阼，遂居其職。) Jin Shu, vol.89
- ^ (倫將篡位，義陽王威執詔示嵇紹曰：「聖上法堯、舜之舉，卿其然乎？」紹厲聲曰：「有死而已，終不有二！」威怒，拔劍而出。及惠帝遷于金墉城，唯紹固志不從，直于金墉，絕不通倫，時人皆爲之懼。) Sanshiguo Chunqiu
- ^ (司空張華為倫所誅，議者追理其事，欲復其爵，紹又駁曰：「臣之事君，當除煩去惑。華歷位內外，雖粗有善事，然闔棺之責，著於遠近，兆禍始亂，華實為之。故鄭討幽公之亂，斫子家之棺；魯戮隱罪，終篇貶翬。未忍重戮，事已弘矣，謂不宜復其爵位，理其無罪。」時帝初反正，紹又上疏曰：「臣聞改前轍者則車不傾，革往弊者則政不爽。太一統于元首，百司役於多士，故周文興于上，成康穆於下也。存不忘亡，《易》之善義；願陛下無忘金墉，大司馬無忘潁上，大將軍無忘黃橋，則禍亂之萌無由而兆矣。」) Jin Shu, vol.89
- ^ (齊王冏為大司馬，初，嵇紹為冏所重，每下階迎之。) Jin Shu, vol.61
- ^ (齊王冏既輔政，大興第舍，驕奢滋甚，紹以書諫曰：「夏禹以卑室稱美，唐虞以茅茨顯德，豐屋蔀家，無益危亡。竊承毀敗太樂以廣第舍，興造功力為三王立宅，此豈今日之先急哉！今大事始定，萬姓顒，咸待覆潤，宜省起造之煩，深思謙損之理。復主之勳不可棄矣，矢石之殆不可忘也。」冏雖謙順以報之，而卒不能用。) Jin Shu, vol.89
- ^ (紹嘗詣炯諮事，遇炯宴會，召董艾、葛旗等共論時政。艾言於炯曰：「嵇侍中善於絲竹，公可令操之。」左右進琴，紹推不受。冏曰：「今日為歡，卿何吝此邪！」紹對曰：「公匡復社稷，當軌物作則，垂之於後。紹雖虛鄙，忝備常伯，腰紱冠冕，鳴玉殿省，豈可操執絲竹，以為伶人之事！若釋公服從私宴，所不敢辭也。」冏大慚。艾等不自得而退。) Jin Shu, vol.89
- ^ (頃之，以公事免，冏以為左司馬。旬日，冏被誅。初，兵交，紹奔散赴宮，有持弩在東閣下者，將射之，遇有殿中將兵蕭隆，見紹姿容長者，疑非凡人，趣前拔箭，於此得免。遂還滎陽舊宅。) Jin Shu, vol.61
- ^ (尋徵為御史中丞，未拜，復為侍中。河間王顒、成都王穎舉兵向京都，以討長沙王乂，大駕次於城東。乂言於眾曰：「今日西討，欲誰為都督乎？」六軍之士皆曰：「願嵇侍中戮力前驅，死猶生也。」遂拜紹使持節、平西將軍。) Jin Shu, vol.89
- ^ (屬乂被執，紹復為侍中。公王以下皆詣鄴謝罪於穎，紹等咸見廢黜，免為庶人。) Jin Shu, vol.89
- ^ (徵前侍中嵇紹詣行在。侍中秦準謂紹曰：「今往，安危難測，卿有佳馬乎？」紹正色曰：「臣子扈衞乘輿，死生以之，佳馬何爲！」) Zizhi Tongjian, vol.85
- ^ (陳眕二弟匡、規自鄴赴行在，云鄴中皆已離散，由是不甚設備。[永兴元年七月]己未，石超軍奄至，乘輿敗績於蕩陰，帝傷頰，中三矢，百官侍御皆散。嵇紹朝服，下馬登輦，以身衞帝，兵人引紹於轅中斫之。帝曰：「忠臣也，勿殺！」對曰：「奉太弟令，惟不犯陛下一人耳。」遂殺紹，血濺帝衣。) Zizhi Tongjian, vol.85
- ^ (左右欲浣帝衣，帝曰：「嵇侍中血，勿浣也！」) Zizhi Tongjian, vol.85
- ^ (及張方逼帝遷長安，河間王顒表贈紹司空，進爵為公。會帝還洛陽，事遂未行。) Jin Shu, vol.89
- ^ (東海王越屯許，路經滎陽，過紹墓，哭之悲慟，刊石立碑，又表贈官爵。帝乃遣使冊贈侍中、光祿大夫，加金章紫綬，進爵為侯，賜墓田一頃，客十戶，祠以少牢。) Jin Shu, vol.89
- ^ (元帝為左丞相，承制，以紹死節事重，而贈禮未副勳德，更表贈太尉，祠乙太牢。及帝即位，賜諡曰忠穆，復加太牢之祠。) Jin Shu, vol.89
- ^ Jin Shu, vol.89
- ^ "全唐詩/卷228 - 维基文库，自由的图书馆". zh.wikisource.org (in Chinese). Retrieved 2025-05-21.
- ^ "感事三十四韻 - 维基文库，自由的图书馆". zh.wikisource.org (in Chinese). Retrieved 2025-05-21.
- ^ "正氣歌 - 维基文库，自由的图书馆". zh.wikisource.org (in Chinese). Retrieved 2025-05-21.
- ^ (紹始入洛，或謂王戎曰：「昨于稠人中始見嵇紹，昂昂然如野鶴之在雞群。」戎曰：「君復未見其父耳。」) Jin Shu, vol.89
- ^ (王隱《晋書》曰：河南郭象著文，稱嵇紹父死在非罪，曾無耿介，貪位死暗主，義不足多。) Taiping Yulan, vol.445, citing the Jin Shu by Wang Yin
- ^ (曾以問郤公曰：「王褒之父亦非罪死？褒猶辭徵，紹不辭，用誰爲多少？」郤公曰：「王勝于嵇。」或曰：「魏晋所殺子皆仕宦，何以無非也？」答曰：「殛鯀興禹，禹不辭興者，以鯀犯罪也。若以時君所殺爲當耶，則同于禹；以不當耶，則同于嵇。」) Taiping Yulan, vol.445
- ^ (臣光曰：昔舜誅鯀而禹事舜，不敢廢至公也。嵇康、王儀，死皆不以其罪，二子不仕晉室可也；嵇紹苟無蕩陰之忠，〈蕩陰事見後八十五卷惠帝永興元年。余謂蕩陰之難，君子以嵇紹爲忠於所事可也，然未足以塞天性之傷也。蕩，音湯。〉殆不免於君子之譏乎！) Sima Guang's commentary in Zizhi Tongjian, vol.80, along with Hu Sanxing's annotation for the paragraph.
- ^ (王儀為司馬昭軍師，昭殺之雖無辜，裒仕晉猶有可說。而裒不仕，乃過於厚者。嵇康魏臣，而晉殺之，紹不當仕晉明矣。蕩陰之忠固可取，亦不相贖。事讎之過，自不相掩。) Zhuzi Yulei, vol.136
- ^ (嵇紹可以仕晉乎？曰：不可。仕晉而可為之死乎？曰：仕而惡可弗死也！仕則必死之，故必不可仕也。父受誅，子讎焉，非法也；父不受誅，子不讎焉，非心也。此猶為一王之下，君臣分定，天子制法，有司奉行，而有受誅不受誅者言也。嵇康之在魏，與司馬昭俱比肩而事主，康非昭之所得殺而殺之，亦平人之相賊殺而已。且康之死也，以非湯、武而見憚於昭，是晉之終篡，康且遺恨於泉下，而紹戴之以為君，然則昭其湯、武而康其飛廉、惡來矣乎！紹於是不孝之罪通於天矣。) Du Tongjian Lun, vol.11
- ^ (夫紹之於晉，非其君也，忘其父而事其非君，當其未死，三十餘年之間，為無父之人亦已久矣，而蕩陰之死，何足以贖其罪乎！且其入仕之初，豈知必有乘輿敗績之事，而可樹其忠名以蓋於晚也。自正始以來，而大義之不明遍於天下。如山濤者，既為邪說之魁，遂使嵇紹之賢且犯天下之不韙而不顧。夫邪正之說不容兩立，使謂紹為忠，則必謂王裒為不忠而後可也，何怪其相率臣於劉聰、石勒，觀其故主青衣行酒，而不以動其心者乎？) Rizhilu, vol.17
- Fang, Xuanling (ed.) (648). Book of Jin (Jin Shu).
- Sima, Guang (1084). Zizhi Tongjian.