Jump to content

Manosphere

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The manosphere is a loose group of blogs and forums reportedly promoting misogyny, masculinity and antifeminism.[1]

Overview

[change | change source]

Groups related to the manosphere include men's rights activists (MRA), Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW), and pick-up artists (PUA). Support for these ideas is referred to as "taking the red pill", a metaphor derived from the 1999 film The Matrix.[1] Those being considered part of the manosphere are often accused of "violent sexism" on the basis of having a "sense of entitlement to sex".[1]

However, some research found that their purported "violent sexism" was exaggerated by women over different reasons.[2] Some women also made false accusations of rape over interpersonal conflict to take revenge on others,[3] though the rate of occurrence is low.[3]

Steve McCullough of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights claimed that these social factors correlated with the rise of the manosphere:[4]

  • High rates of loneliness, depression and suicide among men
  • Drop in traditionally "manly" jobs from changes in global economy
  • Gains in gender equality that came with changes in traditional gender roles

In McCullough's view, the manosphere "blames them all on women".[4] McCullough also cited historian Michael Kimmel's theories to claim that manosphere's participants are motivated by "aggrieved entitlement",[4][5] where "people with power and privilege see improvements in equality and inclusiveness as a loss of status and thus a personal attack on themselves",[4][5] referring to men "still enjoying unequal power and privilege around the world".[4][5] However, he did not elaborate his claim in detail.[4]

Reception

[change | change source]

Groups associated with the incel or MGTOW movement are often criticized by the leftists due to their disagreement with these groups' opposition to certain progressive values.[1][6] However, many believe that those criticizing the incel or MGTOW movement ignore the cause and effect of their existence.[6] Some critics see those criticism as "alarmist, inaccurate, and misrepresenting" the problem.[6] Mass media have also been criticized for their coverage of these groups,[6] some of which directly compare the problem to Islamic terrorism regardless of context.[6]

In January 2023, The Times claimed that half of the persons referred to the Prevent,[6][7] a British counter-extremism programme, were incels in the year ending March 2021.[6][7] However, critics pointed out that there was no evidence to support such a claim.[6]

Government

[change | change source]

United Kingdom

[change | change source]

The public data from the UK Home Office showed that only 22~25% of those referred to the Prevent were classified as having "mixed, unstable or unclear ideology" (MUU) – a category for anything other than right-wing or Islamist extremism.[6][8] Among the small percentage of the referred, a small number of them were seen as potential terrorists,[6] with some referrals dropped by specialists as they did not know the definition of incel.[6]

Academia

[change | change source]

Some scholars emphasized that most incels were lonely, depressed young men,[6][9] many of whom were neurodivergent,[6][9] of diverse ages, religions, ethnicities and sexual orientations.[6][9] The social stigma is said to be refutable but repeatedly promoted by self-declared experts against the "lonely, depressed young men".[6] The self-declared experts were also criticized for misusing dubious statistics (e.g. cherry-picking) to support their bias.[6][10]

References

[change | change source]
  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3
    • Rauch, Allison (January 13, 2025). "red pill and blue pill". Britannica. Retrieved March 4, 2025.
    • Friedland, Roger (2018). "Donald's Dick: A Man Against the Institutions". In Mast, Jason L.; Alexander, Jeffrey C. (eds.). Politics of Meaning/Meaning of Politics: Cultural Sociology of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 115–133. doi:10.1111/soin.12328. ISBN 978-3-319-95944-3. S2CID 210440082.
    • Ging, Debbie (2019). "Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere". Men and Masculinities. 22 (4): 638–657. doi:10.1177/1097184x17706401. ISSN 1097-184X. S2CID 149239953.
    • Goldwag, Arthur (March 1, 2012a). "Leader's Suicide Brings Attention to Men's Rights Movement". Intelligence Report (Spring 2012). Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).
    • Goldwag, Arthur (May 15, 2012b). "Intelligence Report Article Provokes Fury Among Men's Rights Activists". Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Retrieved February 9, 2020.
    • Hodapp, Christa (2017). Men's Rights, Gender, and Social Media. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. ISBN 978-1-49-852617-3.
  2. Waddell, Nina; Overall, Nickola C. (August 11, 2022). "Bias, accuracy and assumed similarity in judging intimate partners' sexist attitudes". Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 40 (2). doi:10.1177/02654075221118546. Retrieved April 14, 2025.
  3. 3.0 3.1
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 "Online misogyny: the "manosphere"". Canadian Museum for Human Rights. September 12, 2023. Retrieved May 8, 2025.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Michael Kimmel. Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era. New York: Nation Books, 2013.
  6. 6.00 6.01 6.02 6.03 6.04 6.05 6.06 6.07 6.08 6.09 6.10 6.11 6.12 6.13 6.14 6.15 Kates, Naama (January 23, 2023). "The moral panic over incels". Spiked. Retrieved March 4, 2025.
  7. 7.0 7.1 "Prevent anti-extremist scheme must tackle incels, MP warns". The Times. January 20, 2023. Retrieved March 4, 2025.
  8. "Individuals referred to and supported through the Prevent Programme, England and Wales, April 2020 to March 2021". UK Home Office. November 18, 2021. Retrieved March 4, 2025.
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 Costello, William; Arevalo, Vania Rolon; Thomas, Andrew G; Schmitt, David (2022). "Levels of well-being among men who are incels (involuntary celibates)". ResearchGate. doi:10.31219/osf.io/tnf7b. Retrieved March 4, 2025.
  10. Signal, Jesse (September 26, 2022). "That New Report On Incels Is A Cherry-picked, Misleading Mess". Signal-Minded. Retrieved March 4, 2025.