User contributions for ExplodingCabbage
Appearance
A user with 830 edits. Account created on 3 October 2011.
28 May 2025
- 09:0009:00, 28 May 2025 diff hist +350 User talk:120.20.80.145 →Your draft: Reply Tag: Reply
- 08:5608:56, 28 May 2025 diff hist +482 User talk:120.20.80.145 →May 2025: Reply Tag: Reply
- 08:5308:53, 28 May 2025 diff hist −6,937 Cerebral organoid Undid revision 1292638604 by 120.20.80.145 (talk) - vandalism? Edit inserted what is clearly a massive copy and paste from another source at the beginning of the article, before the intro. Motive unclear to me. current Tag: Undo
26 May 2025
- 09:4809:48, 26 May 2025 diff hist +872 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →The broader picture - advocacy sources: Reply Tag: Reply
25 May 2025
- 09:0409:04, 25 May 2025 diff hist +656 Talk:Evil eye →Nazar amulet circular links: Reply Tag: Reply
- 09:0309:03, 25 May 2025 diff hist +2,583 Talk:Evil eye →Article has lots of stylistic issues and IMO is generally badly written: new section Tag: New topic
20 May 2025
- 20:4620:46, 20 May 2025 diff hist +1,119 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Definist fallacy →Definist fallacy: Reply Tag: Reply
- 08:1008:10, 20 May 2025 diff hist +1 m Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Definist fallacy add bullet point to my previous comment
19 May 2025
- 08:4708:47, 19 May 2025 diff hist +739 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Definist fallacy →Definist fallacy: Reply Tag: Reply
16 May 2025
- 10:0910:09, 16 May 2025 diff hist −36 List of towns and villages in Kiribati Undid revision 1281454810 by 14.195.131.227 (talk) - I can't find any mention of a "New Delhi" in Kiritimati on Google, and no source was ever given for its inclusion current Tag: Undo
14 May 2025
- 08:5508:55, 14 May 2025 diff hist −1,244 Talk:Naturalistic fallacy Remove some ravings from someone "in a dark place". I hope he or she is doing well. current
- 08:5008:50, 14 May 2025 diff hist +304 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Definist fallacy →Definist fallacy: Reply Tags: Disambiguation links added Reply
- 08:3808:38, 14 May 2025 diff hist −4 Fred Turner (entrepreneur) Revert one small part of User:Chopcha's recent copyedit. Per Curative (company), the company has three "founders" (Fred, Isaac, and Vlad), so we probably shouldn't call Fred "the" founder here. (COI disclosure again: past working relationship with all three of these chaps and with Curative.) current
- 08:3308:33, 14 May 2025 diff hist +820 Talk:IHRA definition of antisemitism →"non-legally binding": Reply Tag: Reply
13 May 2025
- 11:5011:50, 13 May 2025 diff hist −12 Talk:Kemi Badenoch remove a typo from my old comment - somehow I pasted an entire word in the middle of a quote where it didn't belong, I guess current
- 10:5110:51, 13 May 2025 diff hist −968 IHRA definition of antisemitism Re-remove para about France and Ireland. The sentence about France did little more than repeated what's already in the table above, but got the date wrong and was confusingly unclear about whether this amounted to France actually adopting the defn (it did). The stuff about Ireland was out of date (said it has not adopted the defn, but in fact it now has). I think ping:Lewisguile undid this deletion by mistake when rolling back my other, more contentious edits.
- 10:4110:41, 13 May 2025 diff hist +5,404 Talk:IHRA definition of antisemitism →"non-legally binding": Reply Tag: Reply
12 May 2025
- 19:1619:16, 12 May 2025 diff hist +515 Talk:Free trade agreements of the United Kingdom →Proposed UK-US "EPD" not an FTA?: Reply current Tag: Reply
- 18:3018:30, 12 May 2025 diff hist −139 Free trade agreements of the United Kingdom Tweak wording of comment about EPD
- 18:2718:27, 12 May 2025 diff hist +918 Talk:Free trade agreements of the United Kingdom →Proposed UK-US "EPD" not an FTA?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:3116:31, 12 May 2025 diff hist +551 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy →Definist fallacy deletion discussion: new section Tag: New topic
- 16:2716:27, 12 May 2025 diff hist +522 User talk:FatalSubjectivities →Delete Definist fallacy?: new section current Tag: New topic
- 16:2216:22, 12 May 2025 diff hist +53 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 12 Not sure why this didn't work last time. Trying to list Definist fallacy again. Sorry if I am again getting something wrong.
- 16:2116:21, 12 May 2025 diff hist +5 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 12 Undid revision 1290066745 by ExplodingCabbage (talk) Tag: Undo
- 16:2016:20, 12 May 2025 diff hist −5 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 12 list Definist Fallacy Tag: Reverted
- 16:1716:17, 12 May 2025 diff hist +735 Definist fallacy proposing deletion current
- 16:1216:12, 12 May 2025 diff hist +1,748 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Definist fallacy →Definist fallacy: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:0516:05, 12 May 2025 diff hist +713 N Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Definist fallacy Propose deletion of Definist fallacy
- 15:1415:14, 12 May 2025 diff hist +535 Talk:Definist fallacy →Hopeless article right now - doesn't even define the fallacy: new section current Tag: New topic
- 15:0215:02, 12 May 2025 diff hist +3 Talk:Persuasive definition No edit summary current
- 15:0215:02, 12 May 2025 diff hist +628 Talk:Persuasive definition →Political examples: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:2014:20, 12 May 2025 diff hist −968 IHRA definition of antisemitism Remove erroneous & redundant sentence about France (it was 3rd Dec, not 5th Dec, and we already note it in the adoption table above) & also remove outdated information about Ireland (which is an adopter as of 2025) Tag: Reverted
- 14:1714:17, 12 May 2025 diff hist +80 IHRA definition of antisemitism Put "Non-member" in status column for states with no IHRA affiliation; previously it looked like we were missing data Tag: Reverted
- 14:0814:08, 12 May 2025 diff hist +444 Talk:IHRA definition of antisemitism →"non-legally binding": Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:0514:05, 12 May 2025 diff hist +394 IHRA definition of antisemitism Work some explanation of "non-legally binding" into the lead while tightening up prose elsewhere in the lead to preserve its overall length Tag: Reverted
- 13:3213:32, 12 May 2025 diff hist +419 Talk:IHRA definition of antisemitism →"non-legally binding": Reply Tag: Reply
- 09:1509:15, 12 May 2025 diff hist +734 Talk:Leighton–Linslade →Merge with Leighton Buzzard?: Reply current Tag: Reply
- 08:5508:55, 12 May 2025 diff hist +268 Talk:Free trade agreements of the United Kingdom →Proposed UK-US "EPD" not an FTA?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 08:5208:52, 12 May 2025 diff hist −2 m Free trade agreements of the United Kingdom typo fix to my prev edit Tag: Reverted
- 08:5208:52, 12 May 2025 diff hist +1,411 Free trade agreements of the United Kingdom Mention EPD per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Free_trade_agreements_of_the_United_Kingdom#Proposed_UK-US_%22EPD%22_not_an_FTA? Tag: Reverted
11 May 2025
- 22:3422:34, 11 May 2025 diff hist +527 Talk:Free trade agreements of the United Kingdom →Proposed UK-US "EPD" not an FTA?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:4820:48, 11 May 2025 diff hist +88 Talk:IHRA definition of antisemitism No edit summary
- 20:4620:46, 11 May 2025 diff hist +892 Talk:IHRA definition of antisemitism →"non-legally binding": Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:0620:06, 11 May 2025 diff hist −1 Michael Burrows (computer scientist) Errr, REALLY fix maintenance error current
- 20:0620:06, 11 May 2025 diff hist −7 Michael Burrows (computer scientist) Fix maintenance error
- 20:0120:01, 11 May 2025 diff hist +164 Michael Burrows (computer scientist) Add missing citation for Mike's DOB
- 18:4718:47, 11 May 2025 diff hist +5 Talk:Free trade agreements of the United Kingdom another typo fix, sorry
- 18:4718:47, 11 May 2025 diff hist +13 Talk:Free trade agreements of the United Kingdom nitpick prev comment - i mean they're only allowed to agree to PREFERENTIAL tariff reductions via an FTA, obviously. Obviously they can decrease universally.
- 18:4518:45, 11 May 2025 diff hist +711 Talk:Free trade agreements of the United Kingdom →Proposed UK-US "EPD" not an FTA?: new section Tag: New topic
10 May 2025
- 20:3420:34, 10 May 2025 diff hist +1,063 Free trade agreements of the United Kingdom Undid revision 1289623838 by StevoLaker (talk) - how can a published commitment in principle by both sides to an agreement that includes preferential tariff reductions (and will therefore constitute an FTA) *possibly* constitute as "no indication of FTA talks"? Tags: Undo Reverted