User talk:Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:08, 3 May 2025

Welcome!

Hello, Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:38, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kurti

Please note that disambiguation pages like Kurti are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 13:59, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Medveđa, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanjagenije I will cite my sources then you add what I said back please https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/short_news/un-to-address-presevo-valley-administrative-cleansing/

https://albanianpost.com/en/serbia-is-depopulating-albanians-in-the-presevo-valley/

https://www.google.com/search?q=ethnic+cleansing+of+albanians+in+presevo+valley&oq=ethnic+cleansin&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqBggBECMYJzIGCAAQRRg5MgYIARAjGCcyEAgCEAAYkQIYsQMYgAQYigUyDQgDEAAYgwEYsQMYgAQyDAgEEAAYFBiHAhiABDIHCAUQLhiABDIHCAYQABiABDIHCAcQABiABDIHCAgQABiABDIHCAkQABiABDIHCAoQABiABDIHCAsQABiABDIHCAwQABiABDIHCA0QABiABDIHCA4QABiABNIBCDIzOTFqMGo5qAIAsAIA&client=ms-android-samsung-ss&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8&chrome_dse_attribution=1#ip=1 Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti (talk) 20:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sylejman (Idriz) Sylejmani

Hello, Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sylejman (Idriz) Sylejmani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

how do I upload the draft? Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti (talk) 22:34, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@FireflyBot I have completed my editing of the draft please answer me how may i publish the draft and make it public? Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti (talk) 20:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced stubs

Please do not create so many unsourced articles at once. You should create just a few, and then wait for someone to review them, before proceeding to create more. Also, you should consider improving these articles in draftspace, where you can take all the time you need without the risk of someone deleting them. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shaban Zenuni moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Shaban Zenuni. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jetullah Qarri moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jetullah Qarri. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bajram Mazrekaj moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bajram Mazrekaj. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fisnik Meti moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Fisnik Meti. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:41, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hisen Berisha

Hello Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hisen Berisha for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 04:58, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aviram7 are you mentally stable? what are you talking about Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti (talk) 18:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz I didn't do that Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti (talk) 18:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shefket Musliu moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Shefket Musliu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Përmet Vula moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Përmet Vula. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CycloneYoris no put it back Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti (talk) 18:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti. Thank you for your work on Sylejman Sylejmani. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

IMO an edge case regarding wp:notability but I'm marking as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shaban Zenuni

Hello, Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shaban Zenuni, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jetullah Qarri

Hello, Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jetullah Qarri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bajram Mazrekaj

Hello, Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bajram Mazrekaj, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fisnik Meti

Hello, Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fisnik Meti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Përmet Vula

Hello, Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Përmet Vula, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shaban Zenuni

Hello, Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Shaban Zenuni".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jetullah Qarri

Hello, Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jetullah Qarri".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bajram Mazrekaj

Hello, Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bajram Mazrekaj".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:15, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fisnik Meti

Hello, Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Fisnik Meti".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shefket Musliu 1

Hello, Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shefket Musliu 1, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

C F A 💬 02:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bedri Shala for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bedri Shala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bedri Shala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shefket Musliu 1

Hello, Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Shefket Musliu 1".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

Your additions in this edit here, have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.)

To see the possible source of the copyrighted text, look in the edit summary which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. There should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation, set off using the blockquote template. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. ~~~~ S Philbrick (Talk) 19:50, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the Kosovo War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mitrovica. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Qaufe pash

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Slatersteven (talk) 11:59, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Slatersteven I've been adding that the "Battle of Qafe prush" wasn't a battle but an ambush as every source cited on the battles page describe it as an ambush and not a single one titles it as a battle however the User is still stubbornly claiming that it was a battle with no justification. Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti (talk) 12:04, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

being right is not a justification. Slatersteven (talk) 12:26, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Serbian traditional clothing, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. — Sadko (words are wind) 17:15, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Battle of Lodja, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theonewithreason (talk) 12:09, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Also, if you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced as you did on several pages, you may be blocked from editing. Theonewithreason (talk) 17:06, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Theonewithreason w&÷, did I do that and with what pages? Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti (talk) 21:50, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Theonewithreason You are completely lying everything I wrote is mentioned in those sources and they're all valid international sources stop trying to push Serbian propaganda. Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti (talk) 21:52, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please be mindful of how you communicate with other editors. This is a friendly but serious warning. — Sadko (words are wind) 10:01, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sadko my edits are being wrongfully reverted based on lies by serbs like you. Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti (talk) 12:42, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what kind of 'doctor' you claim to be, but maybe start with basic manners before setting out to rewrite history on Wikipedia from ancient times to today. Best. — Sadko (words are wind) 21:36, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sadko I am a doctor of Political science but thats irrelevant. I made these edits and they are backed by several credible sources but they have been wrongfully reverted I recommend you look at them and double check before reverting. Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti (talk) 23:25, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bajgora offensive

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Bajgora offensive, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:50, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti. Thank you. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:08, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 298: / Line 298: @@
 If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:Bajgora offensive|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. <!-- Template:Db-hoax-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 22:50, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
+== Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion ==
+Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement]] regarding a possible violation of an [[WP:AC|Arbitration Committee]] decision. The thread is '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti|Dr Dijon Ethem Kurti]]'''.  <!--Template:AE-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 23:08, 3 May 2025 (UTC)