Jump to content

User talk:Tenshi Hinanawi: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Properly deflated: @Chriskingstl "By level 1 headings I mean the section h..." [Factotum]
Notification: Your contested technical move request(s) has been removed from Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests.
Tag: Reverted
Line 221: Line 221:
::Thank you. "Properly deflated" is the error message Wikipedia sent me - I have no idea what it means. I do add all links individually. I will try to figure out what you mean by "level I headings." [[User:Chriskingstl|Chriskingstl]] ([[User talk:Chriskingstl|talk]]) 21:23, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
::Thank you. "Properly deflated" is the error message Wikipedia sent me - I have no idea what it means. I do add all links individually. I will try to figure out what you mean by "level I headings." [[User:Chriskingstl|Chriskingstl]] ([[User talk:Chriskingstl|talk]]) 21:23, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
:::By level 1 headings I mean the section headings, such as the one for this section titled "Properly deflated".<span id="Tenshi_Hinanawi:1749072280058:User_talkFTTCLNTenshi_Hinanawi" class="FTTCmt"> —&nbsp;[[User: Tenshi Hinanawi|Tenshi!]] ([[User talk: Tenshi Hinanawi|Talk page]]) 21:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)</span>
:::By level 1 headings I mean the section headings, such as the one for this section titled "Properly deflated".<span id="Tenshi_Hinanawi:1749072280058:User_talkFTTCLNTenshi_Hinanawi" class="FTTCmt"> —&nbsp;[[User: Tenshi Hinanawi|Tenshi!]] ([[User talk: Tenshi Hinanawi|Talk page]]) 21:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)</span>
== Your technical move request ==
[[File:Merge-split-transwiki_default.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]]

Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, your {{#if:|[[Special:Permalink/{{#if:||1294087518}}#{{#invoke:String|sub|{{#invoke:BaseConvert|16to36|{{#invoke:Hash function|main|adler32|{{#invoke:string|replace|plain=false||%W|}}}}}}|-3}}|recent request]]|recent request}} at [[Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests]] has been removed because it remained inactive for seventy-two hours after being contested. If you would like to proceed with your original request, please follow the directions at [[Wikipedia:Requested moves/Controversial]].

This notification was delivered by [[User:TenshiBot|TenshiBot]]. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}TenshiBot}} on the top of your current page (your user talk page) [[User:TenshiBot|TenshiBot]] ([[User talk:TenshiBot|talk]]) 14:22, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:22, 5 June 2025

Welcome!

Hi TenshiSWR! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --Edcolins (talk) 18:23, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Edcolins. Tenshi! (Talk page) 12:17, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome! Note that you may want to change the link that is within brackets in your signature from "Talk:TenshiSWR" to "User talk:TenshiSWR". Perhaps this is the link you intended to include. Edcolins (talk) 14:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't notice that, thanks again. Tenshi! (Talk page) 14:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is a sockpuppet of Piermark. I would advise reporting to AIV or simply leaving him be. See also Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Piermark JayCubby 22:40, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:JayCubby, I wasn't aware of that at the time, and assumed good faith anyway. I'll remember this for the future, thanks. Tenshi! (Talk page) 22:44, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Piermark isn't the nastiest of the LTAs (in that he mostly posts weird screeds and is less likely than some to dox). Cheers. JayCubby 22:51, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your changes; the links I added are appropriate and link to the page for each chapter delineated within the wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HatzalahWiki (talkcontribs) 18:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HatzalahWiki: See WP:SPAM#External link spamming and MOS:LINKS. Links should not be in the article body. Tenshi! (Talk page) 19:03, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I understand - in this case, the external links are neither spam nor promotional. At some point, I can add them to a reference block, or if you're up for the challenge, please feel free to tackle before me! HatzalahWiki (talk) 19:04, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Kindly do not revert. I made many (many) more changes beyond the links. When you revert, you're undoing all of them. I will be happy to address the links as noted below or, f you have bandwidth, please feel free, however please do not revert again. Thank you! HatzalahWiki (talk) 19:15, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Links addressed; thank you. HatzalahWiki (talk) 19:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Barkeep49 (talk) 20:20, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy deletion: Draft:Jenny Browne

Hi there, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I wanted to let you know I have declined your G12 speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jenny Browne because the copyrighted information can be pruned from the article. Please let me know if you have any follow-up questions, comments, and/or concerns regarding this matter. Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 February 2025

The Signpost: 27 February 2025

Pilot (Modern Family) changes

Hi Tenshi,

I am responding to your message about the change I made to the article Pilot (Modern Family). The changes I made to were to accurately reflect the existing source. The sentence as it was previously written misinterpreted the source article, Nelson didn't turn down the role because he was having money problems, but because he felt he was not being offered enough money. In short, I was not adding any newly sourced information, but more accurately reflecting what was in the existing source.

Thanks. 2001:BB6:2476:9B58:498:B882:631B:393A (talk) 19:40, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 2001:BB6:2476:9B58:498:B882:631B:393A, I see it in the source now, so I've self-reverted for you. Hope you have a good day! — Tenshi! (Talk page) 19:47, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, and the same to you! 2001:BB6:2476:9B58:498:B882:631B:393A (talk) 19:50, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Elli (talk | contribs) 17:17, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi there, at Nicola Perugini I was also thinking of requesting revision deletion, which is alright as you did it, but I didn’t know how to find the revision number. Please could you advise on that. Thanks, ScrabbleTiles (talk) 14:46, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I normally get it from the URL when you compare it between previous versions, for example the specific revision I requested revdel for would be Special:Diff/1280610580 (the numbers being what identifies the revision). — Tenshi! (Talk page) 14:52, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the help. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 14:54, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to also see Enterprisey's revdel script which is more easier than putting the revdel template on the article yourself. — Tenshi! (Talk page) 14:55, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I have done that. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 15:07, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Want to talk with you

Hello, i personally think you think i did something wrong, so do you know how to insert a table? Σ36 (talk) 13:17, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The table button in the normal editor can do this, for example:
Caption text
Header text Header text Header text
Example Example Example
Example Example Example
Example Example Example

Tenshi! (Talk page) 13:20, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 March 2025

A goat for you!

Thanks for your many positive contributions to Wikipedia!

GoldRomean (talk) 18:33, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks,GoldRomean. — Tenshi! (Talk page) 19:06, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help

Hi Tenshi

Thanks for the help, I was in the midst of editing with my phone when you came in with revisions to the "secret of secrets" page.

The text in question is from the authors webpage as a part of their ad campaign, I don't believe it falls under the copy right, but if you are certain of this, then the article shall remain without the plot for the time being 😁 Kane 1371 (talk) 17:52, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The edit you claim to be is copyright or plagiarism is false. I used the enough of the content to keep the story correct. I changed enough to keep it from being copyright or plagiarism. I studied both and have a degree in copyright law. You may be trying to protect the Hawaii sports team, that is great, however I at least too the effort to add content to the page where you did very little. It looks as if you are new to this, I have been at this since around 2010. MDSanker 19:26, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that the entirety of your edit was a copyright violation, however it was in part, hence the infringing material was removed. If you think otherwise, you could ask Rsjaffe, to undo their revdel so that you can restore the removed content. — Tenshi! (Talk page) 19:42, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
When you use “however” to introduce a new sentence, it still needs to be followed by a comma, just like any other introductory phrase. It's incorrect to miss out the comma. MDSanker 20:20, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You did exactly the same thing in your first reply. 2802:8012:E6:7300:8000:59C3:F4AB:E021 (talk) 10:55, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also I am sure you believe you are correct, however, I don't think it is worth the effort of doing anything else. To me this is the end of the issue. Thank you for your edits. MDSanker 20:22, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 9 April 2025

Rollback granted

Hi Tenshi Hinanawi. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

  • Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
  • Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Aoidh (talk) 01:26, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tenshi Hinanawi and thank you for your interest in copyright cleanup. Note that webpages of the US Government are in the public donain, and it's okay to copy their content as long as proper attribution is given. JPL is now part of NASA, so the webpage https://climatesciences.jpl.nasa.gov/events/20190423/ is in the public domain. I have restored the content and provided the required attribution.--— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:21, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diannaa, could you point me to where US government works are in the public domain? It's still unclear to me after looking at JPL's about us/privacy policy/terms of use pages. — Tenshi! (Talk page) 13:27, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's a good question. Please see Wikipedia:Public domain#United States government works, which gives detailed information on US Govt websites and how to recognize them. JPL was originally an independent organization but is now owned by NASA, and is therefore a US Government agency. A lot of US Government websites have clearer ownership statements, such as https://www.army.mil/, which has a banner at the top statiing "An official website of the US Government" but many do not, so research is required in some instances to ensure they are not independent contractors whose content would be subject to copyright. --— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:38, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 May 2025

A barnstar for you!

The Technical Barnstar
Thanks for creating the RM/TR clerking bot, I wouldn't have had the time to make the bot work at the end of the day, so I greatly appreciate the time taken, Thanks :) Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (they/them) 13:48, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, fingers crossed that no more problems come up with it hopefully. — Tenshi! (Talk page) 14:50, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of few topics

You removed two lines in the topic October 20, which both were correct so I want to ask why you would remove them 195.175.38.54 (talk) 19:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I presume you mean this edit. As stated in the edit summary, WP:DOYCITE applies. — Tenshi! (Talk page) 19:48, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My bad, forensic science day is September 20 lol but I looked up the singer and it seems that her birthday is 20 october, I'll just have to add a source 195.175.38.54 (talk) 21:07, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 May 2025

Hey @Tenshi Hinanawi

You declined https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:B%C3%BCrokratiemonster but I am not following the argumentation here. Happy to fix anything, but there is no specific reason given, can you please elaborate what is wrong?

THanks in advance

C Climate+Tech AI Think-tank (talk) 22:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The reason given is that the draft was produced from an LLM. There are obvious tells, such as all the references either leading to the website's home page or 404'ing. This means that the information cannot be verified from sources and establish notability. — Tenshi! (Talk page) 22:16, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Tenshi Hinanawi, the links are indeed invalid, gonna fix that. Climate+Tech AI Think-tank (talk) 18:27, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Properly deflated

Hi Tenshi. I am writing an article on Carl Marsh after interviewing him for two articles and being surprised to see there was no Wikipedia page for him. Everything was going fine until today when I added the below information drawn from one of my articles and was surprised by an error message that it was not "properly deflated." I cut this from the page and made another minor edit and it saved without error. What is improper deflation and how do I fix it? Thanks, Chris


Marsh gave a detailed explanation of his orchestral motives and concepts to The Common Reader:

“Near Wild Heaven” — Marsh said his deconstruction of this song “is quite literal, using the exact sequence of melody, rhythm and tempo as in the original song.” The R.E.M. song has a rare lead vocal by Mills. Marsh said, “After a brief brass fanfare based on the original background voices of the breakdown section”— background vocals by frontman Michael Stipe and drummer Bill Berry, not by the usual harmony vocalist Mills—“the sections of the reconstruction exactly echo the original song’s construction, with only a middle-section departure which features the African djembe.” [21]

“Cuyahoga” — Marsh based his music on Stipe’s lyrics, which counterpoint Native life with the violence and pollution of settler culture, calling for a valiant renewal of healthier values. Marsh’s piece opens with a pastoral passage evocative of pre-contact Native life, with the double basses playing the first five notes from Mills’ bass line. “Slowly, the other string sections join, from lowest to highest pitches,” Marsh said. “Meanwhile, muted solo brass play fragments of melodies from the song (echoes of European invaders murmur on the horizon). An orchestra-wide climax ensues. Then, muted French horns telegraph trouble in the distance.” The tension of contact becomes “more and more intense,” Marsh said, “before the orchestra erupts into the battle scene. Then the opening bass line reappears solemnly in double basses and tympani.” Marsh quotes from the invaders’ national anthem in a line for solo woodwinds “that descends into dissonance,” he said. “After spooky violin harmonics (meant to suggest cogitation), more positive rebuilding winds itself out and finally climaxes with the entire orchestra playing the song’s main chorus theme.” [22]

“Pilgrimage” — “Pilgrimage,” Marsh said, is one of those murky early R.E.M. songs where “one can get the feeling of being suspended between stream of consciousness and deep metaphor, without any roadmap to connect the dots.” He mentioned one of the song’s more puzzling images: “‘a two headed cow’???” With the lyrics offering enigma rather than direction, Marsh created a soundscape of an expedition into exotic worlds. “I didn’t have any specific destinations in mind, just a feeling of moving through strangely wonderful exotic settings,” Marsh said. “After a brief, enigmatic intro where muted horns echo the original R.E.M. voices over tremolo strings, a rather aggressive rhythm begins. A solo violin, cello and vibes play the original song’s full verse melody, the score instruction being ‘gypsy-esque.’ When the chorus follows, muted trumpets broadcast the melody. During the next verse section, the entire string section plays a densely harmonized verse melody.” After a brief oboe solo, Marsh lifts a pounding bass drum and repeating bass line from the R.E.M. song. “As the tension increases, the verse melody reappears, this time a colorful mélange of woodwinds and xylophone, with strings and horns offering accompanying splashes of color,” Marsh wrote. “Suddenly, the entire orchestra plays the break rhythm of the original song for eight measures. Then the music crescendos further into a no-holds-barred final dance. Is this some exotic boisterous dance ritual that the expeditioner has stumbled upon? After gasping one small breath in the flutes and oboes, the piece concludes with the bass instruments pounding out a final triplet motif.” [I went back and added this citation and it still did not save]

“Everybody Hurts" — “This has a general feeling of the bittersweet struggle of the lyrics and the ever-present existential question of why the necessity of life with pain,” Marsh said. “At the beginning and at the very end, the entire string section plays my enigma-of-life chord, a sonorous stack of three simultaneous chords. Throughout my career, I have employed this chord in other orchestrations that explored similar settings.” [23]

“Try Not to Breathe” — Marsh reached back for his first classical instrument, the bassoon, for the first solo in this orchestration. “This reconstruction uses the original 6/8 rhythm of the original rhythm from start to finish, starting out very light with pizzicato strings and solo bassoon, and slowly adding instruments of the orchestra as the rhythm very slowly intensifies,” Marsh said. “I imagined this rhythm to be a ticking clock that was representing the eventual ending of a long life (‘I have seen things that you’ll never see’). Strings take the melody on the first chorus, woodwinds on the second verse, and then a modulation ensues, releasing the full rhythmic and melodic capabilities of the orchestra until the rhythm inevitably goes out with a bang.” [I went back and added this citation and it still did not save] Chriskingstl (talk) 18:44, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chriskingstl, I'm not sure what you mean by "properly deflated" but it might be possible that you've hit one of the links in the spam blacklist which may be why you were unable to save your edit. You might want to try individually adding the links and see if it only happens when adding a specific link to a source. Also, you may want to consider using level 1 headings (headings that are wrapped in ==) in Draft:Carl Marsh. — Tenshi! (Talk page) 19:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. "Properly deflated" is the error message Wikipedia sent me - I have no idea what it means. I do add all links individually. I will try to figure out what you mean by "level I headings." Chriskingstl (talk) 21:23, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
By level 1 headings I mean the section headings, such as the one for this section titled "Properly deflated". — Tenshi! (Talk page) 21:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your technical move request

Hello Tenshi Hinanawi, your recent request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests has been removed because it remained inactive for seventy-two hours after being contested. If you would like to proceed with your original request, please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Controversial.

This notification was delivered by TenshiBot. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the top of your current page (your user talk page) TenshiBot (talk) 14:22, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]