Talk:Ćaci u školu: Difference between revisions
+WP tags |
→Contested deletion: new section |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{WikiProject Politics}} |
{{WikiProject Politics}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Contested deletion == |
|||
I am writing to contest the speedy deletion nomination for the article "Ćaci u školu," as the reasons provided are incorrect. |
|||
To be clear, this article is not AI-generated. I wrote it myself, using standard online tools for grammar and translation assistance. AI detection tools are notoriously unreliable and should not be the sole basis for deletion, especially for an article that documents a verifiable, real-world event with specific dates and public documentation. |
|||
Regarding its notability, the subject clearly warrants a standalone article. What began as a graffiti misspelling has evolved into a significant political symbol in Serbia, central to the ongoing anti-corruption protests and the naming of the "Ćaciland" protest camp. This establishes it as a distinct and notable topic, not a POV fork. |
|||
The core issue is not a violation of Wikipedia policy, but a clear attempt to censor an article about a political symbol that is critical of the government. The article documents a significant, real-world event and should be allowed to remain --[[User:Mmns21|Mmns21]] ([[User talk:Mmns21|talk]]) 20:12, 19 June 2025 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:12, 19 June 2025
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
I am writing to contest the speedy deletion nomination for the article "Ćaci u školu," as the reasons provided are incorrect.
To be clear, this article is not AI-generated. I wrote it myself, using standard online tools for grammar and translation assistance. AI detection tools are notoriously unreliable and should not be the sole basis for deletion, especially for an article that documents a verifiable, real-world event with specific dates and public documentation.
Regarding its notability, the subject clearly warrants a standalone article. What began as a graffiti misspelling has evolved into a significant political symbol in Serbia, central to the ongoing anti-corruption protests and the naming of the "Ćaciland" protest camp. This establishes it as a distinct and notable topic, not a POV fork.
The core issue is not a violation of Wikipedia policy, but a clear attempt to censor an article about a political symbol that is critical of the government. The article documents a significant, real-world event and should be allowed to remain --Mmns21 (talk) 20:12, 19 June 2025 (UTC)