User talk:Edward Zigma: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:48, 3 July 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 84.21.145.26 (talk) 13:36, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Edward Zigma, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Wikipedia:Current events noticeboard. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 16:32, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at 2019 Delhi communal clash. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:45, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

●@NinjaRobotPirate: The fact is still thr same. That page was made with the intention to disrupt communal harmony. I said in talk page again and again to not drag any community as it can worsten thw situation. But he keep adding words like VIOLENT MUSLIM and ALL THAT. I just make an edit nothing else. I just want to know how to put a website in blacklists since the webistes he is using are defamatory to muslims. So I request you to tell him to cite with proper reliable webistes. The website he use are famous for spreading hate propaganda against muslims. And these siter cant be use for wikipedia citation. Second, I want you to consider him to not to use communal hatred words as their was no relgious slogan or chanting as from proper sources. As this is another propaganda against muslims. This is just a minor tiff and a local incident but if you want to keep it on wiki ,no issue. But It's a request to not to use that page to spread hate propaganda against any relgion.

● @Huhsyrup, Malcolmxl5, and NinjaRoboPirate: I again request all administrators that this user Harshil169 is involved in hatred posts and sockpuppeting very much. He is continuously posting tweets telling muslim extremists on wikipedia and all that. Here are some proofs. 1) https://twitter.com/Harshil_S_Mehta/status/1146065016090529794?s=19 In this he is calling people muslim extremists i.e. me. And request help from other users. 2) https://twitter.com/Harshil_S_Mehta/status/1146065016090529794?s=19 He started this by inciting hate that if lynching of muslim has wikipedia page...why cant we.

3) https://twitter.com/Harshil_S_Mehta/status/1146065016090529794?s=19 He is still conspiring with others to make more propaganda pages and is now involved in meat and sock puppeting despite warnings given by the adminstrators. This Harshil169 made the page with communal hatred ideology "Temple attack" but in reality it was a communal clash which worsten further on due to law n order issue. I have provided enough proofs to take proper measures as this is very bqd practice and wikipedia is the one true source for the knowledge. We cant let this disrupt.

I request the respected moderators and administrators @Huhsyrup, Malcolmxl5, and NinjaRoboPirate: to curb such practice on wikipedia. This is not a place to spread communal hatred and to desrupt social harmony. I hope you all respected members will take proper decisions to prevent this from happening.