User talk:Jonharojjashi: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:46, 6 January 2024

Welcome!

Hi Jonharojjashi! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! SKAG123 (talk) 01:51, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alert for India/Pakistan/Afghanistan related articles

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SKAG123 (talk) 01:51, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Please stop using "fixed typo" as the summary for every edit you make. The edit summary should adequately and accurately reflect the edit that was made. Uhai (talk) 12:39, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 12:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Second Parthian–Kushan War (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please refer to WP:CITEKILL and WP:BOMBARD

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Second Parthian–Kushan War and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:26, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jonharojjashi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:26, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Second Parthian–Kushan War has been accepted

Second Parthian–Kushan War, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:08, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Second Parthian–Kushan War for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Second Parthian–Kushan War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Parthian–Kushan War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HistoryofIran (talk) 21:24, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Second Parthian–Kushan War. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:20, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Second Parthian–Kushan War. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:07, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Your recent editing history at Muslim conquests in the Indian subcontinent shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Noorullah (talk) 03:29, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Gupta Empire into Draft:Vikramaditya's west Oxus valley campaign. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikramaditya's invasion of Sassanian Empire (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

Should be covered on Chandragupta II and only spun out into a separate article if necessary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vikramaditya's invasion of Sassanian Empire and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 00:34, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikramaditya's west Oxus valley campaign (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Chandragupta II's Campaign of Balkh. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This seems quite similar to Chandragupta II's Campaign of Balkh, is it the same campaign?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vikramaditya's west Oxus valley campaign and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 00:24, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikramaditya's foreign campaigns (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm not convinced this needs its own article. The information can be included in the Chandragupta II article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vikramaditya's foreign campaigns and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 11:50, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Military history of India. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:11, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Draft:Sassanian–Gupta conflicts. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:21, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, this was an incorrect templated message. — Diannaa (talk) 20:44, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Draft:Sassanian–Gupta conflicts has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 20:50, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Thane. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.-Imperial ^[AFCND] 10:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonharojjashi, Caliph Uthman wasn't the one who led the campaign to Thane. And Al Mugharia died in 570. How would he be in India in 636? Both are entirely different persons with same names. Imperial ^[AFCND] 12:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 10:37, 6 January 2024 edit ImperialAficionado (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 6,715 edits →January 2024 ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:46, 6 January 2024 edit undo ImperialAficionado (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 6,715 edits →January 2024: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 179:		Line 179:

	[[File:Information orange.svg\|25px\|alt=Information icon]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Battle of Thane]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism\|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting\|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use [[User:Jonharojjashi/sandbox\|your sandbox]]. Repeated vandalism may result in the [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|loss of editing privileges]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 -->-[[User:ImperialAficionado\|<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; color:Purple;">Imperial</span>]][[User talk:ImperialAficionado\|<span style="font-family: 'Garamond'; color:Darkblue;"><sup><nowiki>[AFCND]</nowiki></sup></span>]] 10:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)		[[File:Information orange.svg\|25px\|alt=Information icon]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Battle of Thane]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism\|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting\|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use [[User:Jonharojjashi/sandbox\|your sandbox]]. Repeated vandalism may result in the [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|loss of editing privileges]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 -->-[[User:ImperialAficionado\|<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; color:Purple;">Imperial</span>]][[User talk:ImperialAficionado\|<span style="font-family: 'Garamond'; color:Darkblue;"><sup><nowiki>[AFCND]</nowiki></sup></span>]] 10:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

			:@[[User:Jonharojjashi\|Jonharojjashi]], Caliph Uthman wasn't the one who led the campaign to Thane. And Al Mugharia died in 570. How would he be in India in 636? Both are entirely different persons with same names. [[User:ImperialAficionado\|<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; color:Purple;">Imperial</span>]][[User talk:ImperialAficionado\|<span style="font-family: 'Garamond'; color:Darkblue;"><sup><nowiki>[AFCND]</nowiki></sup></span>]] 12:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)