Jump to content

User talk:力: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 245: Line 245:
::::I would "pile on" here to caution Power that they should not have closed this. First, it was not eligible for SNOW treatment as there were six keep !votes, one delete-or-merge (the nominator), and one merge. So it was not true that it had only a "snowball's chance in hell" of any outcome but keep. Second, the discussion had only been open for twelve hours (!) - not even one full round of the global clock, excluding up to half of interested Wikepedians from even seeing it. Third, a discussion as divided as this one should probably not be closed by a non-admin, even if had been open for the regulation amount of time. NACs are for where the outcome is obvious, and this outcome wasn't. Please don't make a habit of this kind of reckless close. --[[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 20:29, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
::::I would "pile on" here to caution Power that they should not have closed this. First, it was not eligible for SNOW treatment as there were six keep !votes, one delete-or-merge (the nominator), and one merge. So it was not true that it had only a "snowball's chance in hell" of any outcome but keep. Second, the discussion had only been open for twelve hours (!) - not even one full round of the global clock, excluding up to half of interested Wikepedians from even seeing it. Third, a discussion as divided as this one should probably not be closed by a non-admin, even if had been open for the regulation amount of time. NACs are for where the outcome is obvious, and this outcome wasn't. Please don't make a habit of this kind of reckless close. --[[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 20:29, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
::::: Every time there's a shooting or vehicle attack in Europe, we get the exact same AfD discussion, and nothing ever happens. It's clear I closed it too early, but I do still expect a snow close within the next 24 hours. [[User:power~enwiki|power~enwiki]] ([[User talk:Power~enwiki|<span style="color:#FA0;font-family:courier">π</span>]], [[Special:Contributions/Power~enwiki|<span style="font-family:courier">ν</span>]]) 20:34, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
::::: Every time there's a shooting or vehicle attack in Europe, we get the exact same AfD discussion, and nothing ever happens. It's clear I closed it too early, but I do still expect a snow close within the next 24 hours. [[User:power~enwiki|power~enwiki]] ([[User talk:Power~enwiki|<span style="color:#FA0;font-family:courier">π</span>]], [[Special:Contributions/Power~enwiki|<span style="font-family:courier">ν</span>]]) 20:34, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
::::::If I may, that’s a problem with AfDs these days. RECENTISM and NOTNEWS need stronger language, IMO. AfDs result in keep far too often, partly because there are those that want additions that they think support some view that they have. It’s not just about inclusionism vs. exclusionism. It’s about filling the site with articles that they like for one reason or another. But, an encyclopedia is not meant to be an all-inclusive source. It’s meant for information that is likely to stand the test of time. [[User:Objective3000|O3000]] ([[User talk:Objective3000|talk]]) 00:26, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:26, 9 April 2018


  • I generally reply inline to comments posted here, and only rarely use {{replyto}}.

About ArbComm

That user has been causing issues at XfD for much longer. He derailed some of my nominations with stupid incorrect twisted policy comments. I don't think it has anything to do with NJ, and everything to do with his enjoying disrupting discussions. [1] Legacypac (talk) 17:45, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware of the other issues involving Unscintillating's AfD votes. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:46, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

19:44, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Matt Van Komen

Hello Power~enwiki. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Matt Van Komen, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: claims significance, has 250+ GNews hits, use WP:AFD instead. Thank you. SoWhy 10:12, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The claim of significance I saw (roughly, appearing in a "notable" high school basketball game) wasn't credible IMO. However, being 7'5 tall probably is. I probably won't bother with AfD despite WP:CRYSTAL; the page would be re-created soon anyway. power~enwiki (π, ν) 15:38, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Chilonia Union High School

Please published for me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masumasu11 (talkcontribs) 21:41, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Dr. Pepper's Jaded Hearts Club Band —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Audiovideodiscoo (talk) 03:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

15:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

PCR & Rollbacker

Hello Power~enwiki. Your account has been granted the "rollbacker" and "pending changes reviewer" user rights. These user rights allow you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes and quickly revert the edits of other users.

Rollback user right
Please keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
Pending changes reviewer user right
The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection enabled is located at Special:StablePages. You may find the following pages useful to review:

Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of reviewer or rollback. If you no longer want either of these user rights, contact me and I'll remove it, alternatively you can leave a request on the administrators' noticeboard. Happy editing! ~ Amory (utc) 20:35, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing your edits to your common.js and .css, I think maybe you might not want rollback? Will remove if you'd prefer. ~ Amory (utc) 00:54, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really care, I may use it for Huggle at some point. Pending-changes is definitely useful, though. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, just let me know! Happy editing! ~ Amory (utc) 01:01, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) .mw-rollback-link {display:none !important;} works perfectly in my vector.css. I think you were just missing the "!important" which prevents other rules setting it to "inline" etc... -- Begoon 02:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I got the CSS from User:Mr. Stradivarius/gadgets/ConfirmRollback. It's intended as a fallback there if there are script issues; I'm not sure if it should be updated or not. (and don't really care enough to find out) power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:44, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I just hide the links to prevent accidental clicks, because I prefer to use an edit summary so Twinkle is a better "rollback" option for me. -- Begoon 02:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autonomous Region of Ezidkhan and my talk page. There have been some confirmed socks involved in the past but the current article's creator isn't one of them. What's particularly annoying is that I admire the Yazidi struggle greatly, but using Wikipedia this way isn't appropriate. I'm on my iPad right now which I hate to use for editing and haven't compared the new version with the old, but it still doesn't seem to have sources newer than. Last September which is odd if this is really notable Doug Weller talk 06:16, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's virtually identical to the one deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autonomous Region of Ezidkhan(see the NORN discussion I link to there) which was created by a sock. There's a lovely attack on my talk page too. I seem to have offended all the mapmaker experts on Wikipedia while supporting genocide. Doug Weller talk 08:47, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I commented on that AfD, but apparently forgot about it. As you note, there continues to be no new sourcing for this group, and it's unclear what it is actually supposed to be (an Iraqi autonomous region or an independent country; a military government or a civilian one). power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:53, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Although he can't resist the personal attacks, I'm trying to engage with him on his talk page, but I don't think he's able to understand what we mean by original research. Doug Weller talk 19:50, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please provide a basis for each issue you have blanked on Pyo Chang-won so that we may get a discussion going? If you do now provide a basis, I'll assume there is no such basis to remove them and I'll just re-add them. Veritas et aequitas Korea (talk) 12:58, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your suggestion of a site ban for my account

Hello,

You

if I didn't "drop" a metaphorical "stick". I though fail to see where I would have violated any guideline, or in any other way disturbed the community. All I want to do is not to be called an

, a

, an

or

. In other words, my aim is not to be insulted, even though I'm not part of the community anymore. Hence, I would like to ask you to explain why you would support a ban, because I fail to understand your motive. --Mathmensch (talk) 07:16, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You seem uninterested in helping to build an encyclopedia, only in re-hashing old complaints. And apparently you've already found that out. power~enwiki (π, ν) 14:28, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article for deletion

Hi, Power enwiki! Thank you for your attention to Repair the World. You proposed the article for deletion for WP:ORGDEPTH. I read the rules, but I think I need your help. Could you please show me an example how to fix the article and remove the deletion template? Thank you beforehand, Lidiia Kondratieva (talk) 08:01, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration case request declined

The Arbitration Committee has declined the New Jersey-related AfDs arbitration case request, which you were listed as a party to. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:18, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I think you linked the wrong case

As per this edit at AN/I: 1, I would point out that the user there was an AlextheWhovian, not Adamstom97. Maybe you got things a little mixed up? - Jack Sebastian (talk) 02:08, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adamstom became involved there too. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:10, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you would find reading throught "voluminous" section to glean the point. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 02:58, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I not what say, gumshoe? (aka: no, respond to the thread I linked at ANI, or else I'll assume you have no defense to that this is an ongoing dispute). power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:00, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article Improvement

Is there a way for me to improve my article because on the list of suicides that have been attributed to bullying article hamed's name was on the list of suicides and there was no article about him so I decided to create an article to reduce the risk of his name being deleted on the suicide list. Please tell me some tips on how to improve my article that way it doesn't get deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous1941 (talkcontribs) 18:55, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're referring to Suicide of Hamed Nastoh. I don't have anything useful to suggest, beyond suggesting you comment at the deletion discussion rather than here. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:03, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

20:04, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Rules for ANI

Idiot is correct but maybe "unhelpful to your success" or "makes you look bad" Legacypac (talk) 19:40, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review Newsletter No.10

Hello 力, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

  • ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing

  • Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled

  • While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News

  • The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.

To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

19:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Psychologists for social change

Why did you delete the article I created? This is an important social policy thinktank in the UK, who have made significant publications to inform government policy, and represent a very large number of qualified clinical psychologists - I'm not a member, but I created the article as a clinical psychologist in the UK who has specialist knowledge of this topic and thought it was a very important omission to wikipedia not to mention them.

To give it some context, the ACP (association of clinical psychologists) is about to split away from the British Psychological Society (on which you have a page) to represent the 10,000 applied clinicians, leaving the BPS as an academic learned society, and psychologists for social change is an important group that spans the two but is there to speak out from the psychological evidence base on policy issues. I suspect wikipedia should eventually have a page on all three, but the vote for clinical psychologists to move en masse from the BPS to the ACP hasn't happened yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tegmim (talkcontribs) 21:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can't check the article myself to know for sure, but I probably did because it was written in a promotional way, with no secondary sources that attested to notability. This appears to be a minor advocacy group, and I'm unsure why the ACP or BPS are at all relevant here. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another bad close

Power, I know you want to walk the walk and look like an admin, but this is another bad close. You aren't an admin. You cannot declare a WP:SNOW close on something the day it is nominated when two voters supported a merge. Will it be closed any other way? Probably not, but, like I said, it is inappropriate for a non-admin to make that call at such a juncture.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 19:37, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with basically everything you say, but the rules are clear about contested and possibly controversial closes, so I'll revert. I expect an admin will re-close it within 24 hours. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:39, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You diagree with everything I said, yet reopened the discussion because of reasons I said. Alrighty! I was not trying to sound harsh. You have a much better chance at being an admin than I. Far more people hate me ;) TheGracefulSlick (talk) 19:50, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
How can anyone hate someone named Grace Slick? Well, she did take part in: We built this city. O3000 (talk) 20:12, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I would "pile on" here to caution Power that they should not have closed this. First, it was not eligible for SNOW treatment as there were six keep !votes, one delete-or-merge (the nominator), and one merge. So it was not true that it had only a "snowball's chance in hell" of any outcome but keep. Second, the discussion had only been open for twelve hours (!) - not even one full round of the global clock, excluding up to half of interested Wikepedians from even seeing it. Third, a discussion as divided as this one should probably not be closed by a non-admin, even if had been open for the regulation amount of time. NACs are for where the outcome is obvious, and this outcome wasn't. Please don't make a habit of this kind of reckless close. --MelanieN (talk) 20:29, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Every time there's a shooting or vehicle attack in Europe, we get the exact same AfD discussion, and nothing ever happens. It's clear I closed it too early, but I do still expect a snow close within the next 24 hours. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:34, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If I may, that’s a problem with AfDs these days. RECENTISM and NOTNEWS need stronger language, IMO. AfDs result in keep far too often, partly because there are those that want additions that they think support some view that they have. It’s not just about inclusionism vs. exclusionism. It’s about filling the site with articles that they like for one reason or another. But, an encyclopedia is not meant to be an all-inclusive source. It’s meant for information that is likely to stand the test of time. O3000 (talk) 00:26, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]