User talk:All4prof: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:15, 22 September 2020

Welcome!

Hello, All4prof, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:45, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Afritondo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Afritondo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:45, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Afritondo (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Afritondo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Afritondo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 20:28, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, All4prof! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 20:28, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Allwell Uwazuruike (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by M-Mustapha were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Allwell Uwazuruike and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Allwell Uwazuruike, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Em-mustapha ^talk 19:44, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Allwell Uwazuruike has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Allwell Uwazuruike. Thanks! Celestina007 (talk) 09:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Allwell Uwazuruike (September 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are still either interviews, primary, facebook, or make no more than a passing mention of subject. To meet notability guidelines we need secondary sources that give significant attention to the subject and all social media sources need to be removed. Nightenbelle (talk) 20:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Allwell Uwazuruike and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Allwell Uwazuruike, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 20:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Allwell Uwazuruike has been accepted

Allwell Uwazuruike, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Celestina007 (talk) 04:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Celestina007 (talk · contribs) This is good news. Thanks a lot for your kind assistance with this article. I, of course, undertake to develop it as time goes by. I am also looking forward to creating more articles and will hopefully build and brush up my editing skills along the way. User:all4prof

No worries, it’s a Friday, everyone deserves to be happy on a Friday. Thanks for creating the article. I urge you to keep on creating more articles. Please do not hesitate to ping me if need be. To sign your comments just add four {{Tildes}} at the end of any comment you make and it would sign appropriately. Happy weekend to you. Cheers. Celestina007 (talk) 15:49, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Haha. It is indeed a happy Friday. Will be sure to reach out should I need any help. Many thanks.All4prof (talk) 23:26, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inquiry

The photo on the article appears to be a selfie which wasn’t present at the time I accepted the article. Could you kindly explain how you got the selfie of the subject of your article? Or are you one & the same person as the subject of your article? Celestina007 (talk) 15:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Celestina007 Hola! I hope you are fine. Nooo! I'm not. Haha!! This is a screen grab off a story (don't recall now if Facebook or Insta story). Forgive my photo taking knowledge if I'm wrong, but I don't think this can even be a selfie given the angle and position of the arms. But again, I'm not a selfie expert so maybe some people can actually pull it off. And maybe I was a bit lazy at the time I uploaded this or would have found a better picture. The first one which I got online had been rejected as potentially a copyright violation (apparently it was also a Facebook picture post which I did not know at the time--I frankly am not sure I yet fully understand the copyright thing to be honest. Should probably have asked you about it). So instead of searching for another image online, which could also turn out to be a posted Facebook picture, I thought this was a safer bet. Apologies, still learning the many rules of Wikipedia; and as it probably turns out, maybe I'm not the fastest learner! Ha! All4prof (talk) 18:14, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 15:00, 22 September 2020 edit Celestina007 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 66,029 edits →Inquiry: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:15, 22 September 2020 edit undo All4prof (talk \| contribs) 64 edits →Inquiry Next edit →
Line 109:		Line 109:

	The photo on the article appears to be a selfie which wasn’t present at the time I accepted the article. Could you kindly explain how you got the selfie of the subject of your article? Or are you one & the same person as the subject of your article? '''[[User:Celestina007\|Celestina007]]''' ([[User talk:Celestina007\|talk]]) 15:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)		The photo on the article appears to be a selfie which wasn’t present at the time I accepted the article. Could you kindly explain how you got the selfie of the subject of your article? Or are you one & the same person as the subject of your article? '''[[User:Celestina007\|Celestina007]]''' ([[User talk:Celestina007\|talk]]) 15:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
			:[[User:Celestina007]] Hola! I hope you are fine. Nooo! I'm not. Haha!! This is a screen grab off a story (don't recall now if Facebook or Insta story). Forgive my photo taking knowledge if I'm wrong, but I don't think this can even be a selfie given the angle and position of the arms. But again, I'm not a selfie expert so maybe some people can actually pull it off. And maybe I was a bit lazy at the time I uploaded this or would have found a better picture. The first one which I got online had been rejected as potentially a copyright violation (apparently it was also a Facebook picture post which I did not know at the time--I frankly am not sure I yet fully understand the copyright thing to be honest. Should probably have asked you about it). So instead of searching for another image online, which could also turn out to be a posted Facebook picture, I thought this was a safer bet. Apologies, still learning the many rules of Wikipedia; and as it probably turns out, maybe I'm not the fastest learner! Ha! [[User:All4prof\|All4prof]] ([[User talk:All4prof#top\|talk]]) 18:14, 22 September 2020 (UTC)