User talk:Shkupi Kumanova 1234: Difference between revisions

Diplomatic missions in North Macedonia

Please provide a source stating that there is a Norwegian embassy in Skopje as the Norwegian Government states that the embassy is accredited from Belgrade, Serbia (https://www.norway.no/en/north-macedonia/). Aquintero82, (talk), 26 September 2020, 10:12 (UTC)

November 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 23:23, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kosovo War. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. adding tasteless photos, with dubious licensing The Banner talk 12:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kosovo War, you may be blocked from editing. POV-pushing The Banner talk 12:29, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of diplomatic missions in North Macedonia, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 16:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Markos Botsaris. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

I hardly think that making 2 unsourced edits as a new editor warrants an indef block. Remember: all of us were new editors at Wikipedia once, and in some ways (such as when editing an article on a topic outside our usual scope) even the most experienced among us are still newcomers. New editors should be welcomed in the community and policies should be explained to them, not indef blocked for making two edits - which can't be defined as "unsourced" in the first place. He only equated a native Albanian-speaker in the late 18th/early 19th century with nationally Albanian in the modern sense. It's not a stretch - no more unsourced than ascribiding the modern national Greek identity on the WP:LEDE. It's not that there are no sources that call this figure Albanian - there are plenty of them (The Albanian origins of the Tzavellas and the Botsaris families is a fact , especially since the pure and heroic Mark Botsaris , despite his limited education , and in order to bring closer the two peoples , wrote a Greek-Albanian dictionary ( 1809 ) (Karzes 2002), but national identity shouldn't be mentioned in the WP:LEDE of a figure who lived in the "pre-national demarcation" phase of the Balkans. The same is true about the label "Greek" on the WP:LEDE, which is a political projection onto the past. This is a complex discussion, which involves both explaining policies and engaging with different editors in an attempt to better understand the subject. --Maleschreiber (talk) 15:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Shkupi Kumanova 1234! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --Maleschreiber (talk) 15:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Adem Kastrati

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adem Kastrati, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Modussiccandi (talk) 20:30, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Removing CSD tag

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Adem Kastrati, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. I've seen that you removed the deletion tag from Adem Kastrati. You may not know this, but you should never remove deletion tags from pages you created yourself. Please try to avoid this in the future. Modussiccandi (talk) 20:43, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Adem Kastrati

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, we cannot accept Adem Kastrati in its current state for two serious reasons: 1) it needs far more citations to reliable, independent sources to support the various claims in the article and 2) the article is written in an extremely non-neutral tone, bad enough that it would qualify for G11 speedy deletion. My suggestion is that you allow the article to be moved to draft space so that you can improve it at your own pace. If you refuse, the article will likely be deleted for the aforementioned reasons. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:37, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Adem Kastrati

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adem Kastrati, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Celestina007 (talk) 21:39, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Adem Kastrati) for a period of 1 month for disruptive editing at Adem Kastrati. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:48, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Adem Kastrati moved to draftspace

Per the above concerns, I'm moving this article to draftspace. Please edit the article there. Once you've removed the promotional language and provided proper sources, you can resubmit it by pressing the Submit button on the draft. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:50, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Adem Kastrati

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adem Kastrati, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Celestina007 (talk) 21:55, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

You have been blocked temporarily from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:00, 25 December 2020 (UTC)