Related changes
Appearance
← AMD FX
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
29 June 2025
- diffhist Central processing unit 15:08 +255 14.151.17.224 talk (→Microprocessors)
- diffhist Epyc 14:36 +25 14.151.17.224 talk
- diffhist Intel Core 14:34 +140 14.151.17.224 talk (→Core and Core Ultra 3/5/7/9)
- diffhist AMD Am9080 13:35 −1 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (more accurate tag) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
- diffhist AMD Am9080 13:35 +4 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (+link) Tag: Visual edit
27 June 2025
- diffhist m Instruction set architecture 19:12 −31 LightlySeared talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by 78.149.38.121 (talk) to last revision by RastaKins) Tags: Twinkle Undo
- diffhist Instruction set architecture 19:12 +31 78.149.38.121 talk Tag: Reverted
- diffhist 64-bit computing 08:07 +282 125.90.10.178 talk (→History)
26 June 2025
- diffhist Zen 4 01:24 +1 91.137.22.25 talk
24 June 2025
- diffhist Am386 18:19 −1 Punpcklbw talk contribs (→Embedded Am386 processors: Fix link to the Am386EM datasheet)
- diffhist Personal computer 17:43 +4 77.20.48.108 talk (→1970s)
- diffhist m X86-64 12:06 −8 Regestriruisa talk contribs
23 June 2025
- diffhist 16-bit computing 23:00 +478 RastaKins talk contribs (→16-bit application: That discussion of 8, 16, and 32 bit microcontrollers should not be in the lead. I have rescued part of the material just deleted and put it in its own subsection. Alibaba and mouser aren't good refs.)
- diffhist 16-bit computing 20:33 −1,170 Em3rgent0rdr talk contribs (delete paragraph on microcontroller costs. E.g. "are more powerful, and easier to program generally), making 8-bit legacy microcontrollers not worth it for new applications" is opinion and not necessarily true. Cost is a moving target. Many other factors. The fact that 8-bits are still sold is proof they are "worth it". Anyways, "more powerful" isn't necessarily even desired for microcontroller...e.g. that amazing 1$ microcontroller article showed that the lowest power consumption was an 8-bit.) Tag: Visual edit