Related changes

20 June 2025

• diffhist m Ocean heat content 11:38 0 EinMathematikerInAustria talk contribs (Picture in the lead section made smaller for better layout. --~~~~)
• diffhist m Effects of climate change on human health 11:32 0 Dungrider1337 talk contribs (Removed underscores)
• diffhist m Ocean heat content 11:31 +6 EinMathematikerInAustria talk contribs (Picture of OHC 2020 included in the lead section. Picture in the section Observations and Changes put into second paragraph for better layout reasons (colliding picture with the previous section). --~~~~)
• diffhist Ocean heat content 11:05 +7,951 EinMathematikerInAustria talk contribs (As discussed extensively in the Talk section: Lead section shortened for better focus. Former additional essay-like paragraphs of the lead section moved to the corresponding sections. Guard against widespread misunderstanding included (because no system stores heat). Thermodynamic preliminaries included for better understanding, sections Definition and Measurements turned into first level sections. Additional references are to be included in the near future, also for history of OHC.--~~~~)
• diffhist Drought 10:59 +1,146 Calidumpluviam talk contribs (→Erosion and human activities: added references on soil drought) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist m The Economist 10:52 +1 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (minor grammar)
• diffhist The Economist 10:51 +327 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (added hatnote for misuse of citation & explanatory comment for future editors. I keep finding misused sources in this article, so the problem may extend further, I haven't checked everything.) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• diffhist The Economist 10:36 −29 Tomatoswoop talk contribs ("depth" as a reason for brand associations also not in source. (Is the economist known for more depth articles than other news & current affairs mags? the new yorker, new republic, newsweek, Harpers, the spectator, prospect, national review, etc.?) Is this whole article like this? Someone's opinion and vibes with sources added alongside to give it the appearance of factuality?) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 10:21 −851 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (yet again, claims not in source, seems to be a persistent problem with this article. (Incidentally, on this particular claim, there are sources already in the article that claim exactly the opposite). Rather than weigh in with a claim to the opposite wrt bias/objectivity, it seems better not to make a statement about it in the lede at all, it's obviously contested at the *least* though.) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist m Climate communication 09:30 −548 Count Count talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by 119.82.253.132 (talk) to last revision by OAbot) Tags: Twinkle Undo
• diffhist Climate communication 09:29 +548 119.82.253.132 talk (→Bibliography) Tag: Reverted
• diffhist Charles David Keeling 06:54 +331 Renerpho talk contribs (→Personal life: Adding obituary as citation. On the 20th anniversary of your death, Mr. Keeling, I hope your efforts have not been in vain.)
• diffhist The Economist 06:22 +934 AnomieBOT talk contribs (Rescuing orphaned refs ("isnewspaper" from rev 1296453716; "Iber-2019" from rev 1296453716))
• diffhist The Economist 04:15 +316 Tomatoswoop talk contribs Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist Pennsylvania State University 03:42 −207 ElKevbo talk contribs (→Rankings: low contrast)
• diffhist Pennsylvania State University 03:42 −45 ElKevbo talk contribs (→Rankings: MOS:SMALL)
• diffhist The Economist 03:39 +1 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (*as much a newspaper as, I meant to write. Oh to be able to edit edit summaries...)
• diffhist The Economist 03:35 −8 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (I walk the line. The article need not choose. ....I mean it's as much a magazine as the news statesman or private eye or the week or the Spectator or Tribune is really, but hey, porque no los dos! And may the lord spare us from this causing any future edit wars...) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• diffhist University of California, Berkeley 03:19 −15 ElKevbo talk contribs (→Reputation and rankings: MOS:SMALL)
• diffhist The Economist 03:07 −1,118 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (also poorly sourced (and strangely linked, almost to make a point). Maybe it's best just to leave "format" and "type" out of it altogether, it's really not that important) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 02:57 +24 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (→Tone and voice: Last one of these. The one source there that did express a view expressed the opposite one that was previously stated so... Now the article reflects its sources) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 02:47 −145 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (→Tone and voice: yet again, the cited material isn't actually in the sources. One just repeated that the economist calls itself that, another totally off topic. This is so pointless but still, how silly! Someone must have '''really'''' cared about this!) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 02:36 −227 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (you know... I'm only even looking at this because of a slightly weird invisible comment that seemed strangely insistent, but now here I am.... Can't find any source for this claim either, and the given source just sends you a link to a database which classes it as a "journal,magazine"! The house of cards from a 15 year old pointless edit war is falling down! 😂) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 02:28 −1,526 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (So I can't actually find any source for this claim that doesn't point back here, so I think it's quite probably just made up? Are News Magazines / News Weeklies even legally distinct from Weekly Newspapers in the US or UK at all? idk, but I can't find anything about it...) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist m The Economist 02:26 −46 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (removing wikilink to an 1800s law no longer in force) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 02:24 +344 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (→Tone and voice: added "not in source" tags. The source for being "legally classified" as a newpaper in the UK and the US is this is just a seemingly fairly random section of pages that obliquely refer to the name of some legal entities associated with the publication. If they named their company "Economist potatoes group" that wouldn't make them legally classified as farmers by the UK and US government! 😅. The other source also bears no potatoes (or tubers)) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• diffhist The Economist 02:08 −311 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (weird as hell source to use for this lol, an conversation with a 10 year old pitched in this article as "the editor clarified the situation" lmao. Added a text source instead 🙃) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist Arctic sea ice decline 01:41 +307 Mllhnkz talk contribs (→Future ice loss: Added yet another source) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 01:39 −83 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (fixing in prev edit mistakes)
• diffhist Arctic sea ice decline 01:36 +669 Mllhnkz talk contribs (Added three more sources) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist Arctic sea ice decline 01:26 +289 Mllhnkz talk contribs (Added another source) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 01:26 −341 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (after chasing down that talk list, it ends up at a 16 year old discussion with little input, the apparent decider of which declared they were a COI editor, cannot think of a worse reason to include this guidance (to the word) directly in the article body lol) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• diffhist Retreat of glaciers since 1850 01:12 +302 Mllhnkz talk contribs (Added another source) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist Climate change in Antarctica 00:50 +1,263 Mllhnkz talk contribs (Added more fact checking sources) Tag: Visual edit

19 June 2025

• diffhist m Ozone depletion 23:02 +9 Ponyo talk contribs (rv whatever this is supposed to be) Tag: Rollback
• diffhist Ozone depletion 22:04 −9 91.186.253.26 talk Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• diffhist m Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere 21:22 −2 Aadirulez8 talk contribs (v2.05 - Fix errors for CW project (Spelling and typography)) Tag: WPCleaner
• diffhist Climate movement 20:45 −2 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (no sentences) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist Climate justice 20:43 −1 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (no sentence) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist Media coverage of climate change 19:19 −2,809 Helpful Raccoon talk contribs (remove WP:UNDUE mention of initiative sourced to PR churnalism; certainly doesn't belong in the lead) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist m Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere 19:04 −4 Aadirulez8 talk contribs (v2.05 - Auto / Fix errors for CW project (Template value ends with break)) Tag: WPCleaner
• diffhist 2024 in climate change 18:40 −3 RCraig09 talk contribs (arrange display of quote box and image)
• diffhist 2024 in climate change 18:36 +1,269 RCraig09 talk contribs (→Summaries: add James Hansen quote)
• diffhist 2023 in climate change 18:35 +639 RCraig09 talk contribs (→Summaries: sourcing for Hansen quote)
• diffhist 2023 in climate change 18:30 +629 RCraig09 talk contribs (→Summaries: add quotebox with James Hansen quote)
• diffhist Climate change denial 18:17 +938 RCraig09 talk contribs (→Related publications: (new section) "Information Integrity about Climate Science: A Systematic Review" (PDF). Zurich, Switzerland: International Panel on the Information Environment (IPIE). June 2025.)
• diffhist Media coverage of climate change 17:36 +7 Chris Capoccia talk contribs (→Further reading)
• diffhist Media coverage of climate change 17:18 −80 Chris Capoccia talk contribs (→United Kingdom)
• diffhist Media coverage of climate change 17:11 −479 Chris Capoccia talk contribs (→To achieve climate action)
• diffhist Cloud feedback 17:02 −62 Flovanh talk contribs (Page incorrectly suggests that clouds affect radiation because they contain water vapour, when it’s actually because they contain liquid and ice particles. This is also discussed in the original Stephens et al. 2025 paper, cited by the page, but incorrectly interpreted) Tag: Visual edit