Related changes
Appearance
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
6 June 2025
- diffhist Christianity 23:45 0 Remsense talk contribs (though, i say we need not shout in these messages)
- diffhist m Christianity 23:14 +169 Balsam Cottonwood talk contribs (at least two editors have changed the image already, just avoiding further problems)
- diffhist m First Nations in Canada 14:52 −3 Materialscientist talk contribs (Reverted edits by Betaboi1234 (talk) (HG) (3.4.13)) Tags: Huggle Rollback
- diffhist First Nations in Canada 14:51 +3 Betaboi1234 talk contribs Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Christianity 12:44 −88 Durziil89 talk contribs (Rv, there is an ongoing discussion on the talk page. Please wait until we reach consensus. Some users have suggested including a picture of a cross) Tag: Manual revert
- diffhist Christianity 12:08 0 AimanAbir18plus talk contribs Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Christianity 12:07 +88 AimanAbir18plus talk contribs (Christianity is not about worsphipping a holy building/church like the black box/Kaaba of Islam. Christianity is about worshiping Jesus. So, restored the img of Jesus (even the lead sentence says this that Jesus is the central figure of the faith)) Tag: Reverted
5 June 2025
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Notability 20:35 0 Legend of 14 talk contribs (→General notability guideline: placing anchor on the right paragraph)
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Notability 20:34 +31 Legend of 14 talk contribs (→General notability guideline: added an anchor)
4 June 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reliable sources 20:11 −2 Butwhatdoiknow talk contribs (→Scholarship: copy edit)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Merging 14:20 −3 Klbrain talk contribs (→Proposing a merge: 'Should'' to 'can'; there does doesn't seem to be a need for compulsion - controversial topics are well-watched, so template are more likely to be noticed.)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reliable sources 13:34 −4 Gog the Mild talk contribs (Copy edit)
- diffhist Historical revisionism 12:58 −1,241 Jclaxp talk contribs (→Battle of Agincourt: Removed battle of Agincourt section. The source is from 2005 and hasn't been updated. Re-add if there are new quality sources) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App select source
3 June 2025
- diffhist ImagineNATIVE Film and Media Arts Festival 22:48 +26 Bearcat talk contribs (→Jeff Barnaby Grant)
- diffhist Wab Kinew 10:06 +8,137 CycloneYoris talk contribs (Reverted 1 pending edit by 207.60.87.25 to revision 1291645391 by Skywatcher68: Without proof? Content is properly sourced.) Tag: Manual revert
- diffhist Wab Kinew 09:44 −8,137 207.60.87.25 talk (This information is defamatory and not relevant to Wab Kinew's current. It should not be posted without proof. He is also a respected MP. The information about his early life should be productive.) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
2 June 2025
- diffhist Christianity 16:15 −172 Doug Weller talk contribs (Reverted good faith edits by Austien Robin (talk): Not what main article says) Tags: Twinkle Undo
- diffhist Christianity 15:53 +168 Austien Robin talk contribs (→Early Christianity: Sects of Early Church) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Christianity 15:47 +4 Austien Robin talk contribs (→Early Christianity) Tag: Reverted
1 June 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:Merging 18:14 +15 Mathglot talk contribs (→Proposing a merge: Let's try flipping it around, so the lead sentence of the section is about initiating a proposing a merge via discussion, which is after all, the section's main purpose. The part about a bold merge now appears just after that intro, and I think makes more sense this way.)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Merging 18:03 −9 Mathglot talk contribs (→Proposing a merge: Tweaking shortcut placement, but there are pros and cons: pro: this seems clearer and places each one next to the content it applies to; con: it places INIT and PROP below BOLD, although the latter refers only to a sentence. Might be better to rearrange the text, so that the section is described first, and bold only in a latter sentence, as it is a minor part of this section, and place BOLD below the others.)