Related changes

23 June 2025

• diffhist United States 12:29 +39 Shoreranger talk contribs (→Cuisine) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist United States 11:42 −154 Snowstormfigorion talk contribs (condense as per MOS:INTRO, WP:UNDUE; see talk)
• diffhist United States 04:17 −53 Indonesianinfo2 talk contribs (←Removed redirect to Bali Regional House of Representatives) Tags: Removed redirect Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• diffhist United States 04:17 +53 Indonesianinfo2 talk contribs (Test) Tags: New redirect Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• diffhist United States 02:17 +42 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (+link) Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist United States 02:14 −348 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (Remove this sentence as it's not necessary, the info rather trivial, and just bloats the first paragraph of the lead. Yes, some good and featured country articles do have similar listings (e.g., Germany's last sentence of the lead's first paragraph), but they mostly include selected states/regions/cities whose mentions make sense regarding context. Meanwhile, this listing's purpose is not apparent and to me feels more like an end in itself.) Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist United States 00:30 +29 Shoreranger talk contribs Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

22 June 2025

• diffhist United States 16:18 −80 Mason.Jones talk contribs (→Cuisine: Scale back. For this short Cuisine section, the text is so detailed and clunky with factoids it's unreadable.)
• diffhist United States 08:24 0 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (removed misleading link in infobox, as it's not specifically American English which has been declared the official language of the U.S.) Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist United States 07:16 0 Absolutiva talk contribs (More specific link to American English article) Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor
• diffhist United States 03:45 +24 Shoreranger talk contribs (→Cuisine) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist United States 03:37 +54 Shoreranger talk contribs (→Cuisine) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

21 June 2025

• diffhist United States 22:08 +7 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (Lead should be in accordance with the article body, which says that this designation has been challenged by scholars. Therefore, it is not appropriate to present this in the lead as an absolute claim. This is why I replaced it with an undisputed one; you may re-insert the old one, but then must use a wording that is in accordance with what stands in the body.) Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist United States 20:43 +1 Mason.Jones talk contribs (→National government: Typo) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• diffhist United States 19:47 −12 Mason.Jones talk contribs (→Sports: U.S. Open (golf) and the Masters are two different golf tournaments; the Masters should be linked to WP article Masters Tournament, not the U.S. Open)
• diffhist United States 19:38 +75 Mason.Jones talk contribs (Clarity and improved syntax (just a suggested outline, but it should read better).)
• diffhist United States 16:13 +1 Shoreranger talk contribs (→Sports) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist United States 16:11 +172 Shoreranger talk contribs (→Sports) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist United States 15:52 +414 Shoreranger talk contribs (→Cuisine) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist United States 15:28 +4 Shoreranger talk contribs (→Fashion) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist United States 15:25 +4 Shoreranger talk contribs (→Cinema) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist United States 15:15 +57 Shoreranger talk contribs (→National government) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist The Economist 12:55 −73 JMF talk contribs (→Country of the Year: Debold all per mos:bold) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist United States 12:11 +126 Tpbradbury talk contribs (→Religion: fix reference)
• diffhist m United States 10:30 −320 Tpbradbury talk contribs (→Westward expansion and Civil War (1800–1865): remove dead link)
• diffhist m The Wall Street Journal 02:53 −522 TonySt talk contribs (Reverted edits by 49.146.140.80 (talk) (AV)) Tags: AntiVandal Rollback
• diffhist The Wall Street Journal 02:52 +522 49.146.140.80 talk (https://www.philstar.com/business/2024/05/31/2359374/pal-halt-baguio-cebu-flights) Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• diffhist The Economist 02:12 +6 2001:1970:55db:5c00:c905:ee66:ed37:f2f1 talk (Bolded Bangladesh to fit with rest of countries) Tag: Visual edit

20 June 2025

• diffhist United States 19:35 +231 Tigerdude9 talk contribs (Improved citation.) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source
• diffhist United States 15:44 −33 Mason.Jones talk contribs (Replace sentence. "British colonization saw ...these colonies" expand" is faulty, as it references details in a minor descriptive clause ("with the first settlement...").)
• diffhist m The Economist 10:52 +1 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (minor grammar)
• diffhist The Economist 10:51 +327 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (added hatnote for misuse of citation & explanatory comment for future editors. I keep finding misused sources in this article, so the problem may extend further, I haven't checked everything.) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• diffhist The Economist 10:36 −29 Tomatoswoop talk contribs ("depth" as a reason for brand associations also not in source. (Is the economist known for more depth articles than other news & current affairs mags? the new yorker, new republic, newsweek, Harpers, the spectator, prospect, national review, etc.?) Is this whole article like this? Someone's opinion and vibes with sources added alongside to give it the appearance of factuality?) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 10:21 −851 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (yet again, claims not in source, seems to be a persistent problem with this article. (Incidentally, on this particular claim, there are sources already in the article that claim exactly the opposite). Rather than weigh in with a claim to the opposite wrt bias/objectivity, it seems better not to make a statement about it in the lede at all, it's obviously contested at the *least* though.) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist United States 08:36 −598 Gonzafer001 talk contribs (Changed my mind. I believe this would be better for talk page.) Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist United States 08:31 +598 Gonzafer001 talk contribs (With both domestic and foreign use of "American Empire", I believe it’s more than necessary to add it to the intro… - I’m willing to discuss it if people object.) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist The Economist 06:22 +934 AnomieBOT talk contribs (Rescuing orphaned refs ("isnewspaper" from rev 1296453716; "Iber-2019" from rev 1296453716))
• diffhist The Economist 04:15 +316 Tomatoswoop talk contribs Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 03:39 +1 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (*as much a newspaper as, I meant to write. Oh to be able to edit edit summaries...)
• diffhist The Economist 03:35 −8 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (I walk the line. The article need not choose. ....I mean it's as much a magazine as the news statesman or private eye or the week or the Spectator or Tribune is really, but hey, porque no los dos! And may the lord spare us from this causing any future edit wars...) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• diffhist The Economist 03:07 −1,118 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (also poorly sourced (and strangely linked, almost to make a point). Maybe it's best just to leave "format" and "type" out of it altogether, it's really not that important) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 02:57 +24 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (→Tone and voice: Last one of these. The one source there that did express a view expressed the opposite one that was previously stated so... Now the article reflects its sources) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 02:47 −145 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (→Tone and voice: yet again, the cited material isn't actually in the sources. One just repeated that the economist calls itself that, another totally off topic. This is so pointless but still, how silly! Someone must have '''really'''' cared about this!) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 02:36 −227 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (you know... I'm only even looking at this because of a slightly weird invisible comment that seemed strangely insistent, but now here I am.... Can't find any source for this claim either, and the given source just sends you a link to a database which classes it as a "journal,magazine"! The house of cards from a 15 year old pointless edit war is falling down! 😂) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 02:28 −1,526 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (So I can't actually find any source for this claim that doesn't point back here, so I think it's quite probably just made up? Are News Magazines / News Weeklies even legally distinct from Weekly Newspapers in the US or UK at all? idk, but I can't find anything about it...) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist m The Economist 02:26 −46 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (removing wikilink to an 1800s law no longer in force) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 02:24 +344 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (→Tone and voice: added "not in source" tags. The source for being "legally classified" as a newpaper in the UK and the US is this is just a seemingly fairly random section of pages that obliquely refer to the name of some legal entities associated with the publication. If they named their company "Economist potatoes group" that wouldn't make them legally classified as farmers by the UK and US government! 😅. The other source also bears no potatoes (or tubers)) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• diffhist The Economist 02:08 −311 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (weird as hell source to use for this lol, an conversation with a 10 year old pitched in this article as "the editor clarified the situation" lmao. Added a text source instead 🙃) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 01:39 −83 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (fixing in prev edit mistakes)
• diffhist The Economist 01:26 −341 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (after chasing down that talk list, it ends up at a 16 year old discussion with little input, the apparent decider of which declared they were a COI editor, cannot think of a worse reason to include this guidance (to the word) directly in the article body lol) Tag: Visual edit: Switched