Related changes

Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.

Namespace:	Invert selection Associated namespace
Tag filter:	Invert selection
Page name:	Show changes to pages linked to the given page instead

List of abbreviations (help):

D: Edit made at Wikidata
r: Edit flagged by ORES
N: New page
m: Minor edit
b: Bot edit
(±123): Page byte size change
: Temporarily watched page

25 June 2025

diffhist Bill Gates 01:41 +6 Natg 19 talk contribs (not "college")
diffhist Bill Gates 01:40 +3 Natg 19 talk contribs (university)

23 June 2025

diffhist Bill Gates 19:25 +23 Iggy pop goes the weasel talk contribs (Added {{POV}} tag: Controversy headings) Tag: Twinkle
diffhist Artificial intelligence 02:25 −1 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (this part of the sentence also relates to the development after 2012, so removed comma to make this more clear) Tag: Visual edit

22 June 2025

diffhist Bill Gates 08:49 −40 Absolutiva talk contribs (Restored revision 1296736339 by Absolutiva (talk): There are fewer relatives in this article) Tags: Twinkle Undo
diffhist Bill Gates 08:46 +40 Absolutiva talk contribs Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor

21 June 2025

diffhist Bill Gates 22:56 +34 Absolutiva talk contribs (→Marriage, family and divorce: Add see also hatnote) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
diffhist Bill Gates 21:54 +35 Absolutiva talk contribs (→top: Added notable children to infobox) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
diffhist Bill Gates 21:53 +855 Absolutiva talk contribs (→Marriage, family and divorce: Added another notable relative) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
diffhist The Economist 12:55 −73 JMF talk contribs (→Country of the Year: Debold all per mos:bold) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
diffhist The Economist 02:12 +6 2001:1970:55db:5c00:c905:ee66:ed37:f2f1 talk (Bolded Bangladesh to fit with rest of countries) Tag: Visual edit

20 June 2025

diffhist Artificial intelligence 22:57 −39 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (→Natural language processing: an example is probably overkill here; it should be quite clear what is meant with a human language) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 22:55 0 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (→Natural language processing: made more clear what this reference is supposed to verify) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 22:36 +321 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (→Deep learning: imported a reference from the "Machine learning" article) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 22:34 +4 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (→Learning: +link in caption) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 22:33 +36 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (→Learning: expanded caption by importing content from "Machine learning") Tag: Visual edit
diffhist m The Economist 10:52 +1 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (minor grammar)
diffhist The Economist 10:51 +327 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (added hatnote for misuse of citation & explanatory comment for future editors. I keep finding misused sources in this article, so the problem may extend further, I haven't checked everything.) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
diffhist The Economist 10:36 −29 Tomatoswoop talk contribs ("depth" as a reason for brand associations also not in source. (Is the economist known for more depth articles than other news & current affairs mags? the new yorker, new republic, newsweek, Harpers, the spectator, prospect, national review, etc.?) Is this whole article like this? Someone's opinion and vibes with sources added alongside to give it the appearance of factuality?) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist The Economist 10:21 −851 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (yet again, claims not in source, seems to be a persistent problem with this article. (Incidentally, on this particular claim, there are sources already in the article that claim exactly the opposite). Rather than weigh in with a claim to the opposite wrt bias/objectivity, it seems better not to make a statement about it in the lede at all, it's obviously contested at the *least* though.) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 08:33 −14 Alenoach talk contribs (Rephrased a sentence) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist The Economist 06:22 +934 AnomieBOT talk contribs (Rescuing orphaned refs ("isnewspaper" from rev 1296453716; "Iber-2019" from rev 1296453716))
diffhist Artificial intelligence 05:07 +1 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (consistent plural) Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 04:58 +18 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (grammar) Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 04:57 +9 Maxeto0910 talk contribs Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 04:56 −9 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (more concise) Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 04:50 −18 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (redundant) Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 04:45 +867 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (expanded) Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 04:31 +10 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (more accurate) Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 04:30 0 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (better reading flow) Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 04:28 −13 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (certainly not true for AI-generated video back then; we're only getting there now) Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
diffhist The Economist 04:15 +316 Tomatoswoop talk contribs Tag: Visual edit
diffhist The Economist 03:39 +1 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (*as much a newspaper as, I meant to write. Oh to be able to edit edit summaries...)
diffhist The Economist 03:35 −8 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (I walk the line. The article need not choose. ....I mean it's as much a magazine as the news statesman or private eye or the week or the Spectator or Tribune is really, but hey, porque no los dos! And may the lord spare us from this causing any future edit wars...) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
diffhist Artificial intelligence 03:25 +7 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (→Deep learning: better reading flow) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 03:24 +8 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (→Learning: +links in caption) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 03:23 +127 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (→Learning: added caption) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 03:19 +8 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (→Deep learning: +links in caption) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 03:18 +93 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (→Deep learning: added caption) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 03:16 −4 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (consistency throughout the article) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 03:09 +1 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (→Deep learning: made more clear what this reference is supposed to verify) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist The Economist 03:07 −1,118 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (also poorly sourced (and strangely linked, almost to make a point). Maybe it's best just to leave "format" and "type" out of it altogether, it's really not that important) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 03:04 0 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (→Applications) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 03:02 −4 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (→Planning and decision-making: "Reward function" redirects to "Reinforcement learning", which is already linked before in the same subsection, so removed double link to this article) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 03:00 0 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (reference relates to this statement; the definition of AGI is already sourced in the body of the article) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist The Economist 02:57 +24 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (→Tone and voice: Last one of these. The one source there that did express a view expressed the opposite one that was previously stated so... Now the article reflects its sources) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist Artificial intelligence 02:50 +10 Maxeto0910 talk contribs (→Games: updated article title) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist The Economist 02:47 −145 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (→Tone and voice: yet again, the cited material isn't actually in the sources. One just repeated that the economist calls itself that, another totally off topic. This is so pointless but still, how silly! Someone must have '''really'''' cared about this!) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist The Economist 02:36 −227 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (you know... I'm only even looking at this because of a slightly weird invisible comment that seemed strangely insistent, but now here I am.... Can't find any source for this claim either, and the given source just sends you a link to a database which classes it as a "journal,magazine"! The house of cards from a 15 year old pointless edit war is falling down! 😂) Tag: Visual edit
diffhist The Economist 02:28 −1,526 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (So I can't actually find any source for this claim that doesn't point back here, so I think it's quite probably just made up? Are News Magazines / News Weeklies even legally distinct from Weekly Newspapers in the US or UK at all? idk, but I can't find anything about it...) Tag: Visual edit