Related changes

20 June 2025

• diffhist New South Wales XPT 11:52 −1 Willthorpe talk contribs (→Accidents and incidents) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist New South Wales XPT 11:51 +88 Willthorpe talk contribs (Undid revision 1296510783 by FunkyNachos (talk) Per the source: 'The traction motor rating and gearing were selected on the basis of one power car hauling four passenger cars up the 17 km long l-in-30 gradient on the Unanderra to Moss Vale line and also took into account the possibility that XPT sets may regularly need to restart on gradients of 1-in-40 if manual tablet exchange is 'not replaced by CTC.') Tag: Undo
• diffhist m New South Wales XPT 11:40 −88 FunkyNachos talk contribs ("gearing lowered for a top operating speed of {{convert|160|km/h|mph|abbr=on|round=10}}" was removed, as Diesel-Electric Locomotives do not have gearing, they use an Electric Drivetrain, a generator attached to the engine, and an electric motor inside the bogey. ADDITIONALLY, elsewhere the article correctly states that the maximum speed designed to be operated at is 200km/h. The XPT has operated at excess of 160km/h numerous times (1981 & 1992). It however has a revenue SERVICE speed of 160km/h) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
• diffhist m New South Wales XPT 11:36 +88 FunkyNachos talk contribs (Undid revision 1296510267 by FunkyNachos (talk)) Tags: Undo Reverted
• diffhist m New South Wales XPT 11:35 −88 FunkyNachos talk contribs ("gearing lowered for a top operating speed of {{convert|160|km/h|mph|abbr=on|round=10}}" was removed, as Diesel-Electric Locomotives do not have gearing, they use an Electric Drivetrain, a generator attached to the engine, and an electric motor inside the bogey.) Tags: Reverted Visual edit: Switched
• diffhist m The Economist 10:52 +1 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (minor grammar)
• diffhist The Economist 10:51 +327 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (added hatnote for misuse of citation & explanatory comment for future editors. I keep finding misused sources in this article, so the problem may extend further, I haven't checked everything.) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• diffhist The Economist 10:36 −29 Tomatoswoop talk contribs ("depth" as a reason for brand associations also not in source. (Is the economist known for more depth articles than other news & current affairs mags? the new yorker, new republic, newsweek, Harpers, the spectator, prospect, national review, etc.?) Is this whole article like this? Someone's opinion and vibes with sources added alongside to give it the appearance of factuality?) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 10:21 −851 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (yet again, claims not in source, seems to be a persistent problem with this article. (Incidentally, on this particular claim, there are sources already in the article that claim exactly the opposite). Rather than weigh in with a claim to the opposite wrt bias/objectivity, it seems better not to make a statement about it in the lede at all, it's obviously contested at the *least* though.) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist Public transport 10:12 −168 Seasider53 talk contribs (Undid revision 1296493169 by 102.223.58.133 (talk) too many images already) Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist Public transport 09:30 +168 102.223.58.133 talk (→Airline) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• diffhist United States 08:36 −598 Gonzafer001 talk contribs (Changed my mind. I believe this would be better for talk page.) Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist United States 08:31 +598 Gonzafer001 talk contribs (With both domestic and foreign use of "American Empire", I believe it’s more than necessary to add it to the intro… - I’m willing to discuss it if people object.) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist English Wikipedia 08:01 +62 Absolutiva talk contribs Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
• diffhist The Beatles 07:30 +54 DaveTheBrave talk contribs Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist The Economist 06:22 +934 AnomieBOT talk contribs (Rescuing orphaned refs ("isnewspaper" from rev 1296453716; "Iber-2019" from rev 1296453716))
• diffhist University of Sydney 06:18 −29 Jace Aotearoa AU talk contribs (Fix double link)
• diffhist The Economist 04:15 +316 Tomatoswoop talk contribs Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 03:39 +1 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (*as much a newspaper as, I meant to write. Oh to be able to edit edit summaries...)
• diffhist The Economist 03:35 −8 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (I walk the line. The article need not choose. ....I mean it's as much a magazine as the news statesman or private eye or the week or the Spectator or Tribune is really, but hey, porque no los dos! And may the lord spare us from this causing any future edit wars...) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• diffhist m Australia 03:27 +1 Johnn Francis talk contribs (Punctuation.)
• diffhist The Economist 03:07 −1,118 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (also poorly sourced (and strangely linked, almost to make a point). Maybe it's best just to leave "format" and "type" out of it altogether, it's really not that important) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 02:57 +24 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (→Tone and voice: Last one of these. The one source there that did express a view expressed the opposite one that was previously stated so... Now the article reflects its sources) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 02:47 −145 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (→Tone and voice: yet again, the cited material isn't actually in the sources. One just repeated that the economist calls itself that, another totally off topic. This is so pointless but still, how silly! Someone must have '''really'''' cared about this!) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 02:36 −227 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (you know... I'm only even looking at this because of a slightly weird invisible comment that seemed strangely insistent, but now here I am.... Can't find any source for this claim either, and the given source just sends you a link to a database which classes it as a "journal,magazine"! The house of cards from a 15 year old pointless edit war is falling down! 😂) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 02:28 −1,526 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (So I can't actually find any source for this claim that doesn't point back here, so I think it's quite probably just made up? Are News Magazines / News Weeklies even legally distinct from Weekly Newspapers in the US or UK at all? idk, but I can't find anything about it...) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist m The Economist 02:26 −46 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (removing wikilink to an 1800s law no longer in force) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 02:24 +344 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (→Tone and voice: added "not in source" tags. The source for being "legally classified" as a newpaper in the UK and the US is this is just a seemingly fairly random section of pages that obliquely refer to the name of some legal entities associated with the publication. If they named their company "Economist potatoes group" that wouldn't make them legally classified as farmers by the UK and US government! 😅. The other source also bears no potatoes (or tubers)) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• diffhist The Economist 02:08 −311 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (weird as hell source to use for this lol, an conversation with a 10 year old pitched in this article as "the editor clarified the situation" lmao. Added a text source instead 🙃) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist The Economist 01:39 −83 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (fixing in prev edit mistakes)
• diffhist The Economist 01:26 −341 Tomatoswoop talk contribs (after chasing down that talk list, it ends up at a 16 year old discussion with little input, the apparent decider of which declared they were a COI editor, cannot think of a worse reason to include this guidance (to the word) directly in the article body lol) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• diffhist Australia Day debate 01:25 0 GraziePrego talk contribs (aus spelling) Tag: Visual edit

19 June 2025

• diffhist Rudyard Kipling 20:51 −269 Keeper of Albion talk contribs (British English, links. Removing American English false titles and introductory commas.) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist m Queen Victoria Building 19:46 +1 ZKang123 talk contribs (script-assisted date audit and style fixes per MOS:NUM) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• diffhist Public transport 19:27 −102 GleisReis talk contribs (Undid revision 1296392747 by 102.223.58.133 (talk) similar photo already shown in profile pic) Tag: Undo
• diffhist Public transport 18:57 +102 102.223.58.133 talk (→Airline: Update) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• diffhist m Journalist 14:23 0 Melissa0705 talk contribs
• diffhist m Oberon Tarana Heritage Railway 12:00 +12 Thryduulf talk contribs ({{convert}}) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist United States 11:20 +24 TatjanaClimate talk contribs (→Climate: Update sentence on drought for clarity. Updated reference.) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist Joan Baez 10:18 +283 Ealinggirl1954 talk contribs (Added a missing citation) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist Light rail 09:31 −564 KatVanHuis talk contribs (Reorganisation of images.)
• diffhist Sydney 06:36 −104 Weirdguyz talk contribs (Reverted 2 pending edits by LionKing2019 to revision 1295873586 by Seasider53: Unnecessary level of detail here, also factually incorrect) Tag: Manual revert
• diffhist Sydney 06:33 +41 LionKing2019 talk contribs (Added a little more info.) Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• diffhist Sydney 06:28 +63 LionKing2019 talk contribs (Added a link and more info.) Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• diffhist m Feminism 05:00 −3 Niasoh talk contribs (Cleaned up using AutoEd)

18 June 2025

• diffhist University of Sydney 23:36 +1 Jace Aotearoa AU talk contribs (Update ranking)
• diffhist The Beatles 20:40 −21 154allysimonig talk contribs Tag: Manual revert
• diffhist The Beatles 20:39 +21 154allysimonig talk contribs Tag: Reverted
• diffhist William Shakespeare 17:19 0 John talk contribs (no hyphen here)
• diffhist Benjamin Disraeli 15:09 −220 EEng talk contribs (→Popular culture: source for the significance of this, please) Tag: Manual revert