Talk:CMS Energy
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Source for $900 million pay increase?
[edit]I found nothing to back that up, including in the source posted. What am I missing?
"instead getting $29 million in tax rebates, despite making a profit of $415 million, and increasing executive pay by 79% to $900.4 million in 2010 for its top 5 executives."
Here is some info indicating total exec pay in the tens of millions range.
https://energyandpolicy.org/utilities-executive-compensation-analysis-cms-energy/ Fieldlab (talk) 22:07, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Unknown-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Stub-Class energy articles
- Low-importance energy articles
- Stub-Class Michigan articles
- Low-importance Michigan articles
- WikiProject Michigan articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors