Talk:Creek Fire

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wildfire Low‑importance

	Creek Fire is part of WikiProject Wildfire, which collaborates on wildfire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.WildfireWikipedia:WikiProject WildfireTemplate:WikiProject WildfireWildfire
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Weather: Droughts / Wildfires Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Droughts and wildfires task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions:

Not moved, 14 June 2021, to 2020 Creek Fire, see discussion.
Moved, 10 January 2025, from Creek Fire (2020) to Creek Fire, see discussion.

Disambiguation

Starting to have a few "creek fire" articles here. I think the best option is for this article to be titled Creek Fire (2020) and for the Creek Fire title to redirect to the existing disambiguation page at Creek Fire (disambiguation). Any objections? — Satori Son 13:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. — Satori Son 20:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Camp Fire (2018) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 08:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 10 January 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Frost 05:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Creek Fire (2020) → Creek Fire – In my opinion, the 2020 Creek Fire is the PRIMARYTOPIC, as it burned much larger/burned much more structures than the 2017 Creek Fire. Page views seems to confirm this, with the 2020 fire having anywhere between 2 to 5x the page views on average(before Jan '25 fires hit). Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 18:21, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support This one is the clear primary topic. It was considerably more destructive than 2017, while 2006 and 2025 don't even have articles. QuicoleJR (talk) 18:25, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The two major aspects of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC are whether people are looking for that one topic in particular and whether that topic will be more significant long-term. People are looking for the 2020 fire: the 2020 fire received 6.5 times more pageviews in 2024. The 2020 fire has more long-term significance: the number of acres burned by the 2020 fire is greater than the 2017 fire by an order of magnitude. PrinceTortoise (he/him • poke • inspect) 20:19, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support given that it is the clear primary topic.

Penitentes (talk) 20:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.