Talk:Document Content Architecture
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of Revisable-Form Text was merged into Document Content Architecture on 7 September 2020. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Merge proposal
[edit]2019 proposal to merge the long-standing stub Revisable-Form Text to here seems very reasonable, given that it covers a subtopic. Klbrain (talk) 10:59, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Agree Since DCA and RFT are related to each other, just as PDF and .docx or .odt are similarly related, I support this Merge. Jimj wpg (talk) 01:29, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Missing feature
[edit]The article probably should mention that DCA-RFT was kind of notorious in the late 1980's for not supporting footnotes (see my previous comment at Talk:Revisable-Form Text). Also, I'm not sure what no implementations means -- there were certainly import and export filters... AnonMoos AnonMoos (talk) 16:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
History section
[edit]The entire history section appears to be User:Jaydubyah43's personal reminiscences. While it is certainly interesting information, I don't think it is appropriate content for a Wikipedia article. Wikipedia articles need to be based on verifiable published sources not personal reminiscences. I am wondering if there is anything salvageable in the addition or if we should just remove the whole section? SJK (talk) 09:05, 13 October 2020 (UTC)