Jump to content

Talk:Eye color

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why is editing blocked on an article with such poor sourcing?

[edit]

"DNA studies on ancient human remains confirm that light skin, hair and eyes were present at least tens of thousands of years ago on Neanderthals, who lived in Eurasia for 500,000 years.[51][52][53][54][55]"

No, those sources don't say that -- especially the bit about "500,000 years," but more important (given the subject of the article) nothing "confirms" "light eyes" in Neanderthals, only light skin and red hair. Genes expressing blue eyes in modern homo sapiens were present but less dominant in a couple DNA samples mentioned in one of the articles, but that's it, and the article warns that the study is not widely accepted and that we ahve no way of knowing what the actual effect of thse genes would have been.

Yet there it is: DNA studies on ancient human remains confirm that light skin, hair and eyes were present at least tens of thousands of years ago on Neanderthals, who lived in Eurasia for 500,000 years.[51][52][53][54][55]

Who besides me will actually READ all five of those sources? It's not unlikely that the original editor who contributed the sentences had racist motives. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:cda0:9220:c1ea:12f4:f079:be78 (talkcontribs)


I'm not sure what the argument is about, but the genetics people are stating that Neanderthals gave the homo sapiens light skin and light eyes over a period of time.ie blue and green eyes. Not sure why that would upset anyone or be a controversial idea. https://www.eupedia.com/europe/neanderthal_facts_and_myths.shtml

[edit]

This image should never be re-added to the article again. As was shown at the original deletion case on June 18, it is a copywritten work belonging to Beals and Hoijer (1965). Frost used this with limited permission in his blog post, but we do not have permission from Beals and Hoijer to use it. Regrettably, this image was recently re-uploaded under a false license using a circular reference, and has now been nominated for deletion again. Please don't add this image to the article as it is a violation of international copyright law. - A Rainbow Footing It (talk) 02:57, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for brining attention to this. This map should not be added to this page as it does appear to violate copyright law without permission from Beals and Hoijer. I am in full agreement with you. Upon the rein of a wimpling wing (talk) 16:01, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

[edit]

Predictably, the individual who uploaded this image and posted it here, Runjeetgupta008, has been confirmed as a sockpuppet of Tommygunn7886. Also confirmed as a sock was Ari Feldstein, who also edits with the same POV as Tommygunn7886. A Rainbow Footing It (talk) 19:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blue eyes

[edit]

Are not of European descent False misinformation They only appeared the last 6000 years 148.252.133.137 (talk) 08:46, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Black people

[edit]

you didn't show any pictures of black people is eyes. 197.239.13.113 (talk) 13:29, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 May 2025

[edit]
2403:5809:F231:0:440A:99CC:C11B:A105 (talk) 10:57, 25 May 2025 (UTC) I want to write also known as eye colour[reply]