Jump to content

Talk:Liquid Glass

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Does this need a page?

[edit]

I feel like this would do better in a page about like the style of apple or something instead of its own page. It just doesn't seem notable enough. 2A00:23C8:9C7F:B801:901C:1751:5B2:4396 (talk) 23:58, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aqua, Material Design, Aero, Metro, Fluent, and Adwaita all have dedicated pages. This being Apple's next big design language, all tech blogs will probably cover Liquid Glass in enough detail over the next few weeks and months to establish notability. Blubits (talk) 06:07, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is a "Reception" section necessary?

[edit]

The responses to the design change don't seem very strong. Any controversy will probably be gone by the time it actually releases. It feels like recency bias to include it in the article. Pxldnky77 (talk) 00:28, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We can change it accordingly as the reception evolves. Sohom (talk) 04:08, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]

  • ... that Liquid Glass was criticised for being too transparent ?
Created by Sohom Datta (talk), TempoaryAcc (talk), Limmidy (talk), and Blubits (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 13 past nominations.

Sohom (talk) 04:06, 12 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Article Name

[edit]

I think it would be more suitable for this article to have a name like “Liquid Glass (user interface)” or “Liquid Glass (design language)” because on its own the term “Liquid Glass” isn’t indicative of the fact that it’s a design language. The name isn’t something like “Apple Liquid Glass” and I don’t think the name of Apple’s new design language will be particularly well known outside of people interested in user interfaces, design, etc. This would also match the article for Apple’s Aqua Tellurium6 (talk) 05:09, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:D2D, this should only be done if there is another subject described on Wikipedia with precisely the name "Liquid Glass". jlwoodwa (talk) 05:18, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neither Material Design nor Fluent Design System have anything in their names to indicate that they're design languages (other than perhaps "Design System" for the latter) or to indicate that they're from Google and Microsoft, respectively. Metro (design language) and Adwaita (design language) have "(design language)" in the page titles, but, as per jlwoodwa, that's because Metro is a disambiguation page that links to a lot of different "Metro"-related pages and Adwaita refers to a tortoise. Guy Harris (talk)