Talk:Loo

Toilet

This edit removed Toilet on the grounds that "[Loo is] not mentioned in the linked article; disambiguation pages are not guides to slang". I make no comment about whether the page should be "a guide to slang", but the Toilet article does have a Loo section. Should we consider restoring the link to Toilet? Mitch Ames (talk) 12:19, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah thanks for pointing that out. I've no objection to including the link to Toilet then. older ≠ wiser 12:23, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That meaning needs links to both the object and room that contains it, since they can be used interchangeably. The derivation can be best dealt with there. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 16:57, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A disambiguation page should not contain content that is not supported by the linked articles. older ≠ wiser 18:14, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]