Talk:OpenDor Media

Parts of this page are related to a topic subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)

Administrators may disregard the above message.
You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If administrator}}. You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning { display: none; }

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a contentious topic.

The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:

All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours (except in limited circumstances)
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)

Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment.If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Filmmaking

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Unpacked article

Why do you keep undoing these valid revisions? The article was clearly biased. 2607:F470:6:3001:B1F9:50E0:3EA5:C168 (talk) 14:04, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accusations not supported by sources

@AscendedGoblin Please explain how your accusations are supported by your source. They are unfounded, and this is defamatory. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 00:56, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is not 'my accusation.' The very first sentence of the source defines Nakba denial as "denying Zionist culpability for the mass expulsions of Palestinian Arabs from their homeland in 1948." Noam Weissman does exactly that, and so the narrative he pushes would be characterized by some as Nakba denial.

I will update that sentence to "This view is criticized by some as a form of Nakba denial" so it reads more neutral. In the future please discuss your disagreements on the talk page here. AscendedGoblin (talk) 01:57, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is WP:SYNTH. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:59, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, several topic-banned editors built up this article, which has serious NPOV violations.Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nakba denial Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 02:05, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It appears the article you're referring to was kept and I can't seem to find who these "several topic-banned editors" are.

Aside from that, it is irrelevant because I provided another source AscendedGoblin (talk) 02:15, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Explain how AscendedGoblin (talk) 02:09, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's SYNTH because you don't have a reference linking the accused to the accusation. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 02:33, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your issue had to do with that one sentence about Nakba denial. You did not have justification to delete the entire section. AscendedGoblin (talk) 03:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@AscendedGoblin: you are discussing a contentious topic. Since you do not have 500 edits + 30 days experience, as noted in the notice at the top of this page and the notice on your talk page, you cannot discuss this topic. It is reserved for more experienced editors as there has been much disruption in the past. If you continue to violate contentious topics restrictions, you may have your editing privileges curtailed. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:28, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note to others reading this thread. The contentious topics notice was only placed here at 25 Apr 2025 about 0245 UTC, so only @AscendedGoblin's last comment is after the notice appeared. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:04, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]